SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Gastrointestinal Complications Of Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery In View Of The Current Literature

Laparoskopik Ürolojik Cerrahinin Güncel Literatür Eşliğinde Gastrointestinal Komplikasyonları

Yiğit AKIN
İşıl Başara AKIN
Mehmet GÜLÜM
Mehmet DEMİR
Halil ÇİFTÇİ
Harun AYDOĞAN
Ercan YENİ
Pages
311–323
Publication Date
2015-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we evaluated gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic urologic surgery and its diagnosis methods in view of current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, laparoscopic urologic surgical procedures have been preferred for most of the major urologic surgical procedures in advanced surgical centers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Upto now, benefits of laparoscopic urologic surgeries have been presented in numerous studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we evaluated gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic urologic surgery and its diagnosis methods in view of current literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cerrahi · Komplikasyon · Laparoskopi

Abstract

Recently, laparoscopic urologic surgical procedures have been preferred for most of the major urologic surgical procedures in advanced surgical centers. Upto now, benefits of laparoscopic urologic surgeries have been presented in numerous studies. The consciousness has been appeared in patients parallel to clinicians prefered these surgical options. Although there are some benefits, there are complications in laparoscopic urologic surgery, notably gastrointestinal complications can annoy. In this review, we evaluated gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic urologic surgery and its diagnosis methods in view of current literature.

Özet

Günümüzde gelişmiş cerrahi merkezlerde, ürolojik majör cerrahi işlemlerin çoğunda laparoskopi uygulamaları tercih edilmektedir. Şimdiye kadar yapılmış birçok çalışmada laparoskopik ürolojik cerrahinin çeşitli faydaları tarif edilmiştir. Klinisyenlerin bu cerrahi seçeneği daha çok tercih etmesine paralel olarak, hastalarda da bu cerrahi seçenek için bilinç oluşmaya başlamıştır. Birçok faydası olsa da laparoskopik ürolojik cerrahinin komplikasyonları mevcuttur ve özellikle de gastrointestinal komplikasyonları can sıkıcı olabilmektedir. Bu derlemede güncel literatür eşliğinde laparoskopik ürolojik cerrahinin gastrointestinal komplikasyonları ve tanı yöntemleri gözden geçirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, Y., AKIN, İ. B., GÜLÜM, M., DEMİR, M., ÇİFTÇİ, H., AYDOĞAN, H., YENİ, E. (2015). Gastrointestinal Complications Of Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery In View Of The Current Literature. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 311–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/106890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Figenshau RS, Chandhoke PS, Albala DM. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: initial clinical case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1(6): 343-9
  2. Janetschek G, Hobisch A, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology. 2000;55(1):136-40
  3. Guillonneau B, Vallencien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000;163(6):1643–9
  4. Gozen AS, Akin Y. Are structured curriculums for laparoscopic training useful? A review of current literature. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(2):163-7
  5. Akin Y, Ates M, Celik O, Ucar M, Yucel S, Erdogru T. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a center surgeon's experience involving 601 procedures including the learning curve. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2013;29(5):275-9
  6. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Marberger M Benefits of laparoscopic renal surgery are more pronounced in patients with a high body mass index. Eur Urol 2003;43(5):522-7
  7. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003;169(5): 1689-93 8- Arslan M, Akin Y, Ates M, Gözen AS, Tunç L, Güven S.Comparison of Laparoscopic Vessel Sealing Devices in a Porcine Model;Turkurolap Group Study. Kuwait Medical Journal 2013;16(3):389-91
  8. Akin Y, Avci E, Gulmez H, Akand M, Akif Ciftcioglu M, Bassorgun I, Erdogru T. Indications for intraoperative frozen section in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17(18):2523-9
  9. Tunc L, Gumustas H, Akin Y, Atkin S, Peker T, Erdem O, Bozkirli I. A novel surgical technique for preserving the bladder neck during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. J Endourol 2015;29(2):186-91
  10. Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Dig Surg 2001;18(4):260–73
  11. Parsons JK, Jarrett TJ, Chow GK, Kavoussi LR. The effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopy. J Urol 2002; 168(6):2387-90
  12. Nazemi T, Galich A, Sterrett S, Klingler D, Smith L, Balaji KC. Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Int Braz J Urol 2006; 32(1):15-22. 14- de Menezes Ettinger JE, Santos-Filho PV, Oliveira