SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Bilimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Impacts of Integrated Marketing Communication Strategies Applied for Geographical Indications on Purchasing Behavior

Ayça Kırgız
Pages
87–100
Publication Date
2017-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This has revealed the existence of other fundamental problems which are discussed in part of conclusion and recommendation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to raise the awareness for products with geographical indication (GI) which directly influence the development of local and nation-wide economies, marketing of tourism activities and branding of destination and to investigate the integrated marketing communication (IMC) tools applied for realization of selling and the impact of such tools on shopping behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But there are only 200 products in Turkey with GI registration despite the high GI potential thereof.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This has revealed the existence of other fundamental problems which are discussed in part of conclusion and recommendation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geographical indication · integrated marketing communication · local products

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to raise the awareness for products with geographical indication (GI) which directly influence the development of local and nation-wide economies, marketing of tourism activities and branding of destination and to investigate the integrated marketing communication (IMC) tools applied for realization of selling and the impact of such tools on shopping behavior. In this study, simple linear regression analysis have been used. The data analysis showed that the perceived quality of food products and IMC tools appear to affect purchase behavior in a positive way. But there are only 200 products in Turkey with GI registration despite the high GI potential thereof. This result reveals the fact that despite the rapidly increasing state incentive the GI concept of Turkey is not yet understood fully and its significance is not understood sufficiently. This has revealed the existence of other fundamental problems which are discussed in part of conclusion and recommendation.

Özet

The purpose of this study is to raise the awareness for products with geographical indication (GI) which directly influence the development of local and nation-wide economies, marketing of tourism activities and branding of destination and to investigate the integrated marketing communication (IMC) tools applied for realization of selling and the impact of such tools on shopping behavior. In this study, simple linear regression analysis have been used. The data analysis showed that the perceived quality of food products and IMC tools appear to affect purchase behavior in a positive way. But there are only 200 products in Turkey with GI registration despite the high GI potential thereof. This result reveals the fact that despite the rapidly increasing state incentive the GI concept of Turkey is not yet understood fully and its significance is not understood sufficiently. This has revealed the existence of other fundamental problems which are discussed in part of conclusion and recommendation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kırgız, A. (2017). Impacts of Integrated Marketing Communication Strategies Applied for Geographical Indications on Purchasing Behavior. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.303277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Addor, F., and A. Grazioli (2002) Geographical Indications beyond Wines and Spirits: A Roadmap for a Better Protection for Geographical Indications in the WTO Trips Agreement. Journal of World Intellectual Property 5(6): 865-97.
  2. Akin, E. B., (2006) Coğrafi İşaret Olarak Tescil Edilmiş Malatya Kayısısının Teknolojik Özelliklerinin Saptanması ve Gıda Güvenliği Açısından Araştırılması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bil. Ens. Gıda Mühendisliği ABD, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
  3. Albayram Z., Mattas K., Tsakiridou E. (2014) Purchasing Local and Non-local Products Labeled with Geographical Indications (GIs), Operational Research (14).
  4. Arzenton V., Neresini F., Ravarotto L. (2005), A Tavola con Sicurezza. La Percezione del Rischio Alimentare in Veneto, Vicenza: Ergon.
  5. Babcock B. A., Clemens R. (2004) Geographical Indications and Property Rights: Protecting Value-Added Agricultural Products, MATRIC Briefing Paper.
  6. Barjolle D., Paus M. & Perret A. (2009) Impacts of Geographical Indications – Review of methods and empirical evidences, Contributed paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 16-22, 2009, in Beijing, China, 14 p. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/51737/2/PaperIAAE2009_85.pdf
  7. Battaglini C. et al. (2007) The effects of an individualized exercise intervention on body composition in breast cancer patients undergoing treatment. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, São Paulo, v.125, no.1.
  8. Blakeney M. (2001) Proposals for the International Regulation of Geographical Indications, September, The Journal of World Intellectual Property.
  9. Bilkey W. J., Nes E. (1982) Country of Origin Effects on Product Evaluations, Journal of Internationa Business Studies, Vol.13.
  10. Cerdan C., Vitrolles D., Delfosse C., Velloso C. Q., Nabinger C. & Silva A.L. (2009), Penser la conservation des ressources bioculturelles sous l’angle de la valorisation de l’origine: la mise en place d’indications géographiques dans le Sud Brésil, Autrepart, 50.
  11. Çalişkan V., Koç H. (2012), Evaluation of Distributional Characteristics of Geographical Indications and the Potential for Geographical Indications in Turkey, Eastern Geographical Review – 28.
  12. Delphine Marie V. (2008) From Plant Variety Definition to Geographical Indication Protection: A Search for the Link Between Basmati Rice and India/Pakistan, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, no. 4.
  13. Kotler P. and Armstrong G. (2016) Principles of Marketing, England, Pearson Education Limited.
  14. Mascarello G., Pinto A., Parise N., Crovato S. & Ravarotto L. (2015) The Perception of Food Quality. Profiling Italian Consumers, Appetite (89): 175-182.
  15. Oraman Yasemin (2015) Türkiye’de Coğrafi İşaretli Ürünler, Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 01 (01).
  16. Şentürk B. (2011) Coğrafi İşaretlerin Ekonomik Etkileri: Mikro ve Makro Açıdan Bir Değerlendirme, Muğla Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  17. Vitrolles Delphine (2011) When Geographical Indication Conflicts with Food Heritage Protection, Anthropology of Food, Vol.8, https://aof.revues.org/6809.
  18. “Coğrafi İşaretler”, http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr
  19. Cerdan C., Vitrolles D., Delfosse C., Velloso C. Q., Nabinger C. & Silva A.L. (2009), Penser la conservation des ressources bioculturelles sous l’angle de la valorisation de l’origine: la mise en place d’indications géographiques dans le Sud Brésil, Autrepart, 50.