SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Bilimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Strategic Partnerships in Social Marketing: A Qualitative Study of NGOs-Company Collaborations in Practices for Child Welfare in Türkiye

Melda Aslan(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2591-8638
Pages
508–525
Publication Date
2026-06-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that company-NGO collaborations provide operational convenience, financial resources, and visibility to NGOs, while supporting corporate reputation and conferring social legitimacy to companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines social marketing practices conducted in the field of child welfare and aims to understand the factors influencing the participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in these practices and the associated benefits and challenges within the Turkish context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Social marketing practices in Türkiye are often carried out in areas that intersect with corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, particularly in the context of cooperation between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and companies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that company-NGO collaborations provide operational convenience, financial resources, and visibility to NGOs, while supporting corporate reputation and conferring social legitimacy to companies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Marketing · Non-Governmental Organizations · Companies

Abstract

This study examines social marketing practices conducted in the field of child welfare and aims to understand the factors influencing the participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in these practices and the associated benefits and challenges within the Turkish context. Social marketing practices in Türkiye are often carried out in areas that intersect with corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, particularly in the context of cooperation between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and companies. In this sense, the study evaluates social marketing strategies and practices that aim to produce social benefits through voluntary behavior change, rather than simply creating visibility for a social problem or enhancing the corporate image. Using a qualitative descriptive design method, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 NGO managers who had participated in social marketing practices focused on child welfare. The findings reveal that company-NGO collaborations provide operational convenience, financial resources, and visibility to NGOs, while supporting corporate reputation and conferring social legitimacy to companies. However, in addition to mutual benefits, these collaborations sometimes create power asymmetries and lead to ethical and structural problems such as the instrumentalization of children and mission drift. The study argues that social marketing practices should be designed in line with ethical principles and shared goals in order to be sustainable and have a social impact.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aslan, M. (2026). Strategic Partnerships in Social Marketing: A Qualitative Study of NGOs-Company Collaborations in Practices for Child Welfare in Türkiye. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 508–525. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1757219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Aboramadan, M. (2018). NGOs management: A roadmap to effective practices. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(4), 372-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2018-0033
  2. Akboğa, S. (2017). The current state of volunteering in Turkey. In J. Butcher & C. J. Einolf (Eds.), Perspectives on volunteering: Voices from the South (pp. 245–261). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39899-0_13
  3. Albu, O. B. (2023). Managing visibilities: The shades and shadows of NGO work in repressive contexts. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(3), 659-685. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221144991
  4. Allen, K. (2003). The social case for corporate volunteering. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 8(1), 57-62.
  5. Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.3.17602
  6. Andreasen, A. R. (2006). Social marketing in the 21st century. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329192
  7. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Suppl 1), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0
  8. Aslan, H., & Tuncay, T. (2023a). Advancing and sustaining volunteerism: Investigating the multifaceted challenges and obstacles to volunteer engagement. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 23(3), 724-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12369
  9. Aslan, H., & Tuncay, T. (2023b). Examining the factors affecting the voluntary participation and effects of volunteering in the child welfare in Türkiye. Journal of Social Service Research, 49(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2022.2156970
  10. Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2012). The role of NGOs and civil society in development and poverty reduction. (BWPI Working Paper No. 171). Brooks World Poverty Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2072157
  11. Başar, M. (2023). Türkiye’de çocuk koruma alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [An examination of graduate theses in the field of child protection in Turkey]. Disiplinlerarası Çocuk Hakları Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(5), 31–49. https://izlik.org/JA77TB77KK
  12. Bianchi, E. C., Daponte, G. G., & Pirard, L. (2021). The impact of cause-related marketing practices on the reputation of corporations and NGOs. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 18(2), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00268-x
  13. Blum, I., & Uldam, J. (2025). Faking, optimising and conceding to power: Social movement understandings of social media power. New Media & Society, 27(11), 6233-6251. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241266769
  14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  15. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2004). Partnerships between international donors and nongovernmental development organizations: Opportunities and constraints. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044254
  16. Capece, G., & Costa, R. (2013). The new neighbourhood in the internet era: Network communities serving local communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(5), 438-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.610825
  17. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  18. Cordery, C., Belal, A. R., & Thomson, I. (2019). NGO accounting and accountability: Past, present and future. Accounting Forum, 43(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2019.1593577
  19. Corporate Tax Law. (2006). Law No. 5520. Official Gazette (No. 26205).
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  21. De la Cuesta, M., & Valor, C. (2003). Responsabilidad social de la empresa: Concepto, medición y desarrollo en españa. Boletín Económico del ICE, 2755, 7–19.
  22. Donovan, R., & Henley, N. (2003). Social marketing: Principles and practice. IP Communications.
  23. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional‐stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x
  24. Durgeç, P. (2020). A research on children’s representations in the Turkish press in the context of ethical responsibility of the media. Uluslararası Medya ve İletişim Araştırmaları Hakemli Dergisi, 3(2), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.33464/mediaj.829045
  25. Eagle, L. (2008). Social marketing ethics. National Social Marketing Centre.
  26. Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). Defining the third sector in Europe. In A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.), The third sector in Europe (pp. 11-44). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843769774
  27. Florence, E. S., Fleischman, D., Mulcahy, R., & Wynder, M. (2022). Message framing effects on sustainable consumer behaviour: A systematic review and future research directions for social marketing. Journal of Social Marketing, 12(4), 623-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-09-2021-0221
  28. Galiano-Coronil, A., Alcedo-Velázquez, M. Y., Blanco-Moreno, S., & Tobar Pesántez, L. B. (2024). Comparison and positioning of NGOs aimed at children from the perspective of social marketing on Twitter. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02611-7
  29. Gevorgyan, G., & Manucharova, N. (2012). Children and persuasive advertising: Drawing the line between peripheral and informative TV commercials. Journal of Politics and Law, 5(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v5n3p15
  30. Goddard, C., & Saunders, B. J. (2000). The gender neglect and textual abuse of children in the print media. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 9(1), 37-48.
  31. Grier, S., & Bryant, C. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610
  32. Grigoryan, N. (2019). Ethics of a social marketing practice: An integrative assessment model. Journal of Media Ethics, 34(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2019.1600406
  33. Hafsi, T., & Thomas, H. (2005). Strategic management and change in high dependency environments: The case of a philanthropic organization. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-005-9146-y
  34. Hayden, D., & Deng, F. (2013). The science of goal setting: A practitioner’s guide to goal setting in the social marketing of conservation. Social Marketing Quarterly, 19(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500412472496
  35. Haski-Leventhal, D., Meijs, L. C., & Hustinx, L. (2010). The third-party model: Enhancing volunteering through governments, corporations and educational institutes. Journal of Social Policy, 39(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990377
  36. Haski-Leventhal, D. (2018). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Tools and theories for responsible management. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036231934
  37. Hastings, G., & Angus, K. (2011). When is social marketing not social marketing? Journal of Social Marketing, 1(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111104428
  38. Hulme, D. (2013). Making a difference: NGO’s and development in a changing world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070308
  39. Income Tax Law. (1960). Law No. 193. Official Gazette (No. 10695).
  40. Jensen, P. R., & Meisenbach, R. J. (2015). Alternative organizing and (in) visibility: Managing tensions of transparency and autonomy in a nonprofit organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 564-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915600577
  41. Jackson, M. (2020). Ethical challenges associated with social marketing communication. In L. Parker & L. Brennan (Eds.), Social marketing and advertising in the age of social media (pp. 137-156). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434678.00016
  42. Johnson, S. L., Bellows, L., Beckstrom, L., & Anderson, J. (2007). Evaluation of a social marketing practice targeting preschool children. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.31.1.5
  43. Kamerman, S. B., Phipps, S., & Ben-Arieh, A. (Eds.). (2009). From child welfare to child well-being: An international perspective on knowledge in the service of policy making. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2
  44. Kim, E., Xie, Q., Hong, J. W., & Kim, H. M. (2025). Prosocial campaigns with virtual influencers: Stories, messages, and beyond. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6956-6967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2387399
  45. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3-12.
  46. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2008). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Sage.
  47. Law on Associations (2004). Law No. 5253. Official Gazette (No. 25654).
  48. Law on Foundations (2008). Law No. 5737. Official Gazette (No. 26800).
  49. Lee, N. R., & Kotler, P. (2011). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Sage.
  50. Lefebvre, R. C. (2013). Social marketing and social change: Strategies and tools for improving health, well-being, and the environment. John Wiley & Sons.
  51. Mayer, C. (2021). The future of the corporation and the economics of purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660
  52. Mitchell, G. E. (2014). Strategic responses to resource dependence among transnational NGOs registered in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9329-2
  53. Okcebe, M. (2023). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının profesyonelleşmesi: Sivil toplumun dönüşümü [Professionalization of non-governmental organizations: Transformation of civil society] [Unpublished master’s thesis, Istanbul Bilgi University].
  54. Özdemir, B. P. (2012). Social Media as a tool for online advocacy practices: Greenpeace Mediterranean’s anti genetically engineered food practice in Turkey. Global Media Journal, 5(2), 23-39.
  55. Par, A., & Polat, O. (2024). NGO management and brand strength with social marketing context: The Cide LAG. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(4), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.23762/fso_vol12_no4_7
  56. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
  57. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
  58. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University.
  59. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 1-17.
  60. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1996). The emerging nonprofit sector: An Overview. Manchester University.
  61. Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., & Malesios, C. (2015). Priorities and perceptions for corporate social responsibility: An NGO perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1332
  62. Uldam, J. (2018). Social media visibility: Challenges to activism. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717704997
  63. Verissimo, D., Bianchessi, A., Arrivillaga, A., Cadiz, F. C., Mancao, R., & Green, K. (2018). Does it work for biodiversity? Experiences and challenges in the evaluation of social marketing practices. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500417734806
  64. Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, L. C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436
  65. Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 110-115.
  66. Young, J., Rout, J., Hall, S., & Stannard, S. (1999). Social marketing as a tool to stop child abuse and neglect (CB White Paper No. 101). CB.
  67. Zihnioğlu, Ö. (2013). European Union civil society policy and Turkey: A bridge too far? Springer.