Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THE EU AND TURKEY

Girişimcilikte Cinsiyet Farklılıkları: AB ve Türkiye

Pages
317–349
Publication Date
2023-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It begins with analysis of a range of specific challenges and obstacles faced by innovative women in setting up, running and expanding their businesses, discusses the individual resources of education and skills in terms of women’s entry in entrepreneurship and success, proceeds to analysis of entrepreneurship tools to the extent of which how such resources are related to the nature and volume of women’s entrepreneurship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim is to explore the challenges for women’s self-employment preferences in Turkey in terms of the human resources strategies, influence and importance of the EU policies affecting their entrepreneurial activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It focuses on the questions of how and why women’s entrepreneurship in Turkey is a distinct feature of the EU entrepreneurship, which may have a different impact on competitiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It begins with analysis of a range of specific challenges and obstacles faced by innovative women in setting up, running and expanding their businesses, discusses the individual resources of education and skills in terms of women’s entry in entrepreneurship and success, proceeds to analysis of entrepreneurship tools to the extent of which how such resources are related to the nature and volume of women’s entrepreneurship.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim is to explore the challenges for women’s self-employment preferences in Turkey in terms of the human resources strategies, influence and importance of the EU policies affecting their entrepreneurial activities. It focuses on the questions of how and why women’s entrepreneurship in Turkey is a distinct feature of the EU entrepreneurship, which may have a different impact on competitiveness. It begins with analysis of a range of specific challenges and obstacles faced by innovative women in setting up, running and expanding their businesses, discusses the individual resources of education and skills in terms of women’s entry in entrepreneurship and success, proceeds to analysis of entrepreneurship tools to the extent of which how such resources are related to the nature and volume of women’s entrepreneurship.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı insan kaynakları stratejileri ve kadın girişimcilik faaliyetlerini etkileyen Avrupa Birliği (AB) politikalarının etkisi ve önemi açısından Türkiye'de kadın serbest meslek tercihleri için zorlukları ele almaktır. Türkiye'de nasıl ve neden kadın girişimciliğinin rekabet üzerinde farklı bir etkiye sahip AB girişimciliğinin ayrı bir özelliğe sahip olup olmadığı sorularına odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma iş kuran, işleten ve işlerini büyüten yenilikçi kadınların karşılaştığı bir dizi özel zorluklar ve engellerin analizi ile başlayıp, kadınların girişimciliğe başlayışı ve başarısı açısından bireysel eğitim kaynaklarını ve becerilerini anlatmakta ve söz onusu kaynakların kadın girişimciliği doğası ve oranı ile nasıl ilgili olduğu yönünde girişimcilik mekanizmalarının analizi ile devam etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, G. (2023). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THE EU AND TURKEY. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 317–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/1023060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaltio, I. Introduction: Women Entrepreneurs – Creators and Creationsof Social Capital, in Women, Entrepreneurship and Social Capital: A Dialogue and Construction (2008).
  2. Acikgoz, E. Daily News, Turkey’s Unemployed University Graduates Take Unskilled Jobs (2018), Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-unemployed-university-graduates-take-unskilled-jobs-127127
  3. Arrhenius, P. and Kovalainen, A. Similarities and Differences Across the Factors Associated with Women’s Self-employment Preference in the Nordic Countries, International Small Business Journal, (2006): pp. 24-3.
  4. Buttner, E. Holly and Moore, D. Perrin. Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling (2007).
  5. Chand, A. Human Resource Strategies in Small States: the Case of Garment Factories in the FijiIslands, InternationalJournal of Educational Development 21, Elseview, (2001): pp. 273–284.
  6. Chant, S. and Pedwell, C. Women, Gender and the Informal Economy: An Assessment of ILO Research and Suggested Ways Forward, London School of Economics International Labour Organization (2008).
  7. Cotter, D., DeFiore, J., Hermsen, J. M., and Marsteller Kowalewski, B., All Women Benefits: The Macro-level Effort of Occupational Integration on Gender Earnings Equality, American Sociological Review, 62(5), (1997): 714-734.
  8. Curran, J. and Blackburn, R. Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage (2000). Daily News. Number of Employed Women Falls 40,000 in Turkey, 27 March 2017, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/number-of-employed-women-falls-40000-in-turkey-111288
  9. Dejardin, Amelita K., Gender Equality, Globalization and Governance, Working Paper No. 92, Policy Integration and Statistics Department International Labour Office Geneva, Working papers, International Labour Organization, March (2009).
  10. Dutz, Mark A., Ordover, Janusz A. and Willig, Robert D. Competition Policy and Development Entrepreneurship, Access Policy and Economic Development: Lessons from Industrial Organization, European Economic Review 44, Elsevier, (2000): 739-747.
  11. Ecevit, Y. Critical Approach to Women’s Entrepreneurship in Turkey, International Labour Office – Ankara,
  12. International Labour Organization (2007).
  13. Elia, G., Women’s Self-employment and Entrepreneurship in the Region of the Economic Commission for Europe (eds), Gender Gaps and Economic Policy, Trends and Good Practices from the ECE Region, United Nations, Genevo, (2009) pp.43-58.
  14. Ercan, H. Occupational Outlook Turkey, International Labour Organisation, Turkey (2011). Eurost