Journals / Language Teaching and Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Determining the Strategies Used by Teachers Working with Students with Intellectual Disabilities in Teaching Reading Comprehension

Pages
143–159
Publication Date
2023-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained as a result of this analysis showed that special education teachers used a limited number of strategies in teaching reading comprehension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The general purpose of this study was to define the strategies used by teachers working with students with intellectual disabilities in teaching them reading comprehension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with this general purpose, the study sought to find out which cognitive and metacognitive strategies these teachers working used before, during and after reading in reading comprehension activities in the classroom.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained as a result of this analysis showed that special education teachers used a limited number of strategies in teaching reading comprehension.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:special education · İntellectual disability · reading comprehension

Abstract

The general purpose of this study was to define the strategies used by teachers working with students with intellectual disabilities in teaching them reading comprehension. In line with this general purpose, the study sought to find out which cognitive and metacognitive strategies these teachers working used before, during and after reading in reading comprehension activities in the classroom. The study used semi-structured interviews, one of the data collections techniques employed in qualitative studies. Interviews were conducted with 13 special education teachers working with students with mild intellectual disabilities. These students are educated at a special education and practice school high school. The data obtained from the teachers were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The findings obtained as a result of this analysis showed that special education teachers used a limited number of strategies in teaching reading comprehension.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNLÜ, Y., YILMAZ, Ç. Ö. (2023). Determining the Strategies Used by Teachers Working with Students with Intellectual Disabilities in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Language Teaching and Educational Research, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 143–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/1021995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aktaş, E., & Bayram, B. (2018). Türkçe öğretiminde okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinin kullanımı üzerine bir inceleme. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(3), 1401-1414. [An Analysis on the use of Reading Comprehension Strategies in Turkish Education] https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/553622
  2. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 285 – 310). Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum. Alyousef, H. S. (2005). Teaching reading comprehensıon to ESL/EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 5(2), 143-154. https://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/alyousef/article.pdf
  3. Anmarkrud, O., & Braten, I. (2012). Naturally-occurring comprehension strategies instruction in 9th-grade language arts classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(6), 591–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.621134 Baker. L., & Brown, A.L. (2002). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-395). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315200651
  4. Barron, E. R., Rupley, W. H., Paige, D., Nichols, W. D., Nichols, J., & Lumbreras, R. (2018). Middle school teachers’ knowledge and use of comprehension strategies in discipline instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(10), 1–17. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.17.10.1 Baydık, B. (2011). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma stratejilerini kullanımı ve öğretmenlerinin okuduğunu anlama öğretim uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 301-319. [Examining the Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Students with Reading Difficulties and their Teachers’ Reading Comprehension Instruction Practices] Berkeley, S., & Larsen, A. (2018). Fostering self‐regulation of students with learning disabilities: Insights from 30 years of reading comprehension intervention study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12165
  5. Bishop, P. A., Reyes, C., & Pflaum, S. W. (2006). Read smarter, not harder: Global reading comprehension strategies. The Reading Teacher, 60(1), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.1.7
  6. Doganay Bilgi, A., & Ozmen, E. R. (2014). The impact of modified multi-component cognitive strategy instruction in the acquisition of metacognitive strategy knowledge in the text comprehension pr