SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Horticultural Studies / 2023 / Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3

Nematode Diversity Associated with Grapevines in İzmir, Manisa, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, and Bilecik Provinces in Türkiye

Lerzan ÖZTÜRK
Pages
98–106
Publication Date
2023-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, Mesocriconema xenoplax, Longidorus elongatus, Xiphinema index, X. italiae, Praylenchus thornei, and P. neglectus identified constitute a severe threat to grape production by causing crop damage or transmitting virus diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study was conducted in İzmir, Manisa, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, and Bilecik provinces to determine nematode diversity and community structure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-six genera (İzmir 34 genera; Manisa 32 genera; Bilecik 21 genera; Çanakkale 28 genera) with different trophic groups were recorded: fungivores (3 genera; e.g., Aphelenchoides spp.), bacterivores (9 genera, e.g., Achromadora Cobb, 1913 and Plectus Bastian 1865 spp.), omnivore (4 genera; e.g., Aporcelaimus Thorne, 1936 and Dorylaimus Thorne & Swanger, 1936 and Eudorylaimus Andrassy, 1959 spp.), predators (3 genera; e.g., Clarkus spp.), herbivores (17 genera; e.g., Boleodorus tylactus Thorne, 1941).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, Mesocriconema xenoplax, Longidorus elongatus, Xiphinema index, X. italiae, Praylenchus thornei, and P. neglectus identified constitute a severe threat to grape production by causing crop damage or transmitting virus diseases.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Community structure · Nematode fauna · Predators

Abstract

The study was conducted in İzmir, Manisa, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, and Bilecik provinces to determine nematode diversity and community structure. Thirty-six genera (İzmir 34 genera; Manisa 32 genera; Bilecik 21 genera; Çanakkale 28 genera) with different trophic groups were recorded: fungivores (3 genera; e.g., Aphelenchoides spp.), bacterivores (9 genera, e.g., Achromadora Cobb, 1913 and Plectus Bastian 1865 spp.), omnivore (4 genera; e.g., Aporcelaimus Thorne, 1936 and Dorylaimus Thorne & Swanger, 1936 and Eudorylaimus Andrassy, 1959 spp.), predators (3 genera; e.g., Clarkus spp.), herbivores (17 genera; e.g., Boleodorus tylactus Thorne, 1941). Twenty-six species of herbivores were identified, and the most common species were from the genera Filenchus Andrassy, 1954, Geocenamus Thorne & Malek, 1968; Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1934, and Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. Dorylaimus Dujardin, 1845; Mesorhabditis Osche, 1952; Cephalobus Bastian, 1865; Acrobeloides Cobb, 1924; Mesodorylaimus Andreassy, 1959; Aphelenchus Bastian, 1865, and Ditylenchus Filipjev were other commonly found nematode genera. Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, Mesocriconema xenoplax, Longidorus elongatus, Xiphinema index, X. italiae, Praylenchus thornei, and P. neglectus identified constitute a severe threat to grape production by causing crop damage or transmitting virus diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, L. (2023). Nematode Diversity Associated with Grapevines in İzmir, Manisa, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, and Bilecik Provinces in Türkiye. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3, 98–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M., & Askary, T.H. (2015) Impact of phytonematodes on agriculture economy. In: Askary TH, Martinelli PRP (Ed.) Biocontrol agents of Phytonematodes. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 3-49.
  2. Agulheiro-Santos C.A., Laranjo, M., & Ricardo-Rodrigues, S. (2022). Table Grapes: There Is More to Vitiviniculture than Wine. Grapes and Wine. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.99986. Akyazı, F., Yildiz, S., & Dede, Ö. & Felek, A. (2012). Biodiversity of nematodes in potato growing areas of Ordu, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 11:2660-2664.
  3. Al-Banna, L., & Gardner, S.L. (1996). "Nematode Diversity of Native Species of Vitis in California". Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/65. Accessed date: 1 February, 2023.
  4. Arrold, N.P., Blake, C.D. (1966). Some effects of Ditylenchus myceliophagus and Aphelenchoides composticola on the growth on agar plates of the cultivated mushroom, Agaricus bisporus Nematologica, 12:501-510.
  5. Blanc, C., Sy, M., Djigal, D., Brauman, A., Normand, P., & Villenave, C. (2006). Nutrition on bacteria by bacterial-feeding nematodes and consequences on the structure of soil bacterial community. Eurepan Journal of Soil Biology, 42:S70–S78. Bongers, R. (1990). The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia, 83:14-19.
  6. Bongers, T., & Ferris, H. (1999). Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends Ecology and Evolation, 14(6):224-228.
  7. Bongers, T., & Bongers, M. (1998). Functional diversity of nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology, 10(3):239-251.
  8. Deimi, A.M., & Mitkowski, N. (2010). Nematodes associated with vineyards throughout Markazi Province (Arak), Iran. Australasian Plant Pathology, 39:571–577.
  9. Elekçioğlu D.H., Ohnesorge, B., Lung, G., & Uygun, N. (1994). Plant parasitic nematodes in the East Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Nematologia Mediterranea, 22:59-63.
  10. Forge, T., Smit, R., Neilsen, D., & Neilsen, G. (2020). Potential impacts of the ring nematode, Mesocriconema xenoplax, on grapevines in British Columbia: a microplot study. Journal of Nematology, 52:e2020-86. Hoschitz, M. (2004). Community and trophic structure of soil nematodes associated with Vitis spp. in Austria. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 141:97–107.
  11. Ingham, R.E., Trofymow, J.A., Ingham, E.R., & Coleman, D.C. (1985). Interactions of b