SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul / 2023 / Sayı: 73

A study on the deposit (within the meaning of Art. 177 of the COT), the actual forfeiture (art. 178 of the COT), and the resolutive penalty (the last paragraph of Art. 179 of the COT)

Efe Can YILDIRIR
Pages
207–237
Publication Date
2023-11-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, these sections will only analyze Swiss law regarding the examination of these concepts, given the exceptional nature of these provisions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acts that parties fulfill or undertake to fulfill in order to prove a contract concluded or to be rid of an undertaken commitment are frequently encountered in both daily and commercial life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to analyze each of these concepts separately in terms of theory and practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, these sections will only analyze Swiss law regarding the examination of these concepts, given the exceptional nature of these provisions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Earnest Money · Forfeit Money · Contractual Penalty

Abstract

Acts that parties fulfill or undertake to fulfill in order to prove a contract concluded or to be rid of an undertaken commitment are frequently encountered in both daily and commercial life. When taking this situation into consideration, legislators have considered the importance of these types of centuries-old habits by introducing regulations to the Turkish Code of Obligations (TCO) on earnest money, forfeit money, or withdrawal and termination by paying a penalty and attaching certain legal consequences. This study aims to analyze each of these concepts separately in terms of theory and practice. The first section will analyze earnest money from the point of view of its nature, function, and fate in the event of performance or non-performance of the main performance obligation, as well as the application or non-application of the last paragraph of Article 182 in the TCO concerning the reduction of the contractual penalty. In particular, the first section will discuss the provisions of the German Civil Code concerning deposits and their compatibility with Turkish law. The second and third chapters will examine the concepts and similar functions of forfeit money and withdrawal or termination by paying a penalty from the point of view of their nature, their functions, and their fate in the event of performance or non-performance of the main performance obligation, as well as the application or non-application of the last paragraph of Article 182 in the TCO concerning the reduction of the contractual penalty. In this context, these sections will only analyze Swiss law regarding the examination of these concepts, given the exceptional nature of these provisions.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIR, E. C. (2023). A study on the deposit (within the meaning of Art. 177 of the COT), the actual forfeiture (art. 178 of the COT), and the resolutive penalty (the last paragraph of Art. 179 of the COT). Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Sayı: 73, 207–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/1019934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Altop S, Roma Malvarlığı Hukukunda Pey Akçesi ‘‘Arra’’ (Istanbul 1994). google scholar Becker H, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Obligationenrecht, Allgemeinen Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183 OR (2eme edition, Stâmpfli Verlag AG 1945). google scholar Berger B, Allgemeines Schuldrecht (3e edition Stâmpfli Verlag 2018). google scholar Berki O F, ‘Pey Akçesi, Rücu Tazminatı ve Cezai Şart (Mukavele Cezası) Etrafında Tetkikler’ (1943) 17 (5) İBD 277, 303. google scholar Bucher E, Allgemeiner Teil des Obligationenrechts (2eme edition, Schultess 1988). google scholar Bucher E, Der Ausschluss dispositiven Gesetzesrechts durch vertragliche Absprachen-Bemerkungen zu den Erscheinungsformen dispositiver Rechtssâtze“, Festgabe für Henri Deschenaux zum 70. Geburstag (Freiburg /CH Universitâtsver 1977) 249-269. google scholar Couchepin G, La clause penale- Etude generale de l’institution et de quelques applications pratiques en droit de la construction (Schultess Juristische Medien 2008). google scholar Çetiner B et Furrer A et Müller-Chen, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (2e edition On İki Levha 2022). google scholar Düzceer R, ‘Pey Akçesi ve Zımanı Rücu’, (1956) 3 (3) Adalet Dergisi 342, 354. google scholar Engel P, Traite des obligations en droit suisse, Dispositions generales du CO (2e edition Stâmpfli 1997). google scholar Erdem M ‘Pey Akçesi-Pişmanlık Akçesi-Dönme Tazminatı’, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Hatemi’ye Armağan, Cilt: I, Editeurs: Hasan Erman, Saibe Oktay Özdemir, Mustafa Aksu, Burcu Kalkan Oğuztürk, Harun Demirbaş (Vedat Kitapçılık 2009) 663, 684. google scholar Erdem M, La clause penale, Etude comparative de droit suisse et de droit turc (Ankara 2006). google scholar Eren F et Dönmez Ü, Eren Borçlar Hukuku Şerhi, Cilt: III (m. 83-206) (Yetkin 2022). google scholar Eren F, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (27e edition Yetkin 2022). google scholar Feyzioğlu F N, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Cilt II (2ime edition, Fakülteler Matbaası 1977). google scholar Franko N, ‘Pey Akçesinin Mahiyeti’, (1996) LV (1-2) İÜHFM 249, 262. google scholar Fries M et Schulze R, Nomos Kommentar, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Handkommentar (11e edition, Nomos 2022). google scholar Gauch P et Schluep W R et Emmenegger S, OR AT Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht Allgemeiner Teil Band II (11e edition, Schultess 2020). google scholar Gottwald P, Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 3, SchuldrechtAllgemeiner TeilII, Editeur: Wolfgang Krüger (8. Auflage, CH Beck 2019). google scholar Gümüş