SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul / 2023 / Sayı: 73

Green Is the New Black: The Rise of Green Marks and Possible Solutions to Greenwashing

Çiğdem Yatağan Özkan(TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, FACULTY OF LAW)0000-0002-1986-703X
Berrin Dinçer Özbey0009-0009-2334-5603
Pages
183–206
Publication Date
2023-11-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Upon this, the study then discusses the urgent need to regulate trademark law regarding green marks and makes proposals for legislation in line with recent EU regulation proposals regarding green claims.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:If a popularity contest were to occur among colors nowadays, green would be the winner by far.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to a significant percentage of consumers having changed their purchasing habits, companies are taunted with being green, and they have started greenwashing practices to take advantage of consumers’ new habits without changing their corporate policies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Upon this, the study then discusses the urgent need to regulate trademark law regarding green marks and makes proposals for legislation in line with recent EU regulation proposals regarding green claims.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Trademarks · Misleading Consumers · Green Marks

Abstract

If a popularity contest were to occur among colors nowadays, green would be the winner by far. Fast and alarming global warming has created huge and obligatory changes to consumer habits. This has put some big burdens on companies to massively change their production processes. Due to a significant percentage of consumers having changed their purchasing habits, companies are taunted with being green, and they have started greenwashing practices to take advantage of consumers’ new habits without changing their corporate policies. The rise of greenwashing has caused an urgent need to protect consumers and the market. Both Turkish and foreign governments regulate certain markets such as food and agriculture and also bring certain restrictions in terms of advertisement law to eliminate deceptive images from being created in consumers’ eyes. However, the gap in green marks shows the urgent need to amend the trademark law approach to protect consumers from greenwashing and to safeguard the proper functioning of the market. This work first examines the definition of green marks and ecolabels, as well as their confusing concepts, followed by present regulations regarding different legal areas. Upon this, the study then discusses the urgent need to regulate trademark law regarding green marks and makes proposals for legislation in line with recent EU regulation proposals regarding green claims.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, Ç. Y., Özbey, B. D. (2023). Green Is the New Black: The Rise of Green Marks and Possible Solutions to Greenwashing. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Sayı: 73, 183–206. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2023.73.0006

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Ahmed A. and Qureshi S., ‘Green Marketing: A Door To Sustainable Development’ (2019) 7(8) JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 1979 - 1987 google scholar
  2. Alnıaçık Ü., ‘Tüketicilerin Çevreye Duyarlılığı Ve Reklamlardaki Çevreci İddialar’ (2009) 18 google scholar
  3. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 48 - 79 google scholar
  4. Arkan S., Marka Hukuku I (BTHAE 1997) google scholar
  5. Arkan S., ‘Marka Tescil Başvurusunun Lisans Sözleşmesine Konu Olması-Bazı Sorunlar’ (2019) 35(3) Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 39 - 44 google scholar
  6. Aslan Y., Tüketici Hukuku Dersleri (Ekin 2021) google scholar
  7. Ayhan R. Çağlar H. Yıldız B. İmirlioğlu D., Sınai Mülkiyet Hukuku (Adalet 2021) google scholar
  8. Bainbridge D., Intellectual Property (9th edn Pearson 2012) google scholar
  9. Belson J., ‘Ecolabels: Ownership, Use, and the Public Interest’ (2012) 7(2) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 96 - 106 google scholar
  10. Belson J., ‘Environmental Trademarks’ (2014) 104(3) The Trademark Reporter 822 - 826 google scholar
  11. Berrone P. Fosfuri A. and Liliana Gelabert, ‘Does Greenwashing Pay Off? Understanding Between Environmental Actions and Environmental Legitimacy’ (2017) 144(2) Journal of Business Ethics 363 - 379 google scholar
  12. Birpınar M. E. Atay S. and Yetiş Ü., ‘Sürdürülebilir Üretim ve Tüketimde Eko-Etiketlerin Önemi: Türkiye Çevre Etiket Sistemi’ (2023) 3 Çevre Şehir ve İklim Dergisi 60 - 81 google scholar
  13. Eminoglu C., ‘The Principle of Uniqueness of Trademark Owner and the Examination of This Principle in the Context of Its Transfer (an Assessment in Context of the Decision of the Constitutional Court That Cancelled the Article 16/5 of the Decree No. 556)’ (2016) 1 YBHD 229 - 254 google scholar
  14. Ende L. Reinhard M.A. and Göritz L., ‘Detecting Greenwashing! The Influence of Products Colour and Product Price on Consumers’ Detection Accuracy of Faked Bio-fashion’ (2023) 46 Journal of Consumer Policy 155 - 189 google scholar
  15. Engels G. and Grubler U., ‘Sustainable Brands, Eco-Labels and the New EU Certification Mark’, (2017) 264 Managing Intellectual Property 88 - 91 google scholar
  16. Eşiyok E., ‘Türkiye’de Reklamların Denetimi: Reklam Kurulu Kararları Üzerinden Bir İnceleme’ (2018) 9/2 İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 593 - 606 google scholar
  17. Gallicano T.D., ‘A Critical Analysis of Greenwashing Claims’ (2011) 5(3) The Public Relations Journal 1 - 21 google scholar
  18. Gürbüz Güngör E., ‘Tüketicilerin Çevre Konusundaki Duyarlılığına Yönelik Reklamların Hukuki Açıdan İncelenmesi’ (2021) 12(1) Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi 21-50 google scholar
  19. Heh W., ‘Who Certifies the Ceritifers?’ (2015) 16(4) Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 688 - 715 google scholar
  20. Hetu J. M. and Owen Kramer A., ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green: Use of the Terms Organic, Sustainable, and Natural in Trademarks and Advertising’ (2011) 4(1) Landslide 46 - 57 google scholar
  21. Hotten R, ‘What is Volkswagen accused of?’ (bbc.com, 10 December 2015) accessed 31 July 2023 google scholar
  22. Innaou I., Kassinis G., Papagiannakis G., “The Impact of Percieved Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation” (2023) 185 Journal of Business Ethics 333 - 347 google scholar
  23. Iraldo F. Griesshammer R. and Kahlenborn W., ‘The Future of Ecolables’ (2020) 25 The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 833 - 839 google scholar
  24. Jain S. and Hagenbeek O., ‘2022 Global Sustainability Study: The Growth Potential of Environmental Change’ (simon-kucher.com, 23 October 2022) accessed 30 July 2023 google scholar
  25. Jessop S. Dickie G. and Mallet B., ‘Environmental groups sue TotalEnergies over climate marketing claims’ (reuters.com, 3 March 2022) accessed 31 July 2023 google scholar
  26. Kara İ.,Tüketici Hukuku, (Engin, 2015) google scholar
  27. Kaya A., Marka Hukuku (Arıkan 2006) google scholar
  28. Kraus D., ‘Green Marketing - ein Ansatz nachhaltiger Unternehmensführung aus Sicht des Marketings’ (2018) 4 Erfurter Hefte Zum Angewandten Marketing 1 - 42 google scholar
  29. Koyuncu A. Ç., Tüketici Hukuku Çerçevesinde Haksız Ticari Uygulamalar (Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2022) google scholar
  30. Lindberg S., ‘Aftonbladet’s investigation into H&M’s recycling in 9 points’ (aftonbladet.se, 13 June 2023) accessed 31 July 2023 google scholar
  31. McQueen C. L., ‘Certified Green: Using Subsets of Trademark law to Bring Legitimacy to the Eco-Friendly Products Market’ (2016) 7(2) Journal of Animal & Environmental 100 - 124 google scholar
  32. Mogyoros A., ‘Improving eco-labels: are green certification marks up to the task?’ (2023) 18(5) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 367 - 374 google scholar
  33. Pattie K. Cane A., ‘Green Marketing: legend, myth, farce or propesy?’ (2005) 8(4) Qualitative Market Research 357 - 370 google scholar
  34. Rusko M. and Koraus A., ‘Type I, II and III of Ecolabels’ (2013) 2(1) Journal of Environmental Protection, Safety, Education and Management 1 - 10 google scholar
  35. Sheehan K., ‘This Ain’t Your Daddy’s Greenwashing: An Assessment of the American Petroleum Institute’s Power Past Impossible Campaign’ (2018) Intellectual Property and Clean Energy 301 - 321 google scholar
  36. Şişman Aydın G., ‘Eko-Etiketleme ve Türkiye Çevre Etiketi’ (2019) 4(1) Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 40 - 47 google scholar
  37. Tekinalp Ü, Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku (Vedat 2012) google scholar
  38. Thiele L., Systemic Accumulation and Cost Re-Externalizations in the Green Economy (1st edn Freie Universitaet Berlin (Germany) ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2020) google scholar
  39. Uzunallı S., Avrupa Birliği’ne Uyum Sürecinde Markanın Köken Ayırt Etme İşlevi ile Bağlantılı Kavramların Yorumu ’Köken Ayırt Etme’ (Çağa 2008) google scholar
  40. Watson T., ‘Green Marketing: It’s not All Bunnies and Flowers’ (2010) 27(6) Intellectual Property Law 34 - 35 google scholar
  41. Zevkliler A./Özel Ç, Tüketicinin Korunması Hukuku (Seçkin 2016 google scholar
  42. ‘Buying Green for Consumers’ accessed 3 August 2023 google scholar
  43. ‘Companies Accused of Greenwashing-When companies green it, they better mean it’ (truthindadvertising.org, 13 June 2023) accessed 02 August 2023 google scholar
  44. ‘Eco-label index’ accessed 3 August 2023 google scholar
  45. European Commision Directorate General Environement Circular Economy, Sustainable Production and Consumption ‘Strategic EU Eco-label, Work Plan 2020 - 2024’ 2020, 3 accessed 9 August 2023 google scholar
  46. Introduction to Ecolabels and Standards for Greener Products (epa.gov 12 September 2022) accessed 31 July 2023 google scholar
  47. ISO 14024:1999 Environmental labels and declarations — Type I environmental labelling — Principles and procedures (iso.org, March 1999) accessed 1 August 2023 google scholar
  48. ‘ISO 14024:1999 Environmental labels and declarations — Type I environmental labelling — Principles and procedures’ (iso.org, March 1999) accessed 1 August 2023 google scholar
  49. ‘ISO 14024:2018(en), Environmental labels and declarations — Type I environmental labelling — Principles and procedures’ (iso.org, February 2018) art 3.1 google scholar
  50. ‘ISO 14021:2016(en) Environmental labels and declarations — Self-declared environmental claims (Type II environmental labelling)’ (March 2016) accessed 1 August 2023 google scholar
  51. ‘ISO 14025:2006(en) Environmental labels and declarations — Type III environmental declarations — Principles and procedures’ (July 2006) accessed 1 August 2023 google scholar
  52. ‘Ecolabel with history’ accessed 2 August 2023 google scholar
  53. ‘Life Cycle Assessment’ accessed 1 August 2023 google scholar
  54. ‘Meausuring Fashion, Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries Study’ accessed 21 September 2023 google scholar
  55. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, accessed 30 July 2023 google scholar
  56. ‘Rainforest Alliance’ accessed 3 August 2023 google scholar
  57. The Guideline For Environmental Claims In Advertising, (tuketici.ticaret.gov.tr, 2023) accessed 31 July 2023 google scholar
  58. Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu Çevrimiçi Arama Motoru (turkpatent.gov.tr, August 2023) www.turkpatent.gov.tr/arastirma-yap?form=trademark> accessed 4 August 2023 google scholar
  59. Turkish Republic Ministry of Trade, Çevreye İlişkin Beyanlar İçeren Reklamlar Hakkında Kılavuz (tüketici.ticaret.gov.tr, August 2023) accessed 01 August 2023 google scholar
  60. Turkish Trademark and Patent Office, Marka İnceleme Kılavuzu (turkpatent.gov.tr, August 2023) accessed 01 August 2023. google scholar
  61. ‘Yeşil Mutabakat Eylem Planı ve Yeşil Mutabakat Çalışma Grubu 2022 Faaliyet Raporu’ (ticaret. gov.tr 2022) accessed 31 July 2023. google scholar