Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İLEF Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Streaming Media Platforms: Social Implications of the Transformation of Audience Activity

Süreğen MedyaPlatformları:İzleyici Etkinliğinin Dönüşümü veToplumsal Etkileri

Pages
109–132
Publication Date
2023-10-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, we discuss the novel conditions imposed on viewers bystreaming media platforms at a conceptual and theoretical level and interrogate their impact on public life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Streaming media platforms are increasingly replacing cinema and television as the dominant means ofnarrative-content distribution, yet viewing media on these platforms differs in important ways from cin ema and television spectatorship, both through the narrative and interactive possibilities they allow, butalso through the temporal and spatial conditions they impose on audiences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the help of the mobilemedia technologies they are delivered through, streaming media platforms free audiences from the tem poral and spatial limitations of cinema and television and offer a continuous yet isolated viewing experi ence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, we discuss the novel conditions imposed on viewers bystreaming media platforms at a conceptual and theoretical level and interrogate their impact on public life.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Streaming media platforms are increasingly replacing cinema and television as the dominant means ofnarrative-content distribution, yet viewing media on these platforms differs in important ways from cin ema and television spectatorship, both through the narrative and interactive possibilities they allow, butalso through the temporal and spatial conditions they impose on audiences. With the help of the mobilemedia technologies they are delivered through, streaming media platforms free audiences from the tem poral and spatial limitations of cinema and television and offer a continuous yet isolated viewing experi ence. Algorithmically regulated and customized program flow and the accompanying illusion of interac tivity create a “privatized” viewing experience which contrasts with the “publicness” and “collectiveness”of that of cinema and television. In this article, we discuss the novel conditions imposed on viewers bystreaming media platforms at a conceptual and theoretical level and interrogate their impact on public life.

Özet

Süreğen medya platformları, günümüzde anlatısal metinler için televizyon ve sinemayı ikame edecek yeni bir dolaşım/dağıtım biçimi olarak ortaya çıkıyor. Fakat bu dolaşım biçimine has izleme etkinliğinin zamansal ve mekânsal koşulları ve ön plana çıkardığı anlatısal aygıtlar, onu geçmişteki sinema ve televizyon izleyiciliğinden farklı şekilde yapılandırıyor. Süreğen medya platformları, taşınabilir medya teknolojilerinin de yardımıyla, izleyici etkinliğini zamansal ve mekânsal kısıtlarından kurtarıp sürekli, her yerde ve her zaman ulaşılabilir hale getiriyor. Bu pratik, sadece sinema ve televizyon izleyiciliğinin kurucu niteliği olan kamusallığın uzağında, yalıtılmış, sterilize bir iletişim tecrübesi yaratmakla kalmıyor; ilk bakışta kişisel ve kişiye özel gibi görünen bu yeni iletişim süreci esasında algoritmik süreçler aracılığıyla düzenlenerek platform kapitalizminin kontrol aygıtlarından birine dönüşüyor. Bu yazıda amacımız süreğen medya platformlarının dayattığı bu yeni izleyici etkinliğinin içinde kurulduğu koşulları kuramsal düzeyde analiz etmek ve bu koşulların kamusal yaşama etkisini sorgulamaya girişmek.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜN, A., TRESKE, A. (2023). Streaming Media Platforms: Social Implications of the Transformation of Audience Activity. Ankara Üniversitesi İLEF Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 109–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/1018817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ang, Ien. 1996. Living Room Wars: Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World. New York and London: Routledge. Brantner, Chris. “More Americans Now Pay For Streaming Services Than Cable TV.” Forbes, 20 Mart, 2019. Erişim Tarihi 4 Şubat 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ chrisbrantner/2019/03/20/americans-now-pay-more-for-streaming-services-thancable-tv/#496a133fcdd2 Bourdieu, Pierre. 2007. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
  2. Van Buskirk, Eliot. 2009. “How the Netflix Prize Was Won.” Wired, 22 Eylül, 2009. Erişim Tarihi 4 Şubat 2020. https://www.wired.com/2009/09/how-the-netflix-prize-was-won/
  3. Cavell, Stanley. 1982. “The Fact of Television.” Daedalus, Vol.111, No. 4, Print Culture and Video Culture (Güz 1982), pp. 75-96
  4. Çetindağ, Selin, Sevda Ünal, Mutlu Binark. 2018. “Televizyon Endüstrisinde Yeni Yayıncılık Ekosistemi Ve “İkinci Ekran” Olgusu: İçerde Dizisi Örneği”. Kolektif Zeka. der. Oya Morva, Erkan Saka, Kalkedon, p. 123-169
  5. Schofield Clark, Lynn. 2014. “Mobile Media in the Emotional and Moral Economies of the Household.” The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media. der. Gerard Goggin, Larissa Hjorth, Routledge Dayan, Daniel, Elihu Katz. 1992. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Harvard University Press Eco, Umberto. 1994. Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Harvard University Press Feuer, Jane. 1983. “The Concept of Live Television: Ontology as Ideology”, Regarding Television. Critical Approaches-An Anthology, ed. Ann Kaplan. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America. Glebatis Perks, Lisa. 2014. Media Marathoning: Immersions in Morality. London: Lexington Books Goggin, Gerard. 2014. “Mobile Video: Spreading Stories with Mobile Media.” The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media. der. Gerard Goggin, Larissa Hjorth, Routledge Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press Hall, Stuart. 1982. “The rediscovery of ‘ideology: return of the repressed in media studies.” Culture, Society and the Media, der. Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, Janet Woollacott, Routledge, London and New York, p. 52-87
  6. Hall, Stuart. 1977. “Culture, the Media and the ‘Ideological Effect’.” Mass Communication and Society, der. J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Wollacott. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 315- 48. Hall, Stuart. 2009. “Encoding/Decoding.” Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks der. Durham, Meenakshi G