SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Turizm Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

QUALITY PERCEPTIONS OF IRANIAN TOURISTS’ VISITING PROVINCE OF VAN / TURKEY

İbrahim ÇETİN
Zafer ÖTER
Fikret GÜRSES
Pages
122–129
Publication Date
2019-01-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Each item constituted to measure the quality perceptionsof tourists related to evaluation of natural, cultural and other potential attractions of Van as tourism products.Items which gain the highest and the least score as the perceptions of the tourists are explained at the result of theanalysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As an amalgam element of tourist experiences and preferences the concept of destination quality hasgained a great attention in the past.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quality has considerable impacts on the destination competitiveness and asthe result on the satisfaction and revisit intentions of the visitors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Each item constituted to measure the quality perceptionsof tourists related to evaluation of natural, cultural and other potential attractions of Van as tourism products.Items which gain the highest and the least score as the perceptions of the tourists are explained at the result of theanalysis.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Destination quality · Iranian tourist perceptions · Tourism product

Abstract

As an amalgam element of tourist experiences and preferences the concept of destination quality hasgained a great attention in the past. Quality has considerable impacts on the destination competitiveness and asthe result on the satisfaction and revisit intentions of the visitors. It has a persistent impact rather than a tentativeimpact on the destinations’ tourist flow patterns. This research reviews the literature and highlights wholly or partlythe quality of destination as a tourism product which is offered to tourists and creates regular demand. Quality isa crucial concept that can provide insights on the way they are viewed and perceived by the tourists ultimatelyas customers visiting and using artificial and auxiliary service produced in the destination. This paper aims toexplore the tourist perceptions related to Van City of Turkey as most popular destination visited by Iranian tourists.The study uses primary data collected from the visitors through the questionnaire form which structured as anempirically in Likert form from the scales in literature. Each item constituted to measure the quality perceptionsof tourists related to evaluation of natural, cultural and other potential attractions of Van as tourism products.Items which gain the highest and the least score as the perceptions of the tourists are explained at the result of theanalysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, İ., ÖTER, Z., GÜRSES, F. (2019). QUALITY PERCEPTIONS OF IRANIAN TOURISTS’ VISITING PROVINCE OF VAN / TURKEY. Uluslararası Turizm Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 122–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/1014231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aho, S. K. (2001) “Towards a general theory of touristic experiences: Modelling experience process in tourism”, Tourism Review, Vol. 56 Issue: 3/4, pp.33-37, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058368.
  2. Bostan, A. (2013). Ülke Kalkınmasında Marmaris Turizm Sektörünün Önemi ve Rus Turistlerin Marmaris’i Tercih Etme Nedenleri, International Conference On Eurasian Economies, 711-720.
  3. Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future, Tourism Management, 21, pp. 97-116. Cabael T. G., (2011) “Destinasyon Yönetim Organizasyonu Üzerine Bir Model önerisi”, Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla. Çetin, İ. (2017a). «Yeni Gelişen Turistik Destinasyonlar ve Van’ı Ziyaret Eden İranlı Turistlerin Özellikleri”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 2017, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, Sayfa 44-59.
  4. Çetin, İ. (2017b). Factors Affecting The Tourism Demand At New Emerging Tourist Destinations: Case of Van, III. IBANESS Kongreler Serisi – Edirne / Türkiye, 04-05 Mart 2017.
  5. Çetin, İ. (2016). Brand Equity and its Impacts on Consumer Repurchase Intentions in the:Hospitality Industry, Proceedings Of III. Internatıonal Cesme-Chios History, Culture And Tourism Symposium 03-04
  6. November, Çeşme-Türkiye. Chen, F.C. ve Tsai, D., C. (2007). How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions?, Tourism Management 28, pp. 1115–1122.
  7. Chi, C. G. and Qu, H. (2008). Examining The Structural Relationships of Destination Image, Tourist Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty:An Integrated Approach. Tourism Management, 29, 624–636.
  8. Crompton, J. L. (1979).
  9. Motivations for pleasure vacation, Annals of Tourism Research,6(4), 408-424.
  10. Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. Journal of tourism studies, 2(2), 2-12.
  11. Gallarza, M. G., Saura, I. G., & Garcı́a, H. C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework.Annals of tourism research, 29(1), 56-78.
  12. Getz, D. (1989).
  13. Special events, Defining the product, Tourism management, 10 (2), 125-137.
  14. Hacıoğlu, N. (2016).
  15. Turizm Pazarlaması, Nobel Akademik yayıncılık, Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti, 11.basım, Ankara.
  16. Hayta, A.B. (2008). Turizm Pazarlamasında Tüketici Satın Alma Süreci ve Karşılaşılan Sorunlar, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt:16 No:1 31-48.
  17. Hosany, S., Ekinci, Y., & Uysal, M. (2006). Destination image and destination personality, An application of branding theories to tour