Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Comparison Of Tap Water With Bottled Natural Spring Water in Terms Of Some Quality Parameters in Erzurum

Pages
27–32
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Public’s interest to bottled water has increased due to the difficulties in access to drinkable water in recent years, desire of consume to healthy water, changes in consumers preferences in the last years.In this study, some physical, chemical, and microbiological quality parameters of Erzurum tap water and bottled spring water which is sold in Erzurum market are examined according to the national and international standards, compared and obtained results are evaluatedIt is evaluated that although tap water parametric values are generally higher than bottled water, both tap water and bottled water are safety and healthy water in terms of examined parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supplying healthy drinking water to meet the growing population needs is one of today’s priority issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drinking water requirement in cities is largely met by the network water obtained by the treatment of surface waters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Public’s interest to bottled water has increased due to the difficulties in access to drinkable water in recent years, desire of consume to healthy water, changes in consumers preferences in the last years.In this study, some physical, chemical, and microbiological quality parameters of Erzurum tap water and bottled spring water which is sold in Erzurum market are examined according to the national and international standards, compared and obtained results are evaluatedIt is evaluated that although tap water parametric values are generally higher than bottled water, both tap water and bottled water are safety and healthy water in terms of examined parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:tap water · bottled spring water · Erzurum province

Özet

Supplying healthy drinking water to meet the growing population needs is one of today’s priority issues. Drinking water requirement in cities is largely met by the network water obtained by the treatment of surface waters. Public’s interest to bottled water has increased due to the difficulties in access to drinkable water in recent years, desire of consume to healthy water, changes in consumers preferences in the last years.In this study, some physical, chemical, and microbiological quality parameters of Erzurum tap water and bottled spring water which is sold in Erzurum market are examined according to the national and international standards, compared and obtained results are evaluatedIt is evaluated that although tap water parametric values are generally higher than bottled water, both tap water and bottled water are safety and healthy water in terms of examined parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

TULUK, B., ORHAN, F. (2017). Comparison Of Tap Water With Bottled Natural Spring Water in Terms Of Some Quality Parameters in Erzurum. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/1000782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ogur R, Tekbaş OF. 2008. İçme ve kullanma sularının kullanımında dikkat edilecek hususlar. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 7 (3) Demirci AS, Gumus T, Demırcı M. 2007. Damacana suların mikrobiyolojik kalitesi üzerine pompa temizliğinin etkisi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 4(3): 271-275.
  2. Ikıkat Tumer E, Bırıncı A, Yıldırım C. 2011. Ambalajlı su tüketimini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi:Ankara ili Keçiören ilçesi örneği. Alınteri 21(B): 11-19.
  3. Uzundumlu AS, Fakıoğlu O, Kokturk M, Temel T. 2016. Erzurum İlinde En Uygun İçme Suyu Tercihinin Belirlenmesi. Alınteri 30(B): 1-7.
  4. Yılmaz M, Bolu F, Mayda AS, Poyraz B. 2017. Düzce’de Satılan Şişe Suları İle Musluk Sularının Ağır Metal Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi 9(1): 24-29.
  5. Bharadwaj ND, Uchharia DK, Jain R. 2016. Physical-Chemical Analysis of Drinking Water of Government Hospitals of Gwalior City. IRJET. 3(03): 1578-1582.
  6. Koksal F, Samastı M. 2007. Istanbul’ da polikarbonat damacanalarda satılan içme sularının bakteriyolojik incelenmesi. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 37(4): 221-224.
  7. Süphandag SA, Uyguner CS, Bekbölet M. 2007. İstanbul’da tüketilen ticari ve şebeke bazlı içme sularının kimyasal ve spektroskopik profilleri. itü dergisi. 17(2): 23-35. Oymakaydın OF. 2011. Aydın ilinde tüketilen şişelenmiş suların mikrobiyolojik kalitesi üzerine bir çalışma. Yüksek lisans tezi. Adnan menderes üniversitesi sağlık bilimler enstitüsü besin hijyeni anabilim dalı. 52 s. WHO. 2011. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th Edıtıon, World Health Organisation, Geneva. Körbalta H. 2015. Türkiye’ de bölgesel ve kentsel düzeyde su yoksulluğunun ölçülebilmesi için bir yöntem önerisi. Doktora Tezi. Gazi üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü şehir ve bölge planlama anabilim dalı. 242 s. Taşkın T. 2009. Osmanlı sakalarından modern sakalara: ticarileşen damacana sektörü. Memleket siyaset yönetim. 4(10): 76-92.
  8. Rahmanian N, Ali SH, Homayoonfard M, Ali NJ, Rehan M, Sadef Y, Nizami AS. 2015. Analysis of Physiochemical Parameters to Evaluate the Drinking Water Quality in the State of Perak, Malaysia. Journal of Chemistry. Volume 2015, Article ID 716125, 10 p. URL 1. www.suder.org.tr. Retrieved Sept. 28, 2017, from http://www.suder.org.tr/sektor. URL 2. www. erzurum. bel.tr. Retrieved Oct. 23, 2017, from http://www.eski.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/pdfsu/23-10.pdf URL 3. The United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/n