Antibakteriyel Ajan İlave Edilen Cam İyonomer Simanda Isı Uygulamasının Florür Salımına Etkisi

THE EFFECT OF HEAT APPLICATION ON FLUORIDE RELEASE FROM ANTIBACTERIAL AGENT ADDED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT

Münevver Sökmen, Ayça Kurt, Sema Aydınoğlu, Tamer Tüzüner, İlkay Altıntepe

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı konvansiyonel yapıda olan ve %5 cetylpryridium chloride (CPC) ile kombine edilen cam iyonomer simanda (CİS) florür (F− ) salımına, ısının etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: %5 cetylpryridium chloride (CPC) ile kombine edilen deney ve %5 CPC içermeyen kontrol grubundan oluşan yirmi adet (n=5; her grupta) CİS örneği hazırlandı. Örneklerden 10 tanesine ısı uygulanmadı (IU), diğer 10 tanesine ise 60 sn Light Emitting Diode (LED) ışık kaynağı ile oluşturulan ısı etkisi (IE) altında uygulama yapıldı. Bir, 7, 15 ve 30. günlerdeki F − salımı gözlendi. Karşılaştırmalar için iki yönlü ANOVA ve Fisher’s LSD testinin tekrarlanan ölçümleri kullanıldı (p

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of heat on the fluoride (F−) releasingability of glass ionomer cement (GIC) when used in the conventional form and whencombined with 5% cetylpryridium chloride (CPC).Materials and Methods: Twenty (n=5; each group) GIC samples were prepared, withthe experimental group comprising GIC combined with 5% CPC and the control groupcomprising GIC without 5% CPC. The samples were prepared by non-heating (NH)procedures (n = 10) or by heating (H) for 60 seconds (n = 10) with a Light EmittingDiode (LED). Flouride releasing pattern was evaluated on days 1, 7, 15 and 30.Repeated measurements using two-way ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD test were used forcomparisons (p < 0.05).Results: Interactions among the groups, application of heat, and the time at which F−release was evaluated were analyzed (p < 0.001). There was no significant differencein F−release in the NH control and experimental groups on days 1, 7 and 15; howevera significant release was evident in the experimental group on day 30 (p=0.01).Significantly higher values were obtained in the H associated control group than in theexperimental group on days 1 (p=0.026), 7 (p = 0.001), 15 (p=0.005) and 30 (p=0.028).Significantly increased values were obtained from days 1 to 30 by NH and H proceduresfor both the groups (p