Dergiler / Ankara Barosu Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 3
Hart-Fuller Tartışması, Neden Anlaşamıyorlar?
- Sayfa
- 103–150
- DOI
- —
Özet
H.L.A. Hart ve Lon L. Fuller arasındaki tartışma hukuk felsefesi alanında
Abstract
The debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller occupies an important placein the philosophy of law. The debate is generally known as the debate betweenHart and Fuller in the Harvard Law Review in 1958. However, the debatecontinues until 1969 through the works of Hart and Fuller. In the traditionof legal philosophy, the debate has been read through the perspective of Hart.Today we can talk about a Fuller Renaissance, that is, a revival of interest inFuller’s work. Fuller Renaissance gives us the opportunity to read the debatewithin the framework of Fuller’s thought. Therefore, in this article I will read thedebate through the perspective of Fuller. Firstly, I will explore the points thesetwo scholars cannot agree upon, and, secondly, I will consider the importancethese issues hold for legal philosophy.