Liderlik Uygulamalarının İçsel Okul Değişkenleri ile Öğrenci Çıktı Değişkenlerine Etkisi

The Effect of Leadership Practices on Organizational Learning and Student Outcomes in Turkish High Schools

Özet

Bu çalışma, öğrenci çıktı değişkenleri üzerinde içsel okul değişkenleri ile örgütsel öğrenmenin doğasının bir etkisinin olup olmayacağını araştırmaktadır. Başka bir ifade ile örgütsel öğrenmenin doğası üzerinde okulda uygulanan liderlik uygulamaları ile içsel okul değişkenlerinin hangi düzeyde etkili olup olmadığı araştırılacaktır. Bunun için Ankara ili merkez ilçelerinde yer alan 21 genel lise ile bu liselerde görev yapan 257 öğretmen ve farklı sınıflarda okuyan 322 öğrenciye 5 dereceli likert tipinde bir ölçek uygulanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki doğudan ve dolaylı ilişkileri açıklamak için Path analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgular göstermektedir ki, paylaşılmış liderlik uygulamaları, liderlik doyumu, kaynak, öğretmen liderliği ve personelin kendisine değer verildiği duygusuna sahip olması gibi içsel okul değişkenleri okulun örgütsel öğrenmesi üzerinde etkili birer faktör olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, öğrenci çıktı değişkeni olarak ifade edilen öğrenci katılımı ve bağlılığı üzerinde, öğretmenlerin işi değişkeninin etkili bir güçlü faktör olduğudur.

Abstract

This study attempts to find out if internal school variables and the nature of organizational learning have an effect on student outcome variables. In other words, on which level the leadership styles applied in the schools and if internal school variables have an effect on the nature of organizational learning. For this reason, a five-item Likert type scale was administered to 257 teachers and 322 students in different classes of 21 general high schools in the centre of the province of Ankara. In order to explain the direct and indirect relations among the variables a Path analysis was used. The findings after the analysis show that internal school variables such as shared leadership, leadership satisfaction, source, teacher leadership and the staffs' feeling valued are effective factors on school's organizational learning. Moreover, teachers' work is an effective and strong factor on student's participation which is also described as student outcome variable. Summary Social, political and economical changes have caused changes in organizational structures. These changes and indefiniteness have increased the importance of efforts in bringing about learning organizations. For general Turkish high schools which are a part of secondary education institutions, it is impossible to show no reaction towards the changes taking place in their surroundings. High schools must be learning organizations to successfully accomplish their goals. A learning organization is capable of creating; acquiring, commenting, transferring, and keeping knowledge (David and Garvin, 2000). Learning organizations are both more productive and adaptive than traditional organizations. In order to develop such organizations vision, patience and courage are obviously needed (Kofman and Senge, 1993). In school structures, there are many different elements affecting organizational learning process. These elements are (1) factors outside the school which express students' socio-economic level and social class background, (2) internal school variables which express leadership, staff valued, leadership satisfaction, school-community relations, organizational learning and teachers work; and (3) student outcome variables that represents students' participation and school commitment (Kale, 2003; Silins and Mulford, 2004). The relations among these variables are complex and they affect each other mutually. Studies done in this subject in Turkish context are generally about the determining schools' organizational learning level (Kale, 2003; Çelik, 1999; Ensari, 1998) or are about determining schools' organizational learning obstacles (Töremen, 2001). However, in Turkey limited studies have been done on if internal school variables and the nature of organizational learning have an effect on student achievement. In other words, at which level leadership styles in the school and internal school variables are effective on the nature of organizational learning. For this reason, this study seeks answers to the following questions: 1)As learning organizations; what are the characteristics of high schools? 2)Do leadership practices have effects on the development of learning organizations? 3)Do leadership practices and the nature of organizational learning have an effect on students' outcomes? Method Data were collected from randomly selected 21 high school principals, 257 teachers and 322 students in different classes of these high schools. Data were collected via ‘Administrator and Teacher Questionnaire' adapted from the questionnaire used in “Leadership for organizational learning and student outcomes: The LOLSO Project” study (Silins, Mulford and Zarins, 1999). Data were collected via ‘Administrator and Teacher Questionnaire' adapted from the questionnaire used in “Leadership for Organizational Learning and Student Outcomes: The LOLSO Project” study (Silins, Mulford and Zarins, 1999). The original sample of the scale consists of two different groups prepared to obtain data from the teachers and the students which form the sample of the study. The first part of the scale is the ‘Teacher and Principal Questionnaire' which contains the defining of schools that are associated with high schools operating as learning organizations and leadership characters and process applied in these schools. This questionnaire consists of four dimensions which characterise high schools as learning organizations and these are 1.Trusting and Colloboration, 2.Shared and Monitored Mission, 3.Taking initiatives and risks, and 4.Professional Development. The alpha validity coefficient of the sample is between .90 and. 96. ‘The Leadership Scale' which exsists in the same scale and which is prepared to determine the leadership applications which enrich the organizational learning and these are 1.Vision and Goals,2.Culture,3.Structure,4.Intellectual Stimulation,5.Individual Support, and 6.Performance Expectations. The alpha validity coefficient is between .70 and .98. The second phase of the scale used in the study to obtain data is the ‘Student Questionnaire' which defines student's views of teachers' work in the classroom and student outcomes such as attendance, students' self-concept, and participation in and engagement with schools. The alpha validity coefficient is between .51 and .90. Results and Findings In order to test the direct and indirect relations among the variables, Path analysis, which is a structural equality analysis, was used. The reason for this is to be able to make logical explanations of observed correlations by forming the models reason-result relations among the variables. The most important finding after structural equality analysis is that leadership style (β=.46, p<.05), staff valued (β=.23, p<.05), resource (β=.14, p<.05), leadership satisfaction (β=.19, p<.05) and teacher leadership (β= .24, p<.05) affect organizational learning. In other words, these five variables

Anahtar kelimeler: Örgütsel öğrenme , öğretmen liderliği , dönüşümsel liderlik , öğrenen örgüt.