KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Milli Eğitim Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 53 Sayı: 241

Öğretmen Adaylarının Rasyonel Sayılara İlişkin Zihin Haritaları: Pirie-Kieren Teorisi

Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps on Rational Numbers: Pirie-Kieren Theory

Sare Şengül(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1069-9084
Büşra Kıral Demir(İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5816-6183
Sayfa
133–164
Yayın Tarihi
2024-02-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme sonuçları ile beraber süreç göz önüne alındığında ise öğretmen adaylarının “görüntüye sahip olma”, “özelliği fark etme” ve “soyutlama” katmanları arasında ileri geri katlamalar yaparak bilgilerini yapılandırma çabası gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırmanın amacı, ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının, rasyonel sayılar kavramına ilişkin matematiksel anlama düzeylerinin Pirie-Kieren teorisine göre incelenmesidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme sonuçları ile beraber süreç göz önüne alındığında ise öğretmen adaylarının “görüntüye sahip olma”, “özelliği fark etme” ve “soyutlama” katmanları arasında ileri geri katlamalar yaparak bilgilerini yapılandırma çabası gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bu alandaki araştırmacılar için öneriler geliştirilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pirie-Kieren teorisi · kavramsal anlama · rasyonel sayılar

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının, rasyonel sayılar kavramına ilişkin matematiksel anlama düzeylerinin Pirie-Kieren teorisine göre incelenmesidir. Araştırma, İstanbul ilindeki bir üniversitenin ilköğretim matematik öğretmenliği programında öğrenim görmekte olan üç öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Öğretmen adayları “Matematiğin Temelleri”, “Ortaokul Matematik Öğretim Programları” ve “Sayıların Öğretimi” derslerini almış, akademik başarıları yüksek ve iyi düzeyde olan iletişim becerileri yüksek, gönüllü öğretmen adayları arasından seçilmiştir. Araştırma, durum çalışması desenine göre tasarlanmıştır. Veriler, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilmiş rasyonel sayılar kavramına ilişkin dört açık uçlu sorudan oluşan rasyonel sayılar kavram testi ve yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmelerle toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, Pirie-Kieren anlama katmanlarına göre analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının ağırlıklı olarak “görüntü oluşturma” katmanında bulundukları belirlenmiştir. Yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme sonuçları ile beraber süreç göz önüne alındığında ise öğretmen adaylarının “görüntüye sahip olma”, “özelliği fark etme” ve “soyutlama” katmanları arasında ileri geri katlamalar yaparak bilgilerini yapılandırma çabası gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının Pirie-Kieren teorik modeline göre zihin haritaları oluşturularak sonuçlar tartışılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bu alandaki araştırmacılar için öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the mathematical understanding levels of secondary school mathematics teacher candidates regarding the concept of rational numbers according to the Pirie-Kieren theory. The research was carried out with three pre-service teachers studying in a university in Istanbul's primary school mathematics teaching program. The pre-service teachers were selected from among volunteer pre-service teachers with a high and good level of academic achievement and high communication skills who took the courses "Basics of Mathematics", "Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum", and "Teaching Numbers". The research was designed according to the case study pattern. The data were collected through a rational numbers concept test consisting of four open-ended questions on the concept of rational numbers developed by the researchers and semi-structured interviews. The obtained data were analyzed according to the Pirie-Kieren comprehension layers. The study determined that pre-service teachers were mostly in the "image creation" layer. Considering the process together with the semi-structured interview results, it was determined that the pre-service teachers tried to construct their knowledge by folding back and forth between the layers of "having the image", "noticing the feature", and "abstraction". In addition, pre-service teachers' mind maps were created according to the Pirie-Kieren theoretical model, and the results were discussed. According to the results obtained, suggestions have been developed for researchers in this field.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şengül, S., Demir, B. K. (2024). Öğretmen Adaylarının Rasyonel Sayılara İlişkin Zihin Haritaları: Pirie-Kieren Teorisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 53 Sayı: 241, 133–164. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1141497

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (56)

  1. Alajmi, A., and Reys, R. (2007). Reasonable and reasonableness of answers: Kuwaiti middle school teachers’ perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(5), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9042-4
  2. Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T., and Silver E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, (pp. 91-125). Academic Press.
  3. Borgen, K. L., and Manu, S. S. (2002). What do students really understand?. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00115-3
  4. Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. Elementary School Journal, 47(5), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1086/462322
  5. Coe, R., and Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students. British Educational Research Journal, 20, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192940200105
  6. Çelik, B. (2006). Temel matematik. Nobel.
  7. Düzenli-Gökalp, N., and Bulut, S. (2018). A new form of understanding maps: Multiple representations with Pirie and Kieren model of understanding. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(6), 1-21.
  8. Düzenli-Gökalp, N., and Sharma, M. D. (2010). A study on addition and subtraction of fractions: The use of Pirie and Kieren model and hands-on activities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5168-5171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.840
  9. Ellerbruch, L. W., and Payne, J. N. (1978). A teaching sequence for initial fraction concepts through the addition of unlike fractions. In M. Suydam (Eds.), Developing computational skills. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  10. Glaser, R. (1991). The maturing of the relationship between the science of learning and cognition and educational practice. Learning and Instruction, 1(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(91)90023-2
  11. Gülkılık, H., Uğurlu, H. H., and Yürük, N. (2015). Examining students’ mathematical understanding of geometric transformations using the Pirie-Kieren model. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1531-1548.
  12. Hakim, F., and Murtafiah, M. (2022, 8 December). Undergraduate students’ levels of understanding in solving mathematical proof problem: The use of Pirie-Kieren theory. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2575, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108699
  13. Healy, L., and Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/749651
  14. Kamii, C., and Clark, F. B. (1995). Equivalent fractions: Their difficulty and educational implications. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90035-7
  15. Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. Lesh (Eds.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop, (pp. 101-144). ERIC/SMEAC.
  16. Kieren, T. E. (1981). Five faces of mathematical knowledge building. Department of Secondary Education, University of Alberta.
  17. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. O., and Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
  18. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
  19. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for Research. In F. K. Lester (Eds.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-667). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  20. Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and ınstructional strategies for teachers (4. Ed.). Newgen Publishing UK.
  21. Lawan, A. (2011, 11-15 Jully). Growth of students’understanding of part-whole sub-construct of rational number on the layers of Pirie-Kieren theory [Long Papers]. 17. National Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa (AMESA) (pp. 69-80), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
  22. López-Martín, M. D. M., Aguayo-Arriagada, C. G., and García López, M. D. M. (2022). Preservice elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge on fractions as operator in word problems. Mathematics, 10(3), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030423
  23. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understandings of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  24. Mack, N. K. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for research in mathematics education, 26(5), 422-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/749431
  25. Martin, L. C. (2008). Folding back and the dynamical growth of mathematical understanding: Elaborating the Pirie-Kieren Theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(1), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.04.001
  26. Martin, W. G., and Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/749097
  27. Martinie, S. L. (2007). Middle school rational number knowledge [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kansas State University.
  28. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
  29. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı ve kılavuzu. MEB Basımevi.
  30. Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080-1110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208320851
  31. Niven, I. (1961). Numbers: Rational and irrational. Mathematical Association of America.
  32. Nopa, J. R., Suryadi, D., and Hasanah, A. (2019, February). The 9th grade students’ mathematical understanding in problem solving based on Pirie-Kieren theory. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 4), IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042122
  33. Peñaloza, J. A., and Vásquez, F. M. R. (2022). Understanding ratio through the Pirie-Kieren model. Acta Scientiae, 24(4), 24-56. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6826
  34. Pinto, M., and Tall, D. (1996). Student teachers' conceptions of the rational numbers. In Published in Proceedings of PME 20 (Vol. 4, pp. 139-146), Valencia.
  35. Pirie, S., and T. Kieren (1991). A dynamic theory of mathematical understanding: Some features and implications. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  36. Pirie, S., and Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273662
  37. Pouta, M., Lehtinen, E., and Palonen, T. (2021). Student teachers’ and experienced teachers’ professional vision of students’ understanding of the rational number concept. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09536-y
  38. Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., McIntosh, A., Emanuelsson, G., Johansson, B., and Yang, D. C. (1999). Assessing number sense of students in Australia, Sweden, Taiwan and the United States. School Science and Mathematics, 99(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17449.x
  39. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1258
  40. Simon, M. A. (2002). Focusing on key developmental understandings in mathematics. Learning, 24, 990.
  41. Simon, M. A. (2006). Key developmental understandings in mathematics: A direction for investigating and establishing learning goals. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 8(4), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0804_1
  42. Stafylidou, S., and Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
  43. Star, J. R., and Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and conceptual knowledge: Exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828
  44. Syafiqoh, N., Amin, S. M., and Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018, November). Analysis of student’s understanding of exponential concept: a perspective of Pirie-Kieren theory. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1108, No. 1, p. 012022), IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012022
  45. Şengül, S., and Argat, A. (2015). The analysis of understanding factorial concept processes of 7th grade students who have low academic achievements with Pirie Kieren theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1263-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.398
  46. Şengül, S., and Göktepe Yıldız, S. (2016). An examination of the domain of multivariable functions using the Pirie-Kieren model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1533-1544. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040706
  47. Şengül, S., Kaba, Y., and Argat, A. (2016, 13-15 July). The analyis of understanding factorial concept processes of 7th grade students who have high academic achievements with Pirie-Kieren theory [Tam metin bildiri]. International Conference on New Horizons in Education (INTE 2016) (pp. 730-737).
  48. Towers, J. M. (1998). Teachers' interventions and the growth of students' mathematical understanding [Unpublished PhD thesis]. The University of British Columbia.
  49. Trance, N. J. C. (2017). Evaluating preservice teacher cognition over student mathematics misconception. The Science and Technology Research Journal, 12(1), 97-108.
  50. Valcarce, M. C., Martín, M. L. D., Astudillo, M. T. G., and Pérez, M. C. M. (2013). Comprensión del concepto de serie numérica a través del modelo de Pirie y Kieren. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias. Revista de İnvestigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 31(3), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v31n3.963
  51. Vula, E., and Kingji-Kastrati, J. (2018). Pre-service teacher procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions. In G. J. Stylianides and K. Hino (Eds.), Research advances in the mathematical education of pre-service elementary teachers, (pp. 111-123). Springer.
  52. Warner, L. B. (2008). How do students’ behaviors relate to the growth of their mathematical ideas?. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 206-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.07.002
  53. Wearne, D., and Hiebert, J. (1988). Constructing and using meaning for mathematical symbols: The case of decimal fractions. In J. Hiebert and M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades, (pp. 220-235). NCTM, and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  54. Yao, X. (2020). Characterizing learners’ growth of geometric understanding in dynamic geometry environments: A perspective of the Pirie–Kieren theory. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00069-1
  55. Yetim, S., ve Alkan, R. (2010). İlköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin rasyonel sayılar ve bu sayıların sayı doğrusundaki gösterimleri konusundaki yaygın yanlışları ve kavram yanılgıları. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 11, 87-109.
  56. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (5. Ed.). Sage.