KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme

“Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme”

Murat Çetin

Sayfa
141–156
Yayın Tarihi
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çetin, M. (2005). Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 141–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/1073201

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (42)

  1. BASSANINI, A. ve SCARPETTA, S. (2001), “Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries? Evidence From Pooled Mean-Group Estimates”, Economic Department Working Papers, No: 01/282.
  2. BECKER, Gary S. (1962), “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, LXX, 9-49.
  3. BECKER, Gary S. (1975), Human Capital, 2nd Edition, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  4. BERGLUND, Elisabet (1999), “Human Capital and Regional Entry of Firms”, Umeea Economic Studies 500, 1-22.
  5. BLACK, Dan, GATES, Gary, SANDERS, Seth ve TAYLOR, Lowell (1998), “Why Do Gay Men Live in San Fransisco?”, Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
  6. BLOOM, D.E., CANNING, D. ve SEVILLA, J .(2001), “The Effect of Health on Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence”, NBER Woking Paper Series, No. 8587, (November).
  7. BRUECKNER, Jan K., THISSE, Jacques, ZENOU, Yves (1999), “Why is Central Paris Rich and Downtown Detroit Poor? An Amenity-based Theory”, European Economic Review, 43, 91-107.
  8. CLARC, David E. ve COSGRAVE, James C., (1991), “Amenities Versus Labor Market Opportunities: Choosing the Optimal Distance to Move”, Journal of Regional Science, 31, 31 1-328.
  9. CLARC, David E. ve KAHN, James R. (1988), “The Social BeneŞts of Urban Cultural Amenities”, Journal of Regional Science, 28, 363-377.
  10. CROPPER, Maureen L. (1981), “The Value of Urban Amenities”, Journal of Regional Science, 21, 359-374.
  11. DAGUM, Camilo ve SLOTTJE, Daniel J. (2000), “A New Method to Estimate the Level and Distribution of Household Human Capital with Application”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 67-94.
  12. DENISON, E. F. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experiences in Nine Western Countries, Washington DC: Brookings.
  13. DİE, GSYİH Haber Bülteni (29.01.2002), http2/www.die.gov.tr/TURKISH/SONIST/GSYIH/gsyih.html
  14. FUJITA, M., KRUGMAN, P.R. ve VENABLES, A.J. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions an International Trade, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  15. GLAESER, EL. (1998), “Are Sties Dying?”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 12, 139-160.
  16. Glaeser, E.L., KOLKO, J. ve SAIZ, A. (2000), “Consumer City”, NBER Working Paper Series, No: 7790, July.
  17. GLAESER, E.L., SHEINKMAN, J.A. ve SHEIFER A. (1995), “Economic Growth in a Cross- Section of Cities”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117-143.
  18. GLENDON, Spencer (1998), “Urban Life Cycles”, Working Paper, Harvard University, Carnbrideg MA.
  19. GOTTLIEB, Paul D. (1995), “Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development”, Urban Studies, 32, 1413-1436.
  20. HENDERSON, J. V. (1982), “Evaluating Consumer Amenities and Interregional Welfare Differences”, Journal of Urban Economics, 11, 32-59.
  21. HERZOG, Henry W. ve SCHLOTTMANN, Alan M. (1993), “Valuing Amenities and Disamenities of Urban Scale: Can Bigger Be Better”, Journal of Regional Science, 33, 145-165.
  22. J ORGENSON, D. W. ve GRILICHES, Z. (1967) “The Explanation of Productivity Change,” Review of Economic Studies, 34, 249-283.
  23. KOHLER, Hans P. (1997), “The Effect of Hedonic Migration Decision and Region-Spesific Amenities on Industrial Location: Could Sillicon Valley be in South Dakota?”, Journal of Regional Science, 3, 379-394.
  24. KRUGMAN, P.R. (1991), “Increasin Returns to Geograph”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 439- 499.
  25. LOPES, E. (1996), On The Determinant of Regional Development, European Regional Science Association, 36 th European Congress, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 26-30 August, 1-10.
  26. LUCAS, RE. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  27. MALECKI, E. (1984), “High Technology and Location Economic Development”, Journal of American Planning Association, 50, 262-269.
  28. MATHUR, V. (1999), “Human Capital-Based Strategy for Regional Economic Development”, Economic Development Quarterly, 13,4 (August), 203-216.
  29. MINCER, Jacob (1970), “The Distribution of Labor Incomes: A Survey. With Special Reference to the Human Capital Approach”, Journal of Economic Literature, VIII (1), March, 1-26.
  30. MUSHKINS S.] . (1962), “Health as an Investment”, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 129-157.
  31. OECD (1998), Human Capital Investment : An International Comparison, Paris.
  32. ROBACK, Jennifer (1982), “Wages, Rents and Quality of Life”, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257-1278.
  33. ROMER, Paul M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp: 71-102.
  34. ROMER, David (2001), Advanced Macroeconomics, 2 nd Edition, New Yorkch Graw-Hill.
  35. SCHULTZ, Theodore W. (1959), “Investment in Man: An Economist’s View,” The Social Service Review, XXXIII, 2, (June), 109-117.
  36. SCHULTZ, Theodore W. (1961), “Investment in Human Capital,” American Economic Review LI, (March) 1-17.
  37. SIMON, C. (1998), “Human Capital and Metropolitan Employment Growth”, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 223-243.
  38. SVITANIDOU, Rena ve SVITAN IDES, Petros (1995), “Intrametropolitan Distrubition R&D Activities: Theory and Emprical Evidence”, Journal of Regional Science, 35, 391-415.
  39. UNDP, (1990), Human Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press, New York.
  40. UNDP, (2001), Human Development Report-Turkey, Ankara.
  41. UNDP, (2004), Human Development Report-Turkey, Information and Communication Technologies, Ankara.
  42. UNDP, (2004), Human Development Report, Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World.