SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

“Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme”

Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme

Murat Çetin
Pages
141–156
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

Çetin, M. (2005). “Türkiye'de Beşeri Kalkınma: Bölgesel Bazlı Bir Değerlendirme”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 141–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/1073201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. BASSANINI, A. ve SCARPETTA, S. (2001), “Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries? Evidence From Pooled Mean-Group Estimates”, Economic Department Working Papers, No: 01/282.
  2. BECKER, Gary S. (1962), “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, LXX, 9-49.
  3. BECKER, Gary S. (1975), Human Capital, 2nd Edition, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  4. BERGLUND, Elisabet (1999), “Human Capital and Regional Entry of Firms”, Umeea Economic Studies 500, 1-22.
  5. BLACK, Dan, GATES, Gary, SANDERS, Seth ve TAYLOR, Lowell (1998), “Why Do Gay Men Live in San Fransisco?”, Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
  6. BLOOM, D.E., CANNING, D. ve SEVILLA, J.(2001), “The Effect of Health on Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence”, NBER Woking Paper Series, No. 8587, (November).
  7. BRUECKNER, Jan K., THISSE, Jacques, ZENOU, Yves (1999), “Why is Central Paris Rich and Downtown Detroit Poor? An Amenity-based Theory”, European Economic Review, 43, 91-107.
  8. CLARC, David E. ve COSGRAVE, James C., (1991), “Amenities Versus Labor Market Opportunities: Choosing the Optimal Distance to Move”, Journal of Regional Science, 31, 31 1-328.
  9. CLARC, David E. ve KAHN, James R. (1988), “The Social BeneŞts of Urban Cultural Amenities”, Journal of Regional Science, 28, 363-377.
  10. CROPPER, Maureen L. (1981), “The Value of Urban Amenities”, Journal of Regional Science, 21, 359-374.
  11. DAGUM, Camilo ve SLOTTJE, Daniel J. (2000), “A New Method to Estimate the Level and Distribution of Household Human Capital with Application”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 67-94.
  12. DENISON, E. F. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experiences in Nine Western Countries, Washington DC: Brookings.
  13. DİE, GSYİH Haber Bülteni (29.01.2002), http2/www.die.gov.tr/TURKISH/SONIST/GSYIH/gsyih.html
  14. FUJITA, M., KRUGMAN, P.R. ve VENABLES, A.J. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions an International Trade, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  15. GLAESER, EL. (1998), “Are Sties Dying?”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 12, 139-160.
  16. Glaeser, E.L., KOLKO, J. ve SAIZ, A. (2000), “Consumer City”, NBER Working Paper Series, No: 7790, July.
  17. GLAESER, E.L., SHEINKMAN, J.A. ve SHEIFER A. (1995), “Economic Growth in a Cross- Section of Cities”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117-143.
  18. GLENDON, Spencer (1998), “Urban Life Cycles”, Working Paper, Harvard University, Carnbrideg MA.
  19. GOTTLIEB, Paul D. (1995), “Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development”, Urban Studies, 32, 1413-1436.
  20. HENDERSON, J. V. (1982), “Evaluating Consumer Amenities and Interregional Welfare Differences”, Journal of Urban Economics, 11, 32-59.
  21. HERZOG, Henry W. ve SCHLOTTMANN, Alan M. (1993), “Valuing Amenities and Disamenities of Urban Scale: Can Bigger Be Better”, Journal of Regional Science, 33, 145-165.
  22. J ORGENSON, D. W. ve GRILICHES, Z. (1967) “The Explanation of Productivity Change,” Review of Economic Studies, 34, 249-283.
  23. KOHLER, Hans P. (1997), “The Effect of Hedonic Migration Decision and Region-Spesific Amenities on Industrial Location: Could Sillicon Valley be in South Dakota?”, Journal of Regional Science, 3, 379-394.
  24. KRUGMAN, P.R. (1991), “Increasin Returns to Geograph”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 439- 499.
  25. LOPES, E. (1996), On The Determinant of Regional Development, European Regional Science Association, 36 th European Congress, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 26-30 August, 1-10.
  26. LUCAS, RE. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  27. MALECKI, E. (1984), “High Technology and Location Economic Development”, Journal of American Planning Association, 50, 262-269.
  28. MATHUR, V. (1999), “Human Capital-Based Strategy for Regional Economic Development”, Economic Development Quarterly, 13,4 (August), 203-216.
  29. MINCER, Jacob (1970), “The Distribution of Labor Incomes: A Survey. With Special Reference to the Human Capital Approach”, Journal of Economic Literature, VIII (1), March, 1-26.
  30. MUSHKINS S.]. (1962), “Health as an Investment”, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 129-157.
  31. OECD (1998), Human Capital Investment: An International Comparison, Paris.
  32. ROBACK, Jennifer (1982), “Wages, Rents and Quality of Life”, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257-1278.
  33. ROMER, Paul M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp: 71-102.
  34. ROMER, David (2001), Advanced Macroeconomics, 2 nd Edition, New Yorkch Graw-Hill.
  35. SCHULTZ, Theodore W. (1959), “Investment in Man: An Economist’s View,” The Social Service Review, XXXIII, 2, (June), 109-117.
  36. SCHULTZ, Theodore W. (1961), “Investment in Human Capital,” American Economic Review LI, (March) 1-17.
  37. SIMON, C. (1998), “Human Capital and Metropolitan Employment Growth”, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 223-243.
  38. SVITANIDOU, Rena ve SVITAN IDES, Petros (1995), “Intrametropolitan Distrubition R&D Activities: Theory and Emprical Evidence”, Journal of Regional Science, 35, 391-415.
  39. UNDP, (1990), Human Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press, New York.
  40. UNDP, (2001), Human Development Report-Turkey, Ankara.
  41. UNDP, (2004), Human Development Report-Turkey, Information and Communication Technologies, Ankara.
  42. UNDP, (2004), Human Development Report, Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World.