KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı

İsmail Cenk Demirkol
Hamza Tosun
Yusuf Yüksel
Sayfa
139–151
Yayın Tarihi
2015-06-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ancak, sonuçlar sürücülerin kaza geçirme ile ilgili algılarının emniyet kemeri kullanmalarına bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı değişik koşullarda emniyet kemeri kullanımına etki eden faktörleri incelemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sürücülerin emniyet kemeri kullanımı ile ilgili belirtmiş oldukları tutumlar ile çeşitli davranış ve tutumları incelenerek her ne kadar jandarma ve polis emniyet kemeri kontrolü yapsa da bazı sürücülerin neden emniyet kemeri kullanmadıkları anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ancak, sonuçlar sürücülerin kaza geçirme ile ilgili algılarının emniyet kemeri kullanmalarına bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı · Heyecan Arayışı · Saldırganlık

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı değişik koşullarda emniyet kemeri kullanımına etki eden faktörleri incelemektir. Sürücülerin emniyet kemeri kullanımı ile ilgili belirtmiş oldukları tutumlar ile çeşitli davranış ve tutumları incelenerek her ne kadar jandarma ve polis emniyet kemeri kontrolü yapsa da bazı sürücülerin neden emniyet kemeri kullanmadıkları anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Sonuçlar, emniyet kemeri ve trafik güvenliğiyle ilgili programları takip eden ve trafikte daha az heyecan arayan kişilerin daha büyük olasılıkla emniyet kemeri kullandıklarını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, katılımcıların saldırgan tutumları ve polis ve kameraların varlığı da katılımcıların bazı şartlarda emniyet kemeri kullanmalarına yol açtığını göstermiştir. Ancak, sonuçlar sürücülerin kaza geçirme ile ilgili algılarının emniyet kemeri kullanmalarına bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Demirkol, İ. C., Tosun, H., Yüksel, Y. (2015). Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.86580

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (76)

  1. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  2. Akbas, O., Guven, R., Cebeci, G., Bertlek, S. B., Alde- mir, G., & Bal, E. (2010). A study on the effects of seat belt posters on drivers. Procedia-Social and Be- havioral Sciences, 2(2), 1002-1007.
  3. Arnett, J. J. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new concep- tualization and a new scale. Personality and Indivi- dual Differences, 16 (2), 289-296.
  4. Arnett, J. J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 20 (6), 693-702.
  5. Arnett, J. J., Offer, D., & Fine, M. A. (1997). Reckless driving in adolescence: ‘State’ and ‘trait’ factors. Ac- cident Analysis & Prevention, 29 (1), 57-63.
  6. Beck, L. F., & Shults, R. A. (2009). Seat belt use in states and territories with primary and secondary laws- -United States, 2006. Journal of safety research,40 (6), 469-472.
  7. Bilgic, S., Barut, H. B., Karacasu, M., Er, A., & Yaliniz, P. (2011). The changes in usage of seat belts in An- talya, Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Scien- ces, 20, 588-593.
  8. Block, A. W. (2002). 2000 motor vehicle occupant safety survey: Seat belt report. US Department of Trans- portation, National Highway Traffic Safety Admi- nistration.
  9. Budd, R. J., North, D., & Spencer, C. (1984). Understan- ding seat‐belt use: A test of Bentler and Speckart’s extension of the ‘theory of reasoned action’. Europe- an Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 69-78.
  10. Campbell, B. J. (1989). The association between en- forcement and seat belt use. Journal of safety Rese- arch, 19(4), 159-163.
  11. Chaudhary, N. K., Solomon, M. G., & Cosgrove, L. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived risk of being ticketed and self-reported seat belt use. Jour- nal of Safety Research, 35(4), 383-390.
  12. Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2003). The effects of manda- tory seat belt laws on driving behavior and traffic fatalities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 828-843.
  13. Cummings, P., Wells, J. D., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Esti- mating seat belt effectiveness using matched-pair cohort methods. Accident Analysis & Preventi- on, 35(1), 143-149.
  14. Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Filetti, L. B., Dahlen, E. R., & Oetting, E. R. (2003). Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers. Behaviour Research and The- rapy, 41(3), 333-349.
  15. Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Ying- ling, D. A. (2001). Driving anger: Correlates and a test of state-trait theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1321-1331.
  16. Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., & Lynch, R. S. (1994). Development of a driving anger scale. Psychologi- cal reports, 74(1), 83-91.
  17. Demirer, A., Durat, M., & Hasimoglu, C. (2012). In- vestigation of seat belt use among the drivers of different education levels. Safety science, 50(4), 1005-1008.
  18. Dinh-Zarr, T. B., Sleet, D. A., Shults, R. A., Zaza, S., El- der, R. W., Nichols, J. L., Thompson, R. S., & Sosin, D. M. (2001). Reviews of evidence regarding inter- ventions to increase the use of safety belts. Ameri- can Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(4), 48-65.
  19. European Transport Safety Council (2010). 4th an- nual road safety performance index (PIN) report. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://etsc.eu/4th- annual-road-safety-performance-index-pin- report/
  20. Evans, L. (1986). The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities. Accident Analysis & Preventi- on, 18(3), 229-241.
  21. Evans, L. (1988). Rear seat restraint system effective- ness in preventing fatalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20(2), 129-136.
  22. Evans, L. (1990). Restraint effectiveness, occupant ejection from cars, and fatality reductions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 22(2), 167-175.
  23. Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  24. Evans, L. (1996). Safety-belt effectiveness: The influen- ce of crash severity and selective recruitment. Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 28(4), 423-433.
  25. Evans, L., & Frick, M. C. (1986). Safety belt effective- ness in preventing driver fatalities versus a number of vehicular, accident, roadway, and environmental factors. Journal of Safety Research, 17(4), 143-154.
  26. Fernandes, R., Hatfield, J., & Soames Job, R. F. (2010). A systematic investigation of the differential pre- dictors for speeding, drink-driving, driving while fatigued, and not wearing a seat belt, among yo- ung drivers. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(3), 179-196.
  27. Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring me- dia exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 1189- 1208.
  28. Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1999). Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggressi- on. Aggressive Behavior, 25(6), 409-423.
  29. Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky dri- ving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135-150.
  30. Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2002). Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwe- gian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33 (8), 1251-1263.
  31. Jonah, B. A. (1986). Accident risk and risk-taking be- haviour among young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(4), 255-271.
  32. Jonah, B. A. (1990). Age differences in risky dri- ving. Health Education Research, 5(2), 139-149.
  33. Jonah, B. A. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky dri- ving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 29(5), 651-665.
  34. Jonah, B. A., Thiessen, R., & Au-Yeung, E. (2001). Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(5), 679-684.
  35. Lajunen, T., & Ozkan, T. (2011). Self-report instru- ments and methods. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbo- ok of Traffic Psychology (pp.43-59). San Diego, CA: Elseveir.
  36. Lajunen, T., & Parker, D. (2001). Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship bet- ween self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33 (2), 243-255.
  37. Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving experien- ce, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimen- sions in drivers’ self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 307-318.
  38. Lajunen, T., Parker, D., & Stradling, S. G. (1998). Di- mensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orien- tation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 107-121.
  39. Lund, A. K., Stuster, J., & Fleming, A. (1989). Special publicity and enforcement of California’s belt use law: making a “secondary” law work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17(5), 329-341.
  40. Ozkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship bet- ween sex and gender‐role on aggressive driving, traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive Behavior, 31(6), 547-558.
  41. Ozkan, T., Puvanachandra, P., Lajunen, T., Hoe, C., & Hyder, A. (2012). The validity of self-reported se- atbelt use in a country where levels of use are low. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 47, 75-77.
  42. Pligt, J. (1996). Risk perception and self-protective be- havior. European Psychologist, 1(1), 34-43.
  43. Pligt, J. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as pre- dictors of precautionary behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3(1), 1-14.
  44. Porter, B. E., Lajunen, T., Ozkan, T., & Will, K. E. (2010). A behavioral observation study of Turkish drivers’ and children’s safety belt use. Procedia-So- cial and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1607-1609.
  45. Rundmo, T., & Iversen, H. (2004). Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science, 42(1), 1-21.
  46. Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2008a). Environmen- tal and psychosocial factors affecting seat belt use among Turkish front-seat occupants in Ankara: Two observation studies. Traffic injury preventi- on, 9(3), 264-267.
  47. Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2008b). Why Turks do not use seat belts? An interview study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 470-478.
  48. Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2009). Relationship of seat belt use to health and driver behaviors. Trans- portation research part F: traffic psychology and be- haviour, 12(3), 235-241.
  49. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Ac- cident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psycho- logical perspective. Accident Analysis & Preventi- on,10(4), 281-285.
  50. Stasson, M., & Fishbein, M. (1990). The relation bet- ween perceived risk and preventive action: A wit- hin‐subject analysis of perceived driving risk and intentions to wear seatbelts. Journal of Applied So- cial Psychology, 20(19), 1541-1557.
  51. Stead, M., Tagg, S., MacKintosh, A. M., & Eadie, D. (2005). Development and evaluation of a mass me- dia Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Education Research, 20(1), 36-50.
  52. Svenson, O., Fischhoff, B., & MacGregor, D. (1985). Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage. Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 17(2), 119-133.
  53. Turkish National Police (2014). Emniyet kemeri neden gereklidir. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http:// www.trafik.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EmniyetKemeriKulla- nimi.aspx
  54. Ulleberg, P. (2002). Personality subtypes of young dri- vers: Relationship to risk-taking preferences, acci- dent involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,4(4), 279-297.
  55. Williams, A. F., & Wells, J. K. (2004). The role of enfor- cement programs in increasing seat belt use. Jour- nal of Safety Research, 35(2), 175-180.
  56. Williams, A. F., Lund, A. K., Preusser, D. F., & Blom- berg, R. D. (1987). Results of a seat belt use law enforcement and publicity campaign in Elmira, New York. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 19(4), 243-249.
  57. Williams, A. F., Reinfurt, D., & Wells, J. K. (1996). Inc- reasing seat belt use in North Carolina. Journal of Safety Research, 27(1), 33-41.
  58. Williams, A. F., Wells, J. K., McCartt, A. T., & Preus- ser, D. F. (2001). “Buckle up now ” An enforcement program to achieve high belt use. Journal of Safety Research, 31(4), 195-201.
  59. Xie, C., & Parker, D. (2002). A social psychological approach to driving violations in two Chinese ci- ties. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psycho- logy and Behaviour, 5 (4), 293-308.
  60. Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky be- havior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Appendix Variables Sensation Seeking
  61. I do avoid the competition in traffic (R)
  62. I keep sufficient following distance (R)
  63. I do avoid unnecessary risks (R)
  64. I conform to the speed limits (R) Cronbach’s Alpha Aggressiveness
  65. I horn to indicate my annoyance
  66. When I get angry at a driver, I give a chase Cronbach’s Alpha Risk Perceptions
  67. It is very likely that I involve traffic accident in the future Media
  68. As a driver I always interested in traffic related media campaigns
  69. As a driver I try to follow seminars on drivers
  70. As a driver I watch tv programs on safe driving
  71. Cronbach’s Alpha Enforcement
  72. I obey traffic rules if I see a police car watching traffic from a hidden position
  73. I obey traffic rules when I see a radar speed trap
  74. I obey traffic rules when a police car is driving in traffic close to me
  75. I obey the traffic rules when I notice cameras Cronbach’s Alpha
  76. R= Reverse; A/SA= Agree/Strongly Agree A-SA / % M / SD Factor Loading 61 / 18 34 / 10 35 / 10 55 / 16 1.65 / .83 .70 .75 39 / 11 24 / 7 1.31 / .76 .83 .54 146 / 42 2.38 / .91 215 / 62 147 / 42 212 / 61 2.87 / .90 .75 .73 265 / 76 3.10 / 1.08 .88 259 / 74 3.07 / 1.07 .86 301 / 86 3.43 / .93 .89 301 / 86 3.42 / .94 .86 .89