KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4

Dijital Çağda Psikolojik Sermayeyi Geliştirmek: Sanal Kaytarma Olgusuna Yeni Bir Bakış

Enhancing Psychological Capital in the Digital Age: A Fresh Look to Cyberloafing Phenomenon

Ece Kaçmaz
Eylem Şimşek
Sayfa
1273–1294
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Psikolojik sermaye ile sanal kaytarma alt boyutları olan sonuç, ceza ve sonuçlara ilişkin inançlar arasında negatif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, sanal kaytarma ile psikolojik sermaye arasındaki etkileşim demografik özellikler dikkate alınarak incelenmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Toplam 196 katılımcının verisi analiz edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Psikolojik sermaye ile sanal kaytarma alt boyutları olan sonuç, ceza ve sonuçlara ilişkin inançlar arasında negatif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:196 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Sanal Kaytarma · Psikolojik Sermaye · Sanal Aylaklık

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sanal kaytarma ile psikolojik sermaye arasındaki etkileşim demografik özellikler dikkate alınarak incelenmiştir. Nicel paradigma kapsamında tarama, ilişkisel ve nedensel karşılaştırma modelleri kullanılmıştır. Toplam 196 katılımcının verisi analiz edilmiştir. Bir seri korelasyon, varyans ve regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre demografik verilere bağlı olarak sanal kaytarma ve psikolojik sermaye ortalamaları anlamlı ölçüde farklılaşmaktadır. Erkeklerin ve yaş grubu düşük olanların sanal kaytarma puanları anlamlı ölçüde yüksektir. Kadınlar, çalışma yılı düşük ve yaşı küçük olanlar ve psikoloji alanında çalışanlar daha düşük psikolojik sermayeye sahiptir. Psikolojik sermaye ile sanal kaytarma alt boyutları olan sonuç, ceza ve sonuçlara ilişkin inançlar arasında negatif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Sanal kaytarma alt boyutlarından davranış, tutum ive kolaylaştırıcı boyutları psikolojik sermaye ile pozitif yönde ilişkilidir. Regresyon analizlerinde sanal kaytarma alt faktörlerinin (sonuçlar ve ceza, sonuçlara ilişkin inançlar ve kolaylaştırma) psikolojik sermaye varyansının %16,3'ünü açıkladığı, iş deneyiminin ise %4,3'lük bir katkı sağladığı belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçları işle ilgili olmayan internet kullanımına ilişkin hoşgörülü politikaların sanal kaytarma yoluyla çalışanların psikolojik sermayeyi artırdığını, buna karşın katı tedbirlerin ve cezanın psikolojik sermayeyi azalttığını göstermiştir.

Abstract

In this study, the interaction between cyberloafing and psychological capital was examined by considering demographic characteristics. Scanning, relational and causal comparison models are used within the scope of the quantitative paradigm. The data of a total of 196 participants were analyzed. A series of correlation, variance and regression analysis was performed. According to the results of the analysis, cyberloafing and psychological capital averages differ significantly depending on demographic data. Cyberloafing scores of males and those with a lower age group are significantly higher. Women, those with low working years and younger age, and psychology proffesionals have lower psychological capital. Psychological capital is negatively related to the outcome and punishment sub-dimension and beliefs about the outcome, while the behavior, attitude and facilitator dimension is positively related. Regression analysis indicated that cyberloafing subfactors (consequences and punishment, beliefs about outcomes, and facilitating) accounted for 16.3% of PsyCap variance, while work experience contributed an extra 4.3%. Consequence and punishment, and beliefs about outcome are associated with decreased PS, facilitator dimension, and working year associated with increased PS. The study suggests that lenient policies on non-work-related internet use enhance employees' PsyCap through cyberloafing, whereas strict cautionary measures decrease it.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaçmaz, E., Şimşek, E. (2023). Dijital Çağda Psikolojik Sermayeyi Geliştirmek: Sanal Kaytarma Olgusuna Yeni Bir Bakış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4, 1273–1294. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1324704

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (62)

  1. Agarwal, U. A. (2019). Impact of supervisors’ perceived communication style on subordinate’s psychological capital and cyberloafing. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1759
  2. Agarwal, U. A. and Avey, J. B. (2020). Abusive supervisors and employees who cyberloaf: Examining the roles of psychological capital and contract breach. Internet Research, 30(3), 789-809. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2019-0208
  3. Akdoğan, A. and Polatcı, S. (2013). The role of work family spillover and psychologıcal well-beıng on the effect of psychological capital on performance. Ataturk University Of Journal Social Sciences Institute, 17(1), 273-293. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2832/38495
  4. Anandarajan, A., Francis, B., Hasan, I. and John, K. (2011). Value relevance of banks: Global evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 36, 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0170-7
  5. Anandarajan, M., Devine, P. and Simmers, C. A. (2004). A multidimensional sealing approach to personal web usage in the workplace. In Personal web usage in the workplace: A guide to effective human resources management (pp. 61-79). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  6. Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C. and Igbaria, M. (2000). An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of internet usage: An individual perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(1), 69-85. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/73728780/An_exploratory_investigation_of_the_ antecedents_and_impact_of_Internet_usage_An_individual_perspective
  7. Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A. and Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.006
  8. Barlow, J., Bean, L. and Hott, D. D. (2003). Employee “spy” software: Should you use it? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 14(4), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.10162
  9. Baturay, M. H. and Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081
  10. Blanchard, A. L. and Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.c hb.2007.03.008
  11. Çetin, F. and Basım, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137. Retrieved form https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/131551/
  12. Demirtepe-Saygılı, D. and Metin-Orta, I. (2021). An investigation of cyberloafing in relation to coping styles and psychological symptoms in an educational setting. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1559-1587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120950299
  13. Ding, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, T., Qiu, X., He, X., Wang, W., Wang, L. and Sui, H. (2015). The mediating role of coping style in the relationship between psychological capital and burnout among Chinese nurses. PloS one, 10(4), e0122128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122128
  14. Durak, H. Y. (2020). Cyberloafing in learning environments where online social networking sites are used as learning tools: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 539-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867766
  15. Elciyar, K. (2009). İşyerlerindeki sanal kaytarmanın kurumsal ve bireysel değişkenler açısından kişilerarası davranış kuramı bağlamında incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  16. Gardner, D. G. and Pierce, J. L. (1998). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: An empirical examination. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601198231004
  17. Garrett, R. K. and Danziger, J. N. (2008). On cyberslacking: Workplace status and personal internet use at work. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 287-292. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0146
  18. Henle, C. A., Kohut, G. and Booth, R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 902-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005
  19. Hui, Q., Cao, X., Lou, L. and He, H. (2014). E Empirical research on the influence of organizational support on psychological capital. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4, 182-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.44025
  20. Jia, H., Jia, R. and Karau, S. (2013). Cyberloafing and personality: The impact of the Big Five traits and workplace situational factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(3), 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051813488208
  21. Jiang, H. (2020). Understanding the mental recovery effect of cyberloafing: attention replenishment and task-set ınertia. In F. D. Davis, R. Riedl, J. vom Brocke, P.-M. Léger, A. B. Randolph, & T. (Eds.), Information systems and neuroscience (pp. 204-210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_24
  22. Keklik, B., Kılıç, R., Yıldız, H. and Yıldız, B. (2015). An investigation of the effect of cyberloafing behaviors on organizational learning capacity. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(3), 129-144. Retrieved from https://www.berjournal.com/tr/an-investigation-of-the-effect-of-cyberloafing-behaviors-on-organizational-learning-capacity
  23. Liberman, B., Seidman, G., McKenna, K. Y. and Buffardi, L. E. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2192-2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.015
  24. Lim, V. K. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of organizational behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(5), 675-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  25. Lim, V. K. and Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290903353054
  26. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(6), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
  27. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M. and Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(3), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373
  28. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Clapp-Smith, R. and Li, W. (2008). More evidence on the value of Chinese workers’ psychological capital: A potentially unlimited competitive resource? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(5), 818-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801991194
  29. Luthans, F. and Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003
  30. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. and Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Investing and developing positive organizational behavior. Positive Organizational Behavior, 1(2), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801991194
  31. Luthans, F. and Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
  32. Mastrangelo, P. M., Everton, W. and Jolton, J. A. (2006). Personal use of work computers: Distraction versus destruction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 730-741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01897
  33. McCormack, H. M., MacIntyre, T. E., O’Shea, D., Herring, M. P. and Campbell, M. J. (2018). The prevalence and cause (s) of burnout among applied psychologists: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01897
  34. Mills, J. E., Hu, B., Beldona, S. and Clay, J. (2001). Cyberslacking! A wired-workplace liability issue. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010880401425004
  35. Moody, G. D. and Siponen, M. (2013). Using the theory of interpersonal behavior to explain non-work-related personal use of the Internet at work. Information & Management, 50(6), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.04.005
  36. Morris, M. G. and Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 375-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x
  37. Page, D. (2015). Teachers’ personal web use at work. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(5), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.928744
  38. Parthi, K. and Gupta, R. (2016). A study of psychological capital, job satisfaction and organizational climate in telecom sector: A gender perspective. Diviner, 13(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305724111_A_Study_of_Psychological_Capital_Job_Satisfaction_and_ Organizational_Climate_in_Telecom_Sector_A_Gender_Perspective
  39. Perone, M. (2003). Negative effects of positive reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392064
  40. Prasad, M. P. and Sandhyavani, D. K. (2019). The impact of demography on psychological capital: an empirical study in the retail sector (2019). International Journal of Management, 10(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.10.1.2019/008
  41. Prasad, S., Lim, V. K. and Chen, D. J. (2010). Self-regulation, individual characteristics and cyberloafing. PACIS 2010 Proceedings. 159, 1641-1648. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Self-Regulation%2C-Individual-Characteristics-and-Prasad-Lim/f3d50167c87f88bd18080362d876b68bad3 ae1b1
  42. Proctor, C., Linley, P. and Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction measures: A review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 128-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650816
  43. Rajah, R. and Lim, V. K. (2011). Cyberloafing, neutralization, and organizational citizenship behavior. PACIS 2011 Proceedings. 152. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2011/152/
  44. Sao, R., Chandak, S., Patel, B. and Bhadade, P. (2020). Cyberloafing: Effects on employee job performance and behaviour. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), 1509-1515. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.e4832.018520
  45. Saygın, M. and Güvenç, K. (2019). Cyberloafıng tendencies of the workers: The case of Silifke organızed industrıal zone. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences/Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(37), 820-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2597
  46. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N. and Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
  47. Seymour, L. and Nadasen, K. (2007). Web access for IT staff: A developing world perspective on web abuse. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710829532
  48. Skeja, A. and Lorcu, F. (2022). Relation of three phenomena: Cyberloafing, creativity, and stress. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(39), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.12.029
  49. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., Taylor, J. D., Schroeder, L. L. and Adams III, V. H. (2000). The roles of hopeful thinking in preventing problems and enhancing strengths. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 9(4), 249-269.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(00)80003-7
  50. Sofyanty, D. (2019). Perilaku cyberloafing ditinjau dari psychological capital dan adversity quotient. Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, 3(2), 186-194. https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v3i1
  51. Süral Özer, P., Topaloğlu, T. ve Timurcanday Özmen, Ö. N. (2013). Destekleyici örgüt ikliminin, psikolojik sermaye ile iş doyumu ilişkisinde düzenleyici etkisi. Ege Academic Review, 13(4), 1437-447. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/559954
  52. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidel, S. F. (1999). Using multivarate statistics (4th editon). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
  53. Tahir, K. (2021). Impact of cognitive absorption on academic procrastination by considering the mediating role of cyberloafing and moderating role of psychological capital. (Unpublished master thesis). Islamabad: Capital University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://thesis.cust.edu.pk/UploadedFiles/Kanza%20Tahir-MMS183017.pdf
  54. Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Loughren, E. A., Kinnafick, F. E., Taylor, I. M., Duda, J. L. and Fox, K. R. (2015). Changes in work affect in response to lunchtime walking in previously physically inactive employees: A randomized trial. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(6), 778-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12398
  55. Ugrin, J. C., Pearson, J. M. and Odom, M. D. (2008). Profiling cyber-slackers in the workplace: Demographic, cultural, and workplace factors. Journal of Internet Commerce, 6(3), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1300/J179v06n03_04
  56. Uysal, H. T. (2019). A Research towards the reality of psychological capital in modern workforce. İnsan ve İnsan, 6(19), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.444436
  57. Ünal, Ö. F. ve Tekdemir, S. (2015). Sanal kaytarma: Bir kamu kurumunda ampirik bir araştirma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 95-118. Retrieved form https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/20811/222587
  58. Van Morkhoven, N. D. (1997). The prevalence of burnout among psychologists and psychological associates in the state of Texas. Unpublished master thesis. Texas, USA: University of Texas. Retrieved from Texas Medical Center Dissertations (via ProQuest). AAI9814774. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.library. tmc.edu/dissertations/AAI9814774
  59. Wu, J., Mei, W., Liu, L. and Ugrin, J. C. (2020). The bright and dark sides of social cyberloafing: Effects on employee mental health in China. Journal of Business Research, 112, 56-64. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.043
  60. Wu, W.Y. and Nguyen, K.V.H. (2019). The antecedents and consequences of psychological capital: A meta-analytic approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.043.
  61. Yıldız, H., Yıldız, B. ve Hamza, A. (2015). Sanal kaytarma davranışlarının sergirilmesinde örgütsel adalet algısının rolü var mıdır? Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 10(2), 55-66. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/beyder/issue/30329/327351
  62. Zhang, Y. (2005). Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.006