| The Urban and Architectural Characteristics of Voyvoda Street fromPast toPresent | Elif Süyük Makaklı, Serengül Seçmen | 1–24 |
| Evaluation of Ecological Design Principles in Traditional Houses in Mersin | Emel Birer, Ebubekir Gündoğdu | 25–52 |
| Housing Conditions and Problems of SeasonalAgricultural Workers in Eskişehir Sarıcakaya Settlement, and Suggestions | Fatma Kolsal, Emine Dilay Güney | 53–90 |
| A Study on Determination of Turkish Adjective Pairs for Speech Sound | Zerhan Yüksel Can, Ezgi Türk Gürkan | 91–109 |
| Use of Augmented Reality in the Preservation of Architectural Heritage: Case of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru (Kayseri, Turkey) | Levent Çoruh, Hale Kozlu, Adeoti Oke | 110–130 |
| Hemp as a Potential Material in Architecture: Is it Possible in Turkey? | Esen Gökçe Özdamar | 131–154 |
| The Effectof Environmental Factors on Children from The Viewpoint of Parents | Banu Bekci | 155–172 |
| Comparative Analysis of Axial Map Drawing Methods: Elazığ Application | Emrah Şıkoğlu | 173–191 |
| The Re-Evaluation of Existing School Buildings in Turkey within the Context of ‘Green School’ | Gökçe Tuna Taygun, Sağra Çakır | 192–219 |
| One More Coincide Between Architects and Laypersons on The Aesthetics of Zaha Hadid’s Buildings | Berivan Özbudak Akça, Ebru Erdoğan | 220–241 |
| An Awareness Experience by Empathic Design Method inArchitectural Design Education | Özlem Şenyiğit, Nur Yılmaz | 242–260 |
| Interpreting the Factors in Forming the Sense of Place: The Case of Kuzguncuk Neighbourhood, Istanbul | Hasan Taştan, Neslinur Hızlı Erkılıç, Elifnaz Durusoy Özmen | 261–285 |
| A Structural Evaluation of Urban Design Guidelines in TurkeyandThePerformance-BasedApproachfor Sustainability | Özge Yalçıner Ercoşkun, Simge Özdal Oktay | 286–316 |