KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal Of Renewable Energy Research / 2013 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Enzymatic Saccharaification of Bagasse: Effects of Different Pre-Treatment Methods

Md. Zahangir Alam
Md. Moniruzzaman
SMA Sujan
Mosharof Hossain
Mohammad Shah Jamal
Sayfa
230–234
Yayın Tarihi
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A maximum yield of glucose (60%) and xylose (71%) was obtained in case of (HCW+H3PO4) system at temperature180°C and 160°C and residence time of 30 min and 15 min, respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:About 800,000 tons of bagasse is obtained per year as a by-product from sugar industries in Bangladesh.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study pretreatment of bagasse was done using hot compressed water (HCW), (HCW+H3PO4) and (HCW+NH3).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A maximum yield of glucose (60%) and xylose (71%) was obtained in case of (HCW+H3PO4) system at temperature180°C and 160°C and residence time of 30 min and 15 min, respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Saccharification · Bagasse · Biofuel

Abstract

About 800,000 tons of bagasse is obtained per year as a by-product from sugar industries in Bangladesh. Bagasse is one of the most readily available lignocellulosic biomass that is a potential source for ethanol production through enzymatic saccharification and hydrolysis. Pretreatment enhances saccharification by removing lignin and hemicellulose. In this study pretreatment of bagasse was done using hot compressed water (HCW), (HCW+H3PO4) and (HCW+NH3). Effects of different pretreatment parameters such as temperature, residence time, concentration of NH3 and H3PO4 were studied in detail. (HCW+H3PO4) system was found to be more effective compared to other systems investigated in this study. A maximum yield of glucose (60%) and xylose (71%) was obtained in case of (HCW+H3PO4) system at temperature180°C and 160°C and residence time of 30 min and 15 min, respectively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Alam, M. Z., Moniruzzaman, M., Sujan, S., Hossain, M., Jamal, M. S. (2013). Enzymatic Saccharaification of Bagasse: Effects of Different Pre-Treatment Methods. International Journal Of Renewable Energy Research, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 230–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/996511

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. C. E. Wyman, “Bio-mass Ethanol: Technical Progress, Opportunities, and Commercial Challenges”, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. Vol. 24, pp. 189-226, November 1999.
  2. S. C. Yat, A. Berger and D. R. Shonnard, “Kinetic Characterization for dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of timber varieties and switchgrass”, Bioresour Technol. Vol. 99, pp. 3855-3863, June 2008. B. C. Saha, “Hemicellulose bioconversion”, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Vol. 30, pp. 279-291, May 2003. Y. Sun and J. Cheng, “Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A Review”, Bioresource. Technol., vol. 83, pp. 1-11, May 2002.
  3. S. Pareek, J. Azuma, Y. Shimizu and S. Matsui, “Hydrolysis of newspaper polysaccharides under sulfate reducing Biodegradation, vol. 11, pp. 229-237, 2000. producing conditions”, C. M. Roche, C. J. Dibble and J. J. Stickel, “Laboratory- scale lignocellulosic Biotechnol. Biofuels, vol. 2, pp. 28 (1-11), November at biomass of high-solids loadings”, G. Brodeur, E. Yau, K. Badal, J. Collier, K. B. Ramachandran and S. Ramakrishnan, “Chemical and Physicochemical Biomass: A Review” Enzyme Research, doi: 4061/2011/787532, January 2011.
  4. Lignocellulosic S. Beszedes, M. Abel, G. Szabo, Z. Laszlo, G. Szabo and C. Hodur, “Application of response surface methodology to optimize microwave sludge conditioning for enhanced biogas production”, Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara, International Journal of Engineering, vol. IX, pp. 189-193, 2011.
  5. M. Irfan, M. Gulsher, S. Abbas, Q. Syed, M. Nadeem and S. Baig, “Effect of various pretreatment conditions on enzymatic saccharification”, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 33, 397-404, Jul.-Aug. 2011.
  6. D. L. Yin, Y. Jing, W. W. AlDajani, S. D. Ulrike Tschirner, J. Schilling and R. J. Kazlauskas, “Improved pretreatment enzymatically-generated BioresourTechnol., Vol. 102, 5183-5192, 2011. using acid”, peracetic A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, D. Templeton and D. Crocker, Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden Co., July 2006.
  7. A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter and D. Templeton, Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples. Laboratory Analytical Procedure, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden Co., Aug. 2006.
  8. D. J. Fox, P. P. Gray, N. W. Dunn and W. L. Marsden, An Explanation of Discrepancy between the Results of HPLC and DNS Assays in t