Dergiler / International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE IN INDONESIAN BANKING: A CROSS-SECTIONAL AND DYNAMIC PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Sayfa
41–55
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This also results in the negative relationship between capital adequacy ratio and bank performance

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper examines determinants of bank performance in Indonesia for the period of 1994-1999.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This research incorporates the traditional Structure-Conduct- Performance (SCP) and Relative Efficiency (RE) hypotheses.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This also results in the negative relationship between capital adequacy ratio and bank performance
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Structure-Conduct-Performance Theory · Morald Hazard · Bank Performance

Abstract

This paper examines determinants of bank performance in Indonesia for the period of 1994-1999. It was pooled cross-sectional time series and dynamic panel data models. This research incorporates the traditional Structure-Conduct- Performance (SCP) and Relative Efficiency (RE) hypotheses. The estimation results show that bank performance industry is competitive, and implies that market structure in Indonesian banking sector is nearly perfect competition. However, no evidence has been found in this study in support of the traditional SCP, while RE is otherwise. The negative relationship between loans to business groups and bank performance, which is likely due to the high loans provided to them, thus supporting the moral hazard hypothesis. The negative relationship between market share loan and return on assets, the negative relationship between debt-to-total assets and bank performance is likely because of the high level of debt. The negative relationship between debt-to-total assets and bank performance in a scenario of high interest rates indicates that banks acted responsibly by paying high interest charges prevailing at that time. This also results in the negative relationship between capital adequacy ratio and bank performance

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARİTA, B., ZANDİ, G., SHAHABİ, A. (2012). DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE IN INDONESIAN BANKING: A CROSS-SECTIONAL AND DYNAMIC PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 41–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/993785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J.E. (1988). The basic analytic of moral hazard. NBER Working Paper Series, 24 (82), 1 – 55 Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissimis, S.N., & Delis, M. D. (2005). Bank-specific, industry- specific and macroecomonic determinant of bank profitability. Working Paper, Bank of Greece 25, 1-37.
  2. Bain, J.S. (1951). Relation of profit to industry concentration: American manufacturing, – 1940. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65 (3), 293 - 324. Bank Indonesia. (1988). Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Paket Kebijaksaan Keuangan, Moneter and Perbankan 27 October Basir, A.H.M. (2000). Determinants of profitability and rate of return margins in Islamic bank: some evidence from the middle est.-mail: [email protected], Prepared for the ERF’s Seventh Annual Conference, October. Amman Jordan. Berger, A.N., Hunter, W.C., & Timme, S.G. (1993). The efficiency of financial institutions: A Review & Preview old Research Past Present and Feature. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 221-249.
  3. Chirwa, E.W.T.(2001). Market Structure, liberalization and performance in the Malawian banking industry. AERC Research Paper, 108, 1-55.
  4. Church, J. & Ware, R. (2000). Industrial Organization: A strategic approach, Publisher McGraw-Hill, Singapore Chowdhury, P.R. (2005). Group-lending: sequential financing, lender monitoring and joint liability. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 415 – 439. Daruri, A.D., Edward, D. (2004). BPPN Garbage In Garbage Out. Center for banking crisis (CBC). Jakarta- Indonesia Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Low and Economics, 16, 1 - 9. Dendawijaya, L. (2001).
  5. Manajemen perbankan. Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia. Fu, X., & Hefferman, S. (2005). China: The effects of bank reform on structure and performance. Working Paper Cass Business School, City University, London Gilbert, R.A. (1984). Studies of bank market structure and condition: A review and evaluation. Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, 16, 617-644.
  6. Goddord, J., Molyneux, P.,&Wilson, J.O.S.(2004). The profitability of European banks: A cross-sectional and dynamic panel analysis, The Manchester School, 72, (3), 363-381. Goldberg & Rai.(1996). The structure-performance relationship for European banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 745-771.
  7. Guru, B. K., Staunton, J., & Shanmugam, B. (2000) Determinants of commercial bank profitability in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 5, (2), 1 - 22 Hausman, D.M., & McPherson, M.