In this paper, canonical correlation analysis has been employed to examine the relationship between the indicators of good governance, namely the sets of “policy coherence/effectiveness” and “openness/participation” in EU-15 countries.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness and the coherence are the indicators of good governance and the changes proposed in the White Paper, adopted by the European Commission in July 2001.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The fundamental object of the White Paper is to establish more democratic forms of governance at the different levels.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this paper, canonical correlation analysis has been employed to examine the relationship between the indicators of good governance, namely the sets of “policy coherence/effectiveness” and “openness/participation” in EU-15 countries.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2001 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:E-Government · Good Governance · Policy Coherence
Abstract
Openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness and the coherence are the indicators of good governance and the changes proposed in the White Paper, adopted by the European Commission in July 2001. The fundamental object of the White Paper is to establish more democratic forms of governance at the different levels. In this paper, canonical correlation analysis has been employed to examine the relationship between the indicators of good governance, namely the sets of “policy coherence/effectiveness” and “openness/participation” in EU-15 countries.
UNLUKAPLAN, I. (2010). POLICY COHERENCE, EFFECTIVENESS, OPENNESS AND PARTICIPATION IN EUROPEAN UNION. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/993594
Bouckaert, Geert, Steven van de Walle (2003), “Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol.69, No.3, pp.323-343. Commision of the European Communities (2001), “European Governance: A White Paper”, Brussels: Commision of the European Communities. Demmers, Jolle, Alex E.Fernández Jilberto, Barbara Hogenboom (2004), “Good Governance and Democracy in a World of Neoliberal Regimes”, (in Demmers, Jolle, Alex E.Fernández Jilberto, Barbara Hogenboom- Eds., Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism Conflict and Depolitisation in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa), London: Routledge, pp. 1-32.
Eberlein, Burkard, Dieter Kerwer (2004), “New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective”, JCMS, Vol.42, No. 1, pp.121-142.
Hair, Joseph.F, Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, William. C. Black (1998),
Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int. Inc. Hooghe, L., G. Marks (2001), Multi – Level Governance and European Integration, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001), “The Governance Approach to European Integration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.39, No. 2, pp.245-264.
Kachigian, Sam Kash. (1991), Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Introduction, New York: Radius Press.
Manly, Brian, F. J. (2005), Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, London: Chapman&Hall/CRC. Marks, G. (1993), “Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC”, (In: Cafruny, A. and G. Rosenthal-Eds., The State of the European Community II), Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
Rencher, A. C. (2001),
Methods of Multivariate Analysis, New York: Wiley-Interscience. Rotberg, R. (2004), “Strengthening Governance Ranking Countries Would Help”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.28, No.1, pp.71-81.