KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Business and Management Studies / 2009 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

“WE ARE A FAMILY” – A CRITICAL ORGANIZATIONAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Ozan Nadir ALAKAVUKLAR
Sayfa
1–10
Yayın Tarihi
2009-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Such recognition would help to prevent the abuse of organizational power under the name of management.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Organizations are arenas where discourses are built and implicated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to demonstrate hidden motives that lie beneath the organizational discourses employed by the executives in order to manipulate and manage employees.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Such recognition would help to prevent the abuse of organizational power under the name of management.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Critical Management Studies · Organizational Discourse Analysis · Family Metaphor

Abstract

Organizations are arenas where discourses are built and implicated. One of the discourses used in the organizations is the “family” discourse which is realized as “we are a family”. Such an approach aims to construct a meaning that contains not just only pragmatist and rational relations in an organization, but also an illusion of an intense emotional experience. Nature of such a discourse is paradoxical. As an intentional constructed entity organization lacks basic characteristics of a family such as kinship, family bonding and intimate relationships. Therefore, the main assumption of the study is that such a family discourse helps hiding the contradictions and the socio-political structure of the organizations that emerge from the nature-of-organization. Accordingly, the definition of family concept is examined within disciplines of psychology/ sociology and the reality of the family discourse is compared with a critical perspective. This study aims to demonstrate hidden motives that lie beneath the organizational discourses employed by the executives in order to manipulate and manage employees. Such recognition would help to prevent the abuse of organizational power under the name of management.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALAKAVUKLAR, O. N. (2009). “WE ARE A FAMILY” – A CRITICAL ORGANIZATIONAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/993381

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Ainsworth, Susan & Cox, Julie Wolfram (2003), “Families Divided: Culture and Control in Small Family Business”, Organization Studies, Vol: 24, No: 9, pp. 1463 – 1485. Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris (2000), “Critical Discourse Analysis”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol: 29, pp. 447 – 466. Boje, David M. (1995), “Stories of the Story-telling Organization: A Postmodern Analysis of Disney as Tamara-land”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol: 38, No: 4, pp. 997 – 1035. Britannica Online (2009), Family, http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9109754, [Accessed 2.06.2009]
  2. Brotheridge, Celeste M. & Lee, Raymond T. (2006), “We are family: Congruity between organizational and family functioning constructs”, Human Relations, Vol: 59, No: 1 pp. 141 – 161. Burrell, Gibson & Morgan, Gareth (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London: Heinemann. Casey, Catherine (1999), “Come, Join Our Family: Discipline and Integration in Corporate Organizational Culture”, Human Relations, Vol: 52, No: 2, pp. 155 – 178. Clegg, Stewart & Dunkerley, David (1980),
  3. Organization, Class & Control, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Cornelissen, Joep P. (2005), “Beyond Compare: Metaphor in Organization Theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol: 30, No: 4, pp. 751 - 764. Coser, Rose Laub (1964), The family: Its structures and functions. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  4. Fairclough, Norman (1995), Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman. Foucault, Michel (1979), Discipline and punish: Birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Gabriel, Yiannis (1999), “Beyond Happy Families: A Critical Reevaluation of the Control Resistance-Identity Triangle “, Human Relations, Vol: 52, No: 2, pp. 179 – 203. Gibson, Cristina B. & Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E. (2001), “Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol: 46, No: 2, pp. 274 – Grant, David, Hardy, Cynthia, Oswick, Clifford, Oswick & Putnam, Linda L. (2004), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, London: Sage. Handel, Michael J. (2002),
  5. The Sociology of Organizations, London: Sage. Hardy, Cynthia (2001), “Researching organizational discourse”, International Studies in Management and Organization, Vol: 31, No: 3, pp. 25-47.
  6. Hatch, Mary J. & Cunliffe, Ann (2006),
  7. Organization Theory, USA: Oxford University Press.
  8. Legge, Karen (1999), “Representing People at Work”, Organization, Vol: 6, No: 2, pp. 247 – 264. Levin, Irene (1999), “What Phe