KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners

Aynur KESEN MUTLU
Mehdi SOLHİ ANDARAB
Cemil Gokhan KARACAN
Sayfa
249–255
Yayın Tarihi
2019-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings also revealed that the participants’ strategy use was not related to their degree of self-confidence.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to explore the relationship between Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ self-efficacy level and their use of compensatory strategies (CSs).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition, the two least frequently used strategies were word coinage (i.e., creating a non-existent second language word based on a supposed rule) and avoidance (i.e., avoiding a topic, concept, grammatical construction, or phonological element that poses difficulty).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings also revealed that the participants’ strategy use was not related to their degree of self-confidence.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Compensatory strategies · self-efficacy · EFL learners

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ self-efficacy level and their use of compensatory strategies (CSs). The study further searched into the most and the least frequently used CSs by Turkish EFL learners. The participants of the study were fifty university students enrolled in the department of English Language Teaching at a private university in Istanbul, Turkey. Results indicated that the level of self-efficacy among Turkish learners of EFL was high. The top two most frequently used CSs by the learners were concluded to be the use of non-verbal signals (i.e., mime, gesture, facial expression) and circumlocution (i.e., describing an object or idea with a definition). In addition, the two least frequently used strategies were word coinage (i.e., creating a non-existent second language word based on a supposed rule) and avoidance (i.e., avoiding a topic, concept, grammatical construction, or phonological element that poses difficulty). The findings also revealed that the participants’ strategy use was not related to their degree of self-confidence.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MUTLU, A. K., ANDARAB, M. S., KARACAN, C. G. (2019). Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 249–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/987191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Bandura, A. (1995). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice Hall. Basaran, S., & Cabaroglu, N. (2014). The effect of language learning podcasts on English self-efficacy. International Journal of Language Academy, 2(2), 48–69.
  2. Borton, W. M. (1991, April). Empowering teachers and students in a restructuring school: A teacher efficacy interaction model and the effect on reading outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 341) Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353–363.
  3. Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivée, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(2), 153–164.
  4. Brady-Amoon, P., & Fuertes, J. N. (2011). Self-efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment, and academic performance. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(4), 431–438.
  5. Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M., & Zientarski, W. A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 151–184.
  6. Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490.
  7. Carmichael, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2005). Analysis of student beliefs in a tertiary preparatory mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 713–719.
  8. Chen, H. Y. (2017, February 5). The relationship between EFL learners' self-efficacy beliefs and English performance. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_ migr_etd-3846 Demirel, M. (2012). Language learning strategies of undergraduate students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 141–153.
  9. Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 499–505.
  10. Gahungu, N. O. (2018, May 27). The relationships among strategy use, self-effica