Dergiler / Ankara Bar Review / 2008 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Assessment of Proportional Litigation and Retainer Charges in Full Remedy Actions

Sayfa
101–107
Yayın Tarihi
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGÜVEN, A. V. (2008). Assessment of Proportional Litigation and Retainer Charges in Full Remedy Actions. Ankara Bar Review, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 101–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/981741

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...