Dergiler / İstanbul Rumeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

SHAPE ANALYSİS OF THE OLECRANON İN COWS, SHEEP AND HORSES

Sayfa
13–23
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The highest Mahalanobis distance was between horse and cow (MD: 10.4659).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With the geometric morphometrics method, bones and structures can be examined in terms of shape.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the olecranon of sheep, cattle, and horses was examined by geometric morphometry method, and shape variations between species were revealed. 39 (15 cow, 9 sheep and 15 horse) olecranon was used for this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The highest Mahalanobis distance was between horse and cow (MD: 10.4659).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antebrachial bones · Geometric Morphometrics · Veterinary Anatomy

Özet

With the geometric morphometrics method, bones and structures can be examined in terms of shape. In this study, the olecranon of sheep, cattle, and horses was examined by geometric morphometry method, and shape variations between species were revealed. 39 (15 cow, 9 sheep and 15 horse) olecranon was used for this study. Images of olecranon were acquired for geometric morphometrics. Five Landmarks and 37 semilandmarks were used. A total of 39 principal component analyses were obtained as a result of the shape analysis. PC1 is responsible mostly for the shape between species, declared 25.8 % of the total variation. PC2 declared 17.2 % of the total variation and PC3 declared 11.5 % of the total variation. Shape and centroid size were statistically different between groups (p<0.0001). The PC1 value of horses was generally lower than that of cows and sheep. For PC1, sheep had wider shape variation. Cows had the highest PC1 values. The CV1 value was in the lowest cow. The highest CV1 value was in the horses. The CV2 value was higher in sheep compared to other breeds. The olecranon of cows was larger in shape than other species. In horses, the olecranon was narrower. The anconeus process was narrower in shape in horses. Olecranon was longer in shape in sheep than in other species. The difference in shape was statistically significant between all three species for CVA. The biggest difference in shape was between horse and cow (p<0.0001). The highest Mahalanobis distance was between horse and cow (MD: 10.4659).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MANUTA, N., GÜNDEMİR, O., DURO, S. (2023). SHAPE ANALYSİS OF THE OLECRANON İN COWS, SHEEP AND HORSES. İstanbul Rumeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 13–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/977300

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Aiello LC, Dean C. (1990). “An Introduction to Human Evolutionary Anatomy”, London: Academic Press.
  2. Bauchot R, Stephan H. (1964). “Le poids ence ́phalique chez les insectivores malgaches”, Acta Zoo 4(5):63-75.
  3. Barone R. (1986). Anatomie comparée des mammifères domestiques. Tome II. Arthrologie et Myologie Vigot Frères, Paris. Demircioglu I., Duro S., Gungoren G., Choudhary OP., Gundemir O. 2022. Digits angle and digits length ratio in japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Indian Journal of Animal Research 56 (9), 1105-1109.
  4. Duro, S., Gündemir, O., Sönmez, B., Jashari, T., Szara, T., Pazvant, G., & Kambo, A. (2021). “A different perspective on sex dimorphism in the adult Hermann's tortoise: geometric morphometry”. Zoological Studies, 60. Dursun Nejdet. (2007). Veteriner Anatomi I. Medisan yayinevi Ankara. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Anatomi Anabilim Dalı. Getty. R. Sisson and Grossman's. (1975). “The Anatomy of The Domestic Animals” (5th ed), WB Saunders, Philadelphia. Gündemir, O., Özkan, E., Dayan, M. O., & AYDOĞDU, S. (2020). “Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric-morphometric methods”. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 44(3), 681-687.
  5. Gündemir MG, Szara T, Spataru C, Demircioglu I, Turek B, Petrovas G, Spataru MC. (2022). Shape differences of the Carina sterni in birds of various locomotion types. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12870. Gürbüz, İ., Demiraslan, Y., Rajapakse, C., Weerakoon, D. K., Fernando, S., Spataru, MC., & Gündemir, O. (2022). Skull of the Asian (Paradoxurus Hermaphroditus) and the golden (Paradoxurus Zeylonensis) palm civet:” Geometric morphometric analysis using palate, tooth and frontal landmarks”. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 51(6):718-727.
  6. Grand, T. I. (1967). “The functional anatomy of the ankle and foot of the slow loris (Nycticebus coucang)”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2(6): 207-218.
  7. Jashari, T., Duro, S., Gündemir, O., Szara, T., Ilieski, V., Mamuti, D., & Choudhary, O. P. (2022). “Morphology, morphometry and some aspects of clinical anatomy in the skull and mandible of Sharri sheep”. Biologia, 77(2), 423-433.
  8. Klingenberg, C.P.; Marugán-Lobón, J. (2013). “Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: Analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context”. Systematic Biology, 6(2):591–610.
  9. Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ. (2011). “An integrated software package for geometric morphom