KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / CURARE Journal of Nursing / 2023 / Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index

Meryem YILDIZ AYVAZ
Nuray ENÇ
Sayfa
23–29
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the ACS Response Index has been found to be a valid and reliable tool for the Turkish population.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This research was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index, which is used to evaluate patient’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about the symptoms of ACS.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The methodologic study was conducted between March-October 2015 in a cardiology service of a research university and constitutes a sample of 165 patients who were diagnosed as having ACS.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the ACS Response Index has been found to be a valid and reliable tool for the Turkish population.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Acute coronary syndrome · reliability · validity

Abstract

Objective: This research was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index, which is used to evaluate patient’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about the symptoms of ACS. Materials and Methods: The methodologic study was conducted between March-October 2015 in a cardiology service of a research university and constitutes a sample of 165 patients who were diagnosed as having ACS. For linguistic validation, an expert panel of six academicians was formed, with the Turkish form being finalized according to their recommendations. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed for the construct validity. Results: The Kuder-Richardson 20 formula for the first subscale was determined as 0.73, and Cronbach’s alpha of reliability was 0.83 for the second subscale and 0.66 for the third subscale. The test was repeated to evaluate the invariance of the scale and its subscales with respect to time, with no difference being determined between the two implementations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the ACS Response Index has been found to be a valid and reliable tool for the Turkish population.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYVAZ, M. Y., ENÇ, N. (2023). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index. CURARE Journal of Nursing, Sayı: 2, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/976623

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Riegel B, McKinley S, Moser DK, Meischke H, Doering L, Dracup K. Psychometric evaluation of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) response index. Research in Nursing and Health, 2007
  2. 30(6):584-594. google scholar Sevinç S. Vital Decision: Symptom Perception in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Turk J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2014
  3. 5(8):56-65. google scholar World Health Organisation (WHO), 2023. Cardiovascular diseases. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases #tab=tab_1 Access date: 20.05.2023. google scholar Nymark C, Henriksson P, Mattiasson AC, Saboonchi F, Kiessling A. Inability to act was associated with an extended delay prior to care-seeking, in patients with an acute myocardial infarction. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2019
  4. 18(6):512-520. google scholar Wechkunanukul K, Grantham H, Clark RA. Global review of delay time in seeking medical care for chest pain: an integrative literatüre review. Aust Crit Care 2017
  5. 30(1):13-20 google scholar Arrebola-Moreno M, Petrova D, Garcia-Retamero R, Rivera-Lopez R, Jordan-Martinez L, Arrebola JP et al. Psychological and cognitive factors related to prehospital delay in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2020:108, 103613 google scholar De Luca GD, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, & Antman EM. Time Delay to Treatment and Mortality in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 2004
  6. google scholar Cao X, Cao Y, Salamonson Y, DiGiacomo M, Chen Y, Chang S, et al. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index (C-ACSRI). International journal of nursing studies, 2012
  7. 49(10):1277-1290. google scholar McKee G, Mooney M, O’Donnell S, O’Brien F, Biddle MJ, Moser DK. Multivariate analysis of predictors of pre-hospital delay in acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2013
  8. 168 (3):2706-2713. google scholar Mooney M, McKee G, Fealy G, O’Brien F, O’Donnell S, Moser D. A randomized controlled trial to reduce prehospital delay time in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). J Emerg Med 2014
  9. 46 (4):495-506. google scholar Albarqouni L, Smenes K, Meinertz T, et al. Patients’ knowledge about symptoms and adequate behaviour during acute myocardial infarction and its impact on delay time findings from the multicentre MEDEA study. Patient Educ Couns 2016
  10. 99 (11):1845-1851. google scholar Farquharson B, Abhyankar P, Smith K, et al. Reducing delay in patients with acute coronary synd