KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2023 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4

ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Meric ALTINTAS KAPTAN
Ecem EDIS
Aslıhan UNLU
Sayfa
50–76
Yayın Tarihi
2023-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Out of ten potential influencing factors hypothesized, seven were verified to be critical determinants of e-Learning effectiveness in architectural education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research aims to identify and investigate different dimensions and underlying factors influencing the successful implementation of e-Learning, from participants’ viewpoint, i.e. architecture students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To examine the constituents of an effective e-Learning experience in education, evaluation themes were formulated as overall substitutability level, cognitive performance, social interaction and engagement, student comprehension and comfort, personal preference, and learners’ satisfaction.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Out of ten potential influencing factors hypothesized, seven were verified to be critical determinants of e-Learning effectiveness in architectural education.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:architectural education · distance education · e-Learning

Abstract

This research aims to identify and investigate different dimensions and underlying factors influencing the successful implementation of e-Learning, from participants’ viewpoint, i.e. architecture students. To examine the constituents of an effective e-Learning experience in education, evaluation themes were formulated as overall substitutability level, cognitive performance, social interaction and engagement, student comprehension and comfort, personal preference, and learners’ satisfaction. Through literature survey and review of mostly referred factors affecting e-Learning efficiency, four dimensions were designated for further elaboration in this study: (i) course characteristics, (ii) participant characteristics, (iii) e-Learning environment, and (iv) prior acquaintance, with each category including several sub-measures. Survey method was employed and a questionnaire was administered to 122 architecture students at both undergraduate and graduate levels to investigate participant perspectives in reference to particular synchronous lectures delivered online. Out of ten potential influencing factors hypothesized, seven were verified to be critical determinants of e-Learning effectiveness in architectural education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAPTAN, M. A., EDIS, E., UNLU, A. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 50–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/963734

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 Altıntaş Kaptan, M., Edis, E., & Ünlü, A. (2021). Challenges in Synchronous e-Learning in Architectural Education. In: Cordan, Ö., Dinçay, D.A., Yurdakul Toker, Ç., Öksüz, E.B., Semizoğlu, S. (eds). Game + Design Education. Springer Series in Design and Innovation, vol 13. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65060-5_32
  2. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010 Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
  3. Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003 Dimock, M. (2019) Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins, Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ (Accessed: February 21, 2023).
  4. Dong, J. Q., & Zhang, X. (2011). Gender differences in adoption of information systems: New findings from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 384–390. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.017 Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x Frimpon, M. F. (2012). A Re-Structuring of the Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Deployment. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 115-127.
  5. Johnson, J. L. (2003). Distance Education: The Complete Guide to Design, Delivery, and Improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  6. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441-450. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008 Kentnor, H. (2015). Distance Education and the Evolution of Online Learning in the United States. (