KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 70

Turkish Adaptation of the Relationship Sabotage Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Rana TURAN
İbrahim YILDIRIM
Sayfa
345–359
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings obtained as a result of the study show that RSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in evaluating the self-sabotage of individuals in their romantic relationships.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, it is aimed to adapt the ‘Relationship Sabotage Scale' (RSS), whose validity and reliability studies were conducted by Peel and Caltabiano (2021), adapting it to Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the first stage of the research, 32 university students were reached for language equivalence study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings obtained as a result of the study show that RSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in evaluating the self-sabotage of individuals in their romantic relationships.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:self-sabotage in relationships · romantic relationships · university students

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to adapt the ‘Relationship Sabotage Scale' (RSS), whose validity and reliability studies were conducted by Peel and Caltabiano (2021), adapting it to Turkish. The adaptation process of the scale was carried out by going through various stages in which the participants were university students. In the first stage of the research, 32 university students were reached for language equivalence study. At the next stage, the study group for the validity and reliability study of the research consists of a total of 266 university students, 150 (56%) female and 116 (44%) male, studying at various faculties in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The construct validity of the RSS was tested with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Confirmatory factor analysis results show that the 12-item and three-factor structure of the original scale was confirmed. It was observed that the item factor loads of the scale ranged from .56 to .95. According to the findings, it is seen that the scale tested with CFA has sufficient goodness-of-fit indices. For the reliability of the scale, the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was calculated; At the end of the analyzes, the total Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found .81, while the Cronbach alpha (α) internal consistency coefficients for the sub-dimensions ranged from .81 to .85. The findings obtained as a result of the study show that RSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in evaluating the self-sabotage of individuals in their romantic relationships.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TURAN, R., YILDIRIM, İ. (2023). Turkish Adaptation of the Relationship Sabotage Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 70, 345–359. https://ajindex.com/articles/963464

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akın, A., Abacı, R., & Akın, Ü. (2011). Self-Handicapping: A Conceptual Analysis. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3). Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E., & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0502_2
  2. Avcı, Ö. H. (2014). Development of dyadic relationship scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 56(56), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.56.6
  3. Ayduk, O., Downey, G., Testa, A., Yen, Y., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women? Social Cognition, 17(2), 245-271.
  4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (ss. 136–162). CA: Sage. Burunat, E. (2019). Love is a physiological motivation (like hunger, thirst, sleep or sex). Medical hypotheses, 129, 109225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.05.011
  5. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 For Windows: A Guide For Social Scientists. Routledge. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Research Methods in Education]. Pegem Academy. Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming. 2nd ed. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group Cassidy, J. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: A development perspective on individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 4, 111-131.
  6. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
  7. Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
  8. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları [Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications] (Vol. 2). Pegem Academy. Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Rincon, C. (1999). Rejection sensitivity and adolescent romantic relationships. The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence, 148-174.
  9. Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-