KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Some Micro Nutrients in Husk and Grain of Oat Genotypes

Leyla İDİKUT
Songül ÇİFTÇİ
Gülay ZULKADİR
Ziya DUMLUPINAR
Ali ÖZKAN
Meryem Delal YAMAN
Sayfa
1–8
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results, thousand seeds (grain + husk) weight was found as 26.170 to 45.510 g, test weight (grain + husk) was 47.8 to 54.3 kg, protein ratio of grain was 13.97 to 16.55%, groat percentage was 66.31 to 73.33%, husk ratio was 26.67 to 33.68%, iron content of grain was 22.75 to 39.44 mg kg⁻¹, iron content of husk was 54.06 to 90.27 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content in grain was 28.09 to 66.21 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content of husk was 14.04 to 36.59 mg kg⁻¹, calcium content in grain was 83.30 to 191.50 mg kg⁻¹, the calcium content of husk was 313.7 to 442.30 mg kg⁻¹.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Oat is one of the important cereal crops due to its high nutritional content and versatile usage in human diet and animal feed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, it was aimed to examine some nutritional values of grain and husk and, some quality traits of five commercial oat varieties and six advanced oat lines under Kahramanmaraş conditions in 2016-2017 cropping year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results, thousand seeds (grain + husk) weight was found as 26.170 to 45.510 g, test weight (grain + husk) was 47.8 to 54.3 kg, protein ratio of grain was 13.97 to 16.55%, groat percentage was 66.31 to 73.33%, husk ratio was 26.67 to 33.68%, iron content of grain was 22.75 to 39.44 mg kg⁻¹, iron content of husk was 54.06 to 90.27 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content in grain was 28.09 to 66.21 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content of husk was 14.04 to 36.59 mg kg⁻¹, calcium content in grain was 83.30 to 191.50 mg kg⁻¹, the calcium content of husk was 313.7 to 442.30 mg kg⁻¹.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Oats · seed · husk

Abstract

Oat is one of the important cereal crops due to its high nutritional content and versatile usage in human diet and animal feed. Therefore, it was aimed to examine some nutritional values of grain and husk and, some quality traits of five commercial oat varieties and six advanced oat lines under Kahramanmaraş conditions in 2016-2017 cropping year. According to the results, thousand seeds (grain + husk) weight was found as 26.170 to 45.510 g, test weight (grain + husk) was 47.8 to 54.3 kg, protein ratio of grain was 13.97 to 16.55%, groat percentage was 66.31 to 73.33%, husk ratio was 26.67 to 33.68%, iron content of grain was 22.75 to 39.44 mg kg⁻¹, iron content of husk was 54.06 to 90.27 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content in grain was 28.09 to 66.21 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content of husk was 14.04 to 36.59 mg kg⁻¹, calcium content in grain was 83.30 to 191.50 mg kg⁻¹, the calcium content of husk was 313.7 to 442.30 mg kg⁻¹.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İDİKUT, L., ÇİFTÇİ, S., ZULKADİR, G., DUMLUPINAR, Z., ÖZKAN, A., YAMAN, M. D. (2023). Some Micro Nutrients in Husk and Grain of Oat Genotypes. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/963432

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Yalcin TG. Determination of phytic acid and mineral contents of oat breeding samples. Hacettepe University, Food Engineering Department. The Degree of Master of Science. Ankara, 2018
  2. Yaver E, Ertas N. Composition oats, grain endustry uses and effects on human health. Journal of Food and Feed Science-Techonology, 2013; 13: 41–50
  3. Menon R, Gonzalez T, Ferruzzi M, Jackson E, Winderl D, Watson J. Oats-from farm to fork, advances in food and nutrition research. 1st ed. Elsevier Inc. (pp. 77:1-55), 2016.
  4. Sari N, Imamoglu A, Yildiz O. Determination of advanced oat lines for Menemen ecological conditions. Journal of Anatolia Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 2011; 21(1): 16-25
  5. Decker EA, Rose DJ, Stewart D. Processing of oats and the impact of processing operations on nutrition and health benefits. British Journal of Nutrition, 2014; 112: S58–S64.
  6. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2010; 41: 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa. 2009.12.004 [7] Barbieri V, Lassinantti Gualtieri M, Siligardi C. Wheat husk: a renewable resource for bio-based building materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2020; 251: 118909.
  7. Lehtinen P, Kaukovirta-Norja A. Oat lipids, enzymes and quality. In: Lehtinen P, Francis H, Wood Peter J. (eds). OATS: Chemistry and Technology, 2011.
  8. Makinen OE, Sozer N, Ercili-Cura D, Poutanen K. Protein from oat: Structure, processes, functionality and nutrition. Sustainable protein sources, 2017; 105-119.
  9. Coskun G, Bahar B. Cereals and Pseudo-cereals in terms of chemical composition. Turkish Journal of Science and Health, 2020; 1(1): 52-60
  10. Youssef MKE, Nassar AG, EL–Fishawy FA, Mostafa MA. Assessment of proximate chemical composition and nutritional status of wheat biscuits fortified with oat powder. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016; 47(5): 83–94
  11. Ma BL, Zheng Z, Pageau D, Vera C, Fregeau-Reid J, Xue A, Yan W. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, yield and agronomic traits of oat cultivars as affected by fertilizer N rates under diverse environments. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,