KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5

The effects of Multiple Representation Method and Prior Knowledge Level on Problem Solving Skills and Cognitive Load

Muhammed DAĞLI
Ahmet Feyzi SATICI
Sayfa
119–146
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings supported the expertise reversal effect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the effect of multiple representation method and prior knowledge level in solving ill-structured problems was investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Quasi-experimental and 2x2 (multiple representation method x prior knowledge level) factorial designs were used in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings supported the expertise reversal effect.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Problem solving · Cognitive load · Prior knowledge

Abstract

In this study, the effect of multiple representation method and prior knowledge level in solving ill-structured problems was investigated. Quasi-experimental and 2x2 (multiple representation method x prior knowledge level) factorial designs were used in the study. The study group consists of 39 undergraduate students. The dependent variables of the study were determined as problem solving skills, cognitive load, and permanence. The independent variables were considered as multiple representation method (step-by-step, holistic) and prior knowledge levels (novice, expert). Prior knowledge level test, problem solving skills test and cognitive load scale developed to measure the variables were used as data collection tools within the scope of the study. The data was analysed with two-way analysis of variance and independent groups t-test as the data obtained from the data collection tools exhibited normal distribution. In the results that were significant in the analysis, Cohen (d) in the independent groups t-tests and eta-square (η2) in the two-way analysis of variance were also shown. As a result of the research, it is evident that the level of prior knowledge and the interaction (interaction effect) of the level of prior knowledge and the multiple representation method affect problem solving skills. In addition, it was concluded that the interaction of multiple representation method and prior knowledge level was statistically significant in terms of cognitive load variable. The findings supported the expertise reversal effect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DAĞLI, M., SATICI, A. F. (2023). The effects of Multiple Representation Method and Prior Knowledge Level on Problem Solving Skills and Cognitive Load. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5, 119–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/961169

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Ahmed, A., Hurwitz, D., Gestson, S., & Brown, S. (2021). Differences between Professionals and Students in Their Visual Attention on Multiple Representation Types While Solving an Open-Ended Engineering Design Problem. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 147(3), 04021005. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & education, 33(2-3), 131-152.
  2. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
  3. Armougum, A., Gaston-Bellegarde, A., Joie-La Marle, C., & Piolino, P. (2020). Expertise reversal effect: Cost of generating new schemas. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106406. Bayrak, B. K., & Bayram, H. (2010). Effect of computer aided teaching of acid-base subject on the attitude towards science and technology class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2194-2196.
  4. Blayney, P., Kalyuga, S., and Sweller, J. (2015). Using cognitive load theory to tailor instruction to levels of accounting students’ expertise. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 199–210.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Deneysel desenler: öntest-sontest kontrol grubu, desen ve veri analizi [Experimental designs: pretest-posttest control group, design and data analysis], 5th Edition, Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing. Bossé, M. J., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Cheetham, M. (2011). Translations Among Mathematical Representations: Teacher Beliefs and Practices. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning. Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). Enhancing pre-service science teachers' use of multiple levels of representation to describe and explain chemical reactions. School Science Review, 88(325), 115. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive psychology, 4(1), 55-81.
  6. Chen, P. P. S. (1976). The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 1(1), 9-36.
  7. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
  8. Chi, M. T. H., and Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (2004). Procedures for conducting content analysis of science textbooks. Available from the Univ