KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1

Access Opportunities of Earthquake Victims to Distance Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Tuba Gün Çıngı(ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8412-7364
Sayfa
155–166
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study is essential in revealing that students’ multiple disadvantaged positions negatively affect their distance education participation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Covid-19 pandemic has caused extensive changes in education, as in other fields, and the distance education system has been widely implemented as an alternative almost all over the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research was carried out in the province of Elazig, which experienced an earthquake in January 2020 and focuses on the access of students in primary and secondary school to distance education.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study is essential in revealing that students’ multiple disadvantaged positions negatively affect their distance education participation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Digital inequalities · Distance education · Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has caused extensive changes in education, as in other fields, and the distance education system has been widely implemented as an alternative almost all over the world. However, these new conditions are not equal for everyone; the position of certain social groups has become more disadvantageous in this process. One of these groups is earthquake victims. This study aims to reveal the possibilities and practices of students who lost their homes due to an earthquake and lived in a container city during the pandemic to participate in distance education. The research was carried out in the province of Elazig, which experienced an earthquake in January 2020 and focuses on the access of students in primary and secondary school to distance education. A qualitative research method was adopted in this research, and interviews were conducted with 11 people who are teachers and parents of students. The findings revealed that students are in a disadvantageous position regarding physical access, ownership, skills, and usage opportunities in accessing the digital equipment and environments required by distance education. Students are mainly unable to access technological tools and the Internet. Students’ age, economic and cultural capital, inadequacies caused by physical access restrictions, and psychological, social, economic, and spatial problems triggered by earthquakes and pandemics have greatly restricted their ability and opportunities to access distance education. The study is essential in revealing that students’ multiple disadvantaged positions negatively affect their distance education participation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çıngı, T. G. (2023). Access Opportunities of Earthquake Victims to Distance Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0030A

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (39)

  1. Arun, Ö., & Elmas, Ç. (2020). Türkiye’de dijital eşitsizliğin toplumsal kökenleri. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Dijital kültür, dijital eşitsizlikler ve yaşlanma (pp. 115-135). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
  2. Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277 google scholar
  3. Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F146879410100100307 google scholar
  4. Binark, M. (2015). Yeni medya çalışmaları özel sayısı hakkında: Neden? Folklor&Edebiyat, 21(83), 9-18. google scholar
  5. https://www.academia.edu/17281625/Yeni_Medya_Çalışmaları_Özel_SayısıHakkında_Neden?from=cover_page google scholar
  6. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607 google scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage. google scholar
  8. Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education. google scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage. google scholar
  11. Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(7-8), 1001-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00350-0 google scholar
  12. Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259602000407 google scholar
  13. Denzin. N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-32). Sage. google scholar
  14. DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, 4(1), 1-23. https://digitalinclusion.typepad.com/digital_inclusion/documentos/digitalinequality.pdf google scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
  16. Guggenheim, M. (2014). Introduction: Disasters as politics - politics as disasters. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-954X.12121 google scholar
  17. Halford, S., & Savage, M. (2010). Reconceptualizing digital social inequality. Information, Communitaiın & Society, 13(7), 937-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.499956 google scholar
  18. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942/864 google scholar
  19. Idris, M., Hussain, S., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Relationship between parents’ education and their children’s academic achievement. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 7(2), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(82-92) google scholar
  20. Istanbul Technical University. (2020). An overview of the state of digital development around the world based on ITU data. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Dashboards/Pages/Digital-Development.aspx google scholar
  21. Lee, J. S., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00028312043002193 google scholar
  22. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-2/onwuegbuzie2.pdf google scholar
  23. Özsoy, D. (2020). Dijital bölünme düzeylerine dair literatür analizi. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Dijital Kültür, Dijital Eşitsizlikler ve Yaşlanma (pp. 11-24). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
  24. Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. (2017) Social capital and the three levels of digital divide. In M. Regnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 21-34). Routledge. google scholar
  25. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. (2020). Bakan Selçuk, koronavirüse karşı eğitim alanında alınan tedbirleri açıkladı. http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-koronaviruse-karsi-egitim-alaninda-alinan-tedbirleri-acikladi/haber/20497/tr google scholar
  26. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6 (3), 341-362.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519 google scholar
  27. Sezgin, S., & Fırat, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisinde uzaktan eğitime geçiş ve djital uçurum tehlikesi. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 37-54. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/57638/767299 google scholar
  28. Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gur, B. S., Perc, M., & Ozer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 61(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0034 google scholar
  29. Sütlüoğlu, T. (2020). Orta yaş ve üzerindeki bireylerde djital eşitsizliğin görünümleri: Erişim eşitsizlikleri ve kullanım farklılıkları. In M. Fiğan & Y. D. Özdemir (Eds.), Djital kültür, djital eşitsizlikler ve yaşlanma (pp. 215-246). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. google scholar
  30. UNESCO. (2020). Startling digital divides in distance learning emerge. https://en.unesco.org/news/startling-%20digital-divides-distance-learning-emerge google scholar
  31. UNICEF. (2020). Covid -19 and children. https://data.unicef.org/covid-19-and-children/ google scholar
  32. van Deursen, A., & J., Helsper, E. J. (2015). Third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Distinctions and Inequalities Studies in Media and Communications, 10, 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002 google scholar
  33. Van Djk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage. google scholar
  34. Van Djk, J. A., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487 google scholar
  35. Varışlı, B.(2021). Pandemi sürecinde eğitimin dönüşümü: Çevrimiçi eğitimin sosyolojik yansımaları. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(26), 237-249. google scholar
  36. Yazgan, Ç. Ü. (2022). Attitudes and interaction practices towards distance education during the pandemic. Education and Information Technolo-gies, 27(4), 5349-5364. google scholar
  37. Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
  38. Yıldız, A., Vural, R. A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi ve derinleşen eğitim eşitsizlikleri. Covid-19 Pandemisi Altıncı Ay Değerlendirme Raporu. google scholar
  39. TTB. https://www.ttb.org.tr/kutuphane/covid19-rapor_6/covid19-rapor_6_Part64.pdf google scholar