Dergiler / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Examination of Scientific Production on Badminton: A Content Analysis

Sayfa
146–166
Yayın Tarihi
2023-08-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result; it has been determined that scientific productions on badminton are mostly studies on exercise and sports physiology in which physiological, anthropometric and motoric measurements are taken by conducting experimental studies on athletes selected by simple random sampling.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this research is the examination of scientific production on badminton.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data were obtained from studies published in the British Medical Journal, Eric, ULAKBIM National Databases, WOS, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and YÖK National Theses Center databases between 1939 and 2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result; it has been determined that scientific productions on badminton are mostly studies on exercise and sports physiology in which physiological, anthropometric and motoric measurements are taken by conducting experimental studies on athletes selected by simple random sampling.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Articles · Badminton · Content Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this research is the examination of scientific production on badminton. The data were obtained from studies published in the British Medical Journal, Eric, ULAKBIM National Databases, WOS, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and YÖK National Theses Center databases between 1939 and 2020. A total of 856 publications, including 624 articles, 134 proceedings papers, 71 M.Sc. theses, and 27 Ph.D. dissertations, were included in the research. The data obtained from these studies was analyzed using content analysis. Most publications were produced between 2016 and 2020. 751 publications in English and 105 in Turkish. It was observed that the distribution of the number of productions and the number of authors were close to each other. 134 proceedings papers (90 full-texts, 44 abstracts) were identified. Of the studies, 670 were quantitative, 105 were qualitative, 54 were mixed design, and 27 were reviews. Experimental design was used the most, and historical design was used the least. Stratified and simple random sampling methods were mainly used. Most studies were conducted with athletes, and the least with instructors (coaches and teachers). Most studies were conducted on exercise and sports physiology and the least on physical education, games, and recreation. The studies focused on physiological, anthropometric, and motoric measurements as the main themes. As a result; it has been determined that scientific productions on badminton are mostly studies on exercise and sports physiology in which physiological, anthropometric and motoric measurements are taken by conducting experimental studies on athletes selected by simple random sampling.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKARSU, M., DOĞAR, Y. (2023). Examination of Scientific Production on Badminton: A Content Analysis. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 146–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/958807

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Atalay, A. (2017). Türkiye’de spor yönetimi araştırmalarındaki eğilimler: Bir içerik analizi [Trends in sports management research in Turkey: A content analysis]. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(29), 107–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12512
  2. Atılgan, D. (2020). Bilginin organizasyonunda ulusal dizinlerin önemi ve atıf sistemi üzerine düşünceler [Reflections on the importance of national indexes in the organization of knowledge and the citation system]. http://eprints.rclis.org/7234/1/bilgininoragnizasyonu.pdf
  3. Babur, A., Kiper, A., Çukurbaşı, B., & Özer, Ö., Tonbuloğlu, İ., Küçük, Ş., Demirhan, E., Güngören, Ö., Kıyıcı, M., & Horzum, M. (2016). 2009-2013 yılları arasında uzaktan eğitim dergilerinde yayınlanan makalelerin yöntemsel açıdan incelenmesi [Methodological analysis of articles published in distance education journals between 2009 and 2013]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.70220
  4. Bebetos, E., & Antoniou, P. (2003). Psychological skills of greek badminton athletes perceptual and motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(3suppl), 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1289
  5. Biçer, N. (2017). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretimi alanında yayınlanan makaleler üzerine bir analiz çalışması [An analysis study on the articles published in the field of teaching Turkish to foreigners]. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 27, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.5505/pausbed.2017.69772
  6. Biricik, Y. S. (2020). Türkiye'de spor yönetimi disiplininde yapılmış olan tezlerin içerik analizi [Content analysis of theses made in the discipline of sports management in Turkey]. Ekev Academy Journal, 24(81), 523–538. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340252561
  7. Blanca-Torres, J. C., Ortega, E., Nikolaidis, P. T., & Torres-Luque, G. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of scientific production in badminton. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.152.03
  8. Büyükergün, A. (2020). 1985-2018 Yılları Arası Türkiye’de basketbol branşında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of postgraduate theses in the tennis branch in Turkey between 1990-2018]. Sports Education Magazine, 4(1), 20–29.
  9. Callow, N., Hardy, L., & Hall, C. (2001). The effects of a motivational general-mastery imagery intervention on the sport confidence of high-level badminton players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(4)