KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

The Status of Students’ Didactic Self-Assessment in The Romanian University Curriculum

Vlantin BLANDUL
Adela BRADEA
Sayfa
54–64
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results showed that most respondents tend to underestimate themselves, this depending, among other things, on the quality of their academic preparation or on the way exams are carried out.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Even though many students and teachers tend to minimize its relevance, didactic self-assessment is one of the most important components of the instructive-educational process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It can be defined as the students’ ability to make value judgments about their own academic performance, based on sound logical and psychological arguments.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results showed that most respondents tend to underestimate themselves, this depending, among other things, on the quality of their academic preparation or on the way exams are carried out.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019-2022 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Complementary strategies · didactic evaluation · objectivity

Abstract

Even though many students and teachers tend to minimize its relevance, didactic self-assessment is one of the most important components of the instructive-educational process. It can be defined as the students’ ability to make value judgments about their own academic performance, based on sound logical and psychological arguments. The development of students' self-assessment skills is supported by a number of socio-psychological factors such as: perceived self-efficacy, relevant individuals’ opinions - teachers, parents, etc. as well as by certain pedagogical factors such as: the teacher's didactic style, teaching/learning strategies, type(s) of assessment used, particulars of the information/content taught, etc. The aim of this research was to assess students’ awareness of the importance of training self-assessment skills for their ongoing professional and personal development. The research sample was made up of 336 students from 4 different faculties of the University of Oradea, Romania. They were grouped in 3 series according to their academic year of study (2019-2022). Students were asked to self-assess their own academic performance in a university subject included in the Psycho-pedagogy and Methodology Training Program. The results showed that most respondents tend to underestimate themselves, this depending, among other things, on the quality of their academic preparation or on the way exams are carried out.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BLANDUL, V., BRADEA, A. (2023). The Status of Students’ Didactic Self-Assessment in The Romanian University Curriculum. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 54–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/952375

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 90–105).
  2. Routledge. Andrade, H. L., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, eds G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris, pp.319-334, NY: Routledge. Baars, M., Vink, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A. & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 33, 92–107. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.004 Blândul, V. (2014). Bazele educației formale [Basys of Formal Education], București: ProUniversitaria. Blândul, V., & Bradea, A. (2022). Developing student self-assessment competences in the online learning environment amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In V. Trif (Ed.), Communication and assessment prerequisites for the new normal of education (pp. 140-161). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8247-3.ch009
  3. Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C. & Nunnery, J. A. (2012). The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.004 Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. London: Kogan Page. Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self-assessment and reflection in professional courses. Journal of Social Work Education. 18(2), 121–132. doi: 10.1080/02615479911220131 Bradea, A. (2014). The Role of Metacognition in Teaching. Some current issues in pedagogy, 138-150, International Research Institute s.r.o., Komárno, Slovakia. http://www.irisro.org/educonf2014october/index.html
  4. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research. 3(1), 22–30. doi: 10.14786/flr.v2i1.24 Butler, Y. G. (2018). Young learners' processes and rationales for responding to self-assessment items: cases for generic can-do and five-point Likert-type formats, in J. Davis et al. (Eds). Useful Assessment and Evaluation in Language Education (pp. 21-39),
  5. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvvngrq.5 Dolosic, H. (2018). An examination of self-assessment and