Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Safety Expectations in The Design of Smartphones in Terms of Various Variables

Sayfa
72–89
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The implications of the results are discussed with the support of the studies in the literature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this research, it is aimed to reveal safety expectations of pre-service teachers in the design of smartphones and to examine them in terms of 8 variables as follows: gender, generation (Y-Z), department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, number of smartphones used, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For the collection of data, Safety Expectations in the Design of Smartphones Scale (SEitDoSS) -which was developed as part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis- consisting of 21 items and 5 factors (user-specific expectations, device-specific expectations, integration expectations, health-specific expectations and support expectations) and a Personal Information Form created to collect participants’ information about the variables.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The implications of the results are discussed with the support of the studies in the literature.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Smartphone · safety by design · safety expectations

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to reveal safety expectations of pre-service teachers in the design of smartphones and to examine them in terms of 8 variables as follows: gender, generation (Y-Z), department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, number of smartphones used, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. Quantitative research method was adopted, and the relational survey model was used. For the collection of data, Safety Expectations in the Design of Smartphones Scale (SEitDoSS) -which was developed as part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis- consisting of 21 items and 5 factors (user-specific expectations, device-specific expectations, integration expectations, health-specific expectations and support expectations) and a Personal Information Form created to collect participants’ information about the variables. Anadolu and Osmangazi Universities (universities in Eskişehir province of Türkiye) were selected to obtain data. The application was carried out online in the spring semester of the 2020-2021 Academic Year, and a total of 252 participants were reached during the 8-week application. According to the results, pre-service teachers’ safety expectations in the design of smartphones are generally high. There was a significant difference in at least one dimension in terms of 7 variables: gender, generation, department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. According to the “number of smartphones used”, there was no significant difference in terms of safety expectations of smartphones in design. The implications of the results are discussed with the support of the studies in the literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOZKOPARAN, S. B., ODABAŞI, F. (2023). Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Safety Expectations in The Design of Smartphones in Terms of Various Variables. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 72–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/951479

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Al-Qershi, F., Al-Qurishi, M., Rahman, S. M. M., & Al-Amri, A. (2014, January). Android vs. iOS: The security battle. In 2014 World Congress on Computer Applications and Information Systems (WCCAIS) (pp. 1-8).
  2. IEEE. Ameen, N. & Willis, R. (2018). Towards closing the gender gap in Iraq: understanding gender differences in smartphone adoption and use. Information Technology for Development, 1-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1454877.
  3. Balce, A. O., & Yardımoğlu, P. B. (2016). Investigating of college students’ smartphone preferences. Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies, 3(1), 8-26.
  4. Benenson, Z., Gassmann, F. & Reinfelder, L. (2013). Android and iOS users’ differences concerning security and privacy. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 817-822).
  5. BinDhim, N. F. & Trevena, L. (2015a). Health-related smartphone apps: regulations, safety, privacy and quality. BMJ Innov, 1(2), 43-45.
  6. BinDhim, N. F. & Trevena, L. (2015b). There’s an app for that: a guide for healthcare practitioners and researchers on smartphone technology. Online journal of public health informatics, 7(2), 1-12. DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5522. Büyükgöze, S. (2019). Security model investigations of mobile application markets. TBV Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 12(1), 9-18.
  7. Cemaloğlu, N. & Şahin, D. E. (2007). A study of the teacher’s burnout level according to various variables. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 465-484.
  8. Corti, A., Manzoni, V., Savaresi, S. M., Santucci, M. D. & Di Tanna, O. (2012). A centralized real-time driver assistance system for road safety based on smartphone. In Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2012 (pp. 221-230).
  9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Çakır, F. & Demir, N. (2014). A study on determining preferences of university students’ purchasing smartphone. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journa], 29(1), 213-243.
  10. Deyan, G. (2019). 61+ Revealing Smartphone Statistics For 2019. Techjury. Retrieved September 9, 2021from https://techjury.net/stats-about/smartphone-usage/#gref.
  11. Fitryasari, R., Tristiana, R., D., & Yusuf, A. (2021). Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Model Based on Health Promotion Theory. Jurnal Ners, 16(2). 148-154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v16i2.29650.
  12. Goswami, A. and Dutta, S. (2015). Gender differences in technology usage - A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 51-59.
  13. Harris, B. (2021), ‘Tec