Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2023 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3

Application of Soft Computing Techniques in River Flow Modeling

Sayfa
634–642
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results were analyzed with a Taylor diagram and time series graphs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Modeling of data is critical in the analysis and evaluation of hydrological behavior.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the flow data of fourteen stations located in the Euphrates-Tigris basin between 1981 and 2010 were used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results were analyzed with a Taylor diagram and time series graphs.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:ANFIS · ELM · ENN

Abstract

Modeling of data is critical in the analysis and evaluation of hydrological behavior. River flow data is one of the most important data in explaining hydrology. Management of water resources; It takes place in the literature as an area that needs to be investigated in order to provide early warning for undesirable situations such as floods and drought. For this reason, it is of important to develop different techniques for the estimation and modeling of river flow or to make comparisons between techniques. In this study, the flow data of fourteen stations located in the Euphrates-Tigris basin between 1981 and 2010 were used. Adaptive Network Based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), Support Vector Machine (SVM) techniques that are frequently used in the literature, and newly introduced Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Emotional Neural Network (ENN) artificial intelligence techniques are compared. In addition, considering all performance indices, it was determined which technique gave better results with rank analysis. Although all models worked well, it was seen that the methods were ranked as ELM, GPR, ENN, SVM and ANFIS starting from the best. This has shown that ELM, GPR and ENN methods, which have been used recently in flow modeling, give better results than traditional methods with complex structures. In addition, flow values were used in the whole study and these values were examined in 3 different combinations. It was seen that the model structure that gave the best performance was the model structure that used the flow data from one, two and three days ago as an estimator. The results were analyzed with a Taylor diagram and time series graphs.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YESİLYURT, S. N., DALKILIÇ, H. Y., SAMUI, P. (2023). Application of Soft Computing Techniques in River Flow Modeling. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 634–642. https://ajindex.com/articles/950652

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Y. Zhou, S. Guo, F. Chang, "Explore an Evolutionary Recurrent ANFIS for Modelling Multi-Step-Ahead Flood Forecasts", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 570, pp. 343-355, 2019.
  2. Z. He, X. Wen, H. Liu, J. Du, "A Comparative Study Of Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy İnference System And Support Vector Machine For Forecasting River Flow İn The Semiarid Mountain Region", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 509, pp. 379-386, 2014.
  3. Z. Yaseen, S. Sulaiman, R. Deo, K. Chau, "An Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine Model For River Flow Forecasting: State-Of-The-Art, Practical Applications İn Water Resource Engineering Area And Future Research Direction", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 569, pp. 387-408, 2019.
  4. Z. Yaseen, S. R. Naganna, Z. Sa’adi, P. Samui, M.A. Ghorbani, S. Shahid, "Hourly River Flow Forecasting: Application Of Emotional Neural Network Versus Multiple Machine Learning Paradigms", Water Resources Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1075-1091, 2020.
  5. Z. Wang, N. F. Attar, K. Khalili, J. Behmanes, S. S. Band, A. Mosavi, K. K. Chau, "Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using A Hybrid Stochastic-Deterministic Approach For Parsimonious Non-Linear Time Series Modeling", Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1351-1372, 2020.
  6. A. Sun, D. Wang, X. Xu, "Monthly Streamflow Forecasting Using Gaussian Process Regression", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 511, pp. 72-81, 2014.
  7. Z. Yaseen, A. El-shafie, O. Jaafar, H. Afan, K. Sayl, "Artificial İntelligence Based Models For Stream-Flow Forecasting: 2000–2015", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 530, pp. 829-844, 2015.
  8. E. Khadangi, H. R. Madvar, M. M. Ebadzadeh “Comparison Of ANFIS And RBF Models İn Daily Stream Flow Forecasting”. In 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, control and Communication (pp. 1-6).
  9. IEEE. G. Huang, Q. Zhu, C. Siew, "Extreme Learning Machine: Theory And Applications", Neurocomputing, vol. 70, no. 1-3, pp. 489-501, 2006.
  10. H. Sıqueıra, L. Boccato, R. Attux, C. Lyra, "Unorganızed Machınes For Seasonal Streamflow Serıes Forecastıng", International Journal of Neural Systems, vol. 24, no. 03, p. 1430009, 2014.
  11. Z. Yaseen, O. Jaafar, R. C. Deo, O. Kisi, J. Adamowski, J. Qulity, A. El-Shafie, "Stream-Flow Forecasting Using Extreme Learning Machines: A Case Study İn A Semi-Arid Region in Iraq", Journal of Hydrology, vol. 542, pp. 603-614, 2016.
  12. R. Adnan, Z. Liang, S. Trajkovic, M. Zounemat-Kermani, B. Li, O. Kisi, "Daily Streamflow Prediction Using Optimally Pruned Extreme Learning Machine", J