Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Investigation of the capability of multi-GNSS PPP-AR method in detecting permanent displacements

Sayfa
251–261
Yayın Tarihi
2023-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings clearly demonstrated the superiority of the PPP-AR technique outperformed the traditional-PPP technique in short-term observation durations and emphasize the contribution of multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) combinations to both methods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The traditional-precise point positioning (PPP) technique may provide a positioning as precise as the relative positioning technique in long-term observation durations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, since it cannot provide high-precision positioning due to ambiguity problem in short-term observations, the interest in the PPP-AR (Ambiguity Resolution) technique has increased.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings clearly demonstrated the superiority of the PPP-AR technique outperformed the traditional-PPP technique in short-term observation durations and emphasize the contribution of multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) combinations to both methods.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Traditional-PPP · PPP-AR · Displacement monitoring

Abstract

The traditional-precise point positioning (PPP) technique may provide a positioning as precise as the relative positioning technique in long-term observation durations. However, since it cannot provide high-precision positioning due to ambiguity problem in short-term observations, the interest in the PPP-AR (Ambiguity Resolution) technique has increased. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of traditional-PPP and PPP-AR techniques for monitoring permanent displacements, considering different observation durations based on different satellite combinations. For this purpose, a displacement simulator that can move precisely in one direction and in the horizontal plane over a small distance was used. 6 different displacements were simulated, and all collected GNSS observations were evaluated with traditional-PPP, PPP-AR, and relative methods. Moreover, these methods were examined by considering the Global Positioning System (GPS), European Global Navigation Satellite System (Galileo), and GPS/Galileo satellite combinations. The findings clearly demonstrated the superiority of the PPP-AR technique outperformed the traditional-PPP technique in short-term observation durations and emphasize the contribution of multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) combinations to both methods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BEZCİOĞLU, M., UCAR, T., YİĞİT, C. Ö. (2023). Investigation of the capability of multi-GNSS PPP-AR method in detecting permanent displacements. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 251–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/949742

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hastaoglu, K. O., & Sanli, D. U. (2011). Monitoring Koyulhisar landslide using rapid static GPS: a strategy to remove biases from vertical velocities. Natural hazards, 58, 1275-1294.
  2. Malet, J. P., Maquaire, O., & Calais, E. (2002). The use of Global Positioning System techniques for the continuous monitoring of landslides: application to the Super-Sauze earthflow (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France). Geomorphology, 43(1-2), 33-54.
  3. Erdoğan, S., Şahin, M., Tiryakioğlu, İ., Gülal, E., & Telli, A. K. (2009). GPS velocity and strain rate fields in Southwest Anatolia from repeated GPS measurements. Sensors, 9(3), 2017-2034.
  4. Hager, B. H., King, R. W., & Murray, M. H. (1991). Measurement of crustal deformation using the Global Positioning System. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 19(1), 351-382.
  5. Tiryakioğlu, I. (2015). Geodetic aspects of the 19 May 2011 Simav earthquake in Turkey. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 6(1), 76-89.
  6. Celebi, M. (2000). GPS in dynamic monitoring of long-period structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 20(5-8), 477-483.
  7. Lovse, J. W., Teskey, W. F., Lachapelle, G., & Cannon, M. E. (1995). Dynamic deformation monitoring of tall structure using GPS technology. Journal of surveying engineering, 121(1), 35-40.
  8. Moschas, F., & Stiros, S. (2011). Measurement of the dynamic displacements and of the modal frequencies of a short-span pedestrian bridge using GPS and an accelerometer. Engineering structures, 33(1), 10-17.
  9. Genrich, J. F., & Bock, Y. (1992). Rapid resolution of crustal motion at short ranges with the Global Positioning System. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 97(B3), 3261-3269.
  10. Bulbul, S., Bilgen, B., & Inal, C. (2021). The performance assessment of Precise Point Positioning (PPP) under various observation conditions. Measurement, 171, 108780. Kouba, J., & Héroux, P. (2001). GPS precise point positioning using IGS orbit products. GPS solutions, 5(2), 12-28.
  11. Li, T., Wang, J., & Laurichesse, D. (2014). Modeling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization. GPS solutions, 18, 429-442.
  12. Zumberge, J. F., Heflin, M. B., Jefferson, D. C., Watkins, M. M., & Webb, F. H. (1997). Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, 102(B3), 5005-5017.
  13. Alçay, S., & Atiz, Ö. (2021). Farklı yazılımlar kullanılarak gerçek zamanlı hassas nokta konum belirleme (R