KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

An Overview of Landslide Management: Scope, Difficulties, Limitations with Future Directions and Opportunities

Nehir Varol(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4876-9313
Leyla Derin Cengiz(Ankara Üniversitesi)0000-0001-7419-1717
Sayfa
609–621
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines scientific expertise, community engagement, and policy support to achieve effective landslide management and reduce the impacts of these natural hazards.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study explores the scope, difficulties, limitations, and future directions of landslide management.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Landslides pose significant threats to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment, necessitating effective management strategies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines scientific expertise, community engagement, and policy support to achieve effective landslide management and reduce the impacts of these natural hazards.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Disaster · Management Landslide Hazard · Landslide Management

Özet

This study explores the scope, difficulties, limitations, and future directions of landslide management. Landslides pose significant threats to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment, necessitating effective management strategies. The study begins by introducing the topic of landslide management and its importance in mitigating landslide risks. It then delves into the scope of landslide management, including activities such as early warning systems, hazard mapping, and slope stabilization. The study highlights the various challenges faced in landslide management, such as limited resources, technical expertise, and data availability. Additionally, it discusses the limitations of current landslide management practices, emphasizing their inability to completely prevent landslides and the reliance on available technologies. Furthermore, the study presents case studies to provide real-world examples and insights into landslide management approaches. Future directions and opportunities in landslide management are explored, including the integration of advanced technologies, community-based approaches, and improved risk assessment techniques. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines scientific expertise, community engagement, and policy support to achieve effective landslide management and reduce the impacts of these natural hazards.

Abstract

This study explores the scope, difficulties, limitations, and future directions of landslide management. Landslides pose significant threats to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment, necessitating effective management strategies. The study begins by introducing the topic of landslide management and its importance in mitigating landslide risks. It then delves into the scope of landslide management, including activities such as early warning systems, hazard mapping, and slope stabilization. The study highlights the various challenges faced in landslide management, such as limited resources, technical expertise, and data availability. Additionally, it discusses the limitations of current landslide management practices, emphasizing their inability to completely prevent landslides and the reliance on available technologies. Furthermore, the study presents case studies to provide real-world examples and insights into landslide management approaches. Future directions and opportunities in landslide management are explored, including the integration of advanced technologies, community-based approaches, and improved risk assessment techniques. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines scientific expertise, community engagement, and policy support to achieve effective landslide management and reduce the impacts of these natural hazards.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Varol, N., Cengiz, L. D. (2023). An Overview of Landslide Management: Scope, Difficulties, Limitations with Future Directions and Opportunities. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 609–621. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1298696

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. Dai, F. C., Lee, C. F., & Ngai, Y. Y. (2002). Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering geology, 64(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X
  2. Derin Cengiz, L. & Ercanoglu, M. (2022). A novel data-driven approach to pairwise comparisons in AHP using fuzzy relations and matrices for landslide susceptibility assessments. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(7), 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10312-0
  3. Fan, X., Xu, Q., Scaringi, G., Dai, L., Li, W., Dong, X.,. & Havenith, H. B. (2017). Failure mechanism and kinematics of the deadly June 24th 2017 Xinmo landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China. Landslides, 14, 2129-2146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0907-7
  4. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ. (2008). Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol. 102(3-4):85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022
  5. Glade, T. (2001). Landslide Hazard Assessment and Historical Landslide Data — An Inseparable Couple?. In: Glade, T., Albini, P., Francés, F. (eds) The Use of Historical Data in Natural Hazard Assessments. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3490-5_12
  6. Gökçeoğlu, C., & Ercanoğlu, M. (2001). Heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının hazırlanmasında kullanılan parametrelere ilişkin belirsizlikler. Yerbilimleri, 22(23), 189-206.
  7. Hu, K., Wu, C., Tang, J. et al. New understandings of the June 24th 2017 Xinmo Landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China. Landslides 15, 2465–2474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1073-2
  8. Ho, K., Leroi, E., & Roberds, B. (2000, November). Quantitative risk assessment: application, myths and future direction. In ISRM International Symposium. OnePetro.
  9. Kaya, Ç. M. (2022). Taşkın Duyarlılık Haritalarının Oluşturulmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler. Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 3(2), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1129606
  10. Musoke, R., Chimbaru, A., Jambai, A., Njuguna, C., Kayita, J., Bunn, J.,. & Fall, I. S. (2020). A Public health response to a mudslide in Freetown, Sierra Leone, 2017: Lessons Learnt. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 14(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.53
  11. Naiman, R. J., Decamps, H., & McClain, M. E. (2010). Riparia: ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. Elsevier.
  12. Sandholz, S., Lange, W., & Nehren, U. (2018). Governing green change: Ecosystem-based measures for reducing landslide risk in Rio de Janeiro. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 32, 75-86.
  13. Ulusay, R., Aydan, Ö., & Kılıc, R. (2007). Geotechnical assessment of the 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Turkey). Engineering geology, 89(1-2), 112-128.
  14. URL 1, https://www.who.int/health-topics/landslides#tab=tab_1 Accessed 26 March 2023
  15. URL 2, https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/07/22/oso-disaster-had-its-roots-in-earlier-landslides/ Accessed 26 March 2023
  16. URL 3, https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/five-years-later-oso-sr-530-landslide-washington Accessed 26 March 2023
  17. URL 4, https://www.environmentandsociety.org/arcadia/sidoarjo-mudflow-and-muddiness-environmental-disaster Accessed 26 March 2023
  18. URL 5, https://www.wired.com/2010/02/mudvolcano/ Accessed 26 March 2023
  19. URL 6, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-40390642 Accessed 26 March 2023
  20. URL 7, https://www.cepf.net/stories/sierra-leone-mudslide Accessed 26 March 2023
  21. URL 8, https://www.africanews.com/2022/08/30/sierra-leone-landslide-floods-kill-eight/ Accessed 26 March 2023
  22. URL 9, https://www.preventionweb.net/news/sierra-leone-climate-disaster-and-crisis-financing-shock-responsive-safety-nets Accessed 26 March 2023
  23. URL 10, https://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/18/africa/sierra-leone-mudslides/index.html Accessed 26 March 2023
  24. URL 11, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/video/koyulhisardaki-heyelan-felaketi-16-yildir-20-milyon-metrekup-topragin-altindalar-41764968 Accessed 26 March 2023
  25. URL 12, https://www.jatinverma.org/landslide-risk-reduction-and-resilience
  26. Varol, N., & Kaya, Ç. M. (2018). Afet Risk Yönetiminde Transdisipliner Yaklaşim. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.418307
  27. Vojteková, J., & Vojtek, M. (2020). Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233
  28. Wartman, J., Montgomery, D. R., Anderson, S. A., Keaton, J. R., Benoît, J., dela Chapelle, J., & Gilbert, R. (2016). The 22 March 2014 Oso landslide, Washington, USA. Geomorphology, 253, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.022
  29. Yilmaz, I., Ekemen, T., Yildirim, M., Keskin, İ., & Özdemir, G. (2006). Failure and flow development of a collapse induced complex landslide: the 2005 Kuzulu (Koyulhisar, Turkey) landslide hazard. Environmental geology, 49, 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0113-0
  30. Fan, X., Xu, Q., Scaringi, G., Dai, L., Li, W., Dong, X.,. & Havenith, H. B. (2017). Failure mechanism and kinematics of the deadly June 24th 2017 Xinmo landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China. Landslides, 14, 2129-2146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0907-7
  31. Musoke, R., Chimbaru, A., Jambai, A., Njuguna, C., Kayita, J., Bunn, J.,. & Fall, I. S. (2020). A Public health response to a mudslide in Freetown, Sierra Leone, 2017: Lessons Learnt. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 14(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.53