Dergiler / International Journal of Energy Studies / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

A systematic study on adsorptive removal of arsenic using low cost adsorbents with or without the presence of NOM

Sayfa
117–130
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results showed that the arsenic adsorption data were well fitted by modified Freundlich isotherm with R2 values between 0.87 and 0.90.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Arsenic is a toxic and bio-accumulating element in water bodies, especially in drinking water sources.One of the methods used to remove arsenic from drinking water is adsorption.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, batch adsorption experiments were carried out in synthetic and natural water using pumice, steel slag and red mud as low cost adsorbents.The highest arsenic removal efficiencies obtained with steel slag, pumice and red mud were 95, 95 and 50 %, respectively without the presence of NOM.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results showed that the arsenic adsorption data were well fitted by modified Freundlich isotherm with R2 values between 0.87 and 0.90.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pumice · Red mud · Steel slag

Abstract

Arsenic is a toxic and bio-accumulating element in water bodies, especially in drinking water sources.One of the methods used to remove arsenic from drinking water is adsorption. NOM (natural organic matter), which is ubiquitous in natural aquatic environments, can inhibit arsenic adsorption by competing with arsenic for adsorbent surface sites. The main objectives of this study were to investigate the competitive adsorption between NOM and arsenic using low-cost adsorbents. For this purpose, batch adsorption experiments were carried out in synthetic and natural water using pumice, steel slag and red mud as low cost adsorbents.The highest arsenic removal efficiencies obtained with steel slag, pumice and red mud were 95, 95 and 50 %, respectively without the presence of NOM. The results showed that the presence of NOM caused a significant reduction in arsenic adsorption for all tested adsorbents and 20-30% less arsenic removal efficiency was obtained in natural water compared to the removal efficiencies obtained in synthetic water. The maximum adsorption capacities obtained in synthetic water with all tested adsorbents vary between 1.6 -3.05 mgAs/g, while the maximum adsorption capacities obtained in natural water vary between 0.9-1.2 mgAs/g. All these findings indicate that NOM can hinder the uptake of arsenic by all tested adsorbents. Moreover, the arsenic adsorption in natural water were modelled by Langmuir, Freundlich and modified Freundlich. The results showed that the arsenic adsorption data were well fitted by modified Freundlich isotherm with R2 values between 0.87 and 0.90.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKGÜL, S. T., YILDIRAN, İ., ERDEM, T., ATEŞ, N., BEKAROĞLU, Ş. Ş. (2023). A systematic study on adsorptive removal of arsenic using low cost adsorbents with or without the presence of NOM. International Journal of Energy Studies, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 117–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/945075

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Hao L, Liu M, Wang N, Li G. A critical review on arsenic removal from water using iron-based adsorbents. RSC Advances 2018; 8: 39545–39560
  2. Elizalde-González M. P, Mattusch J, Einicke WD, Wennrich R. Sorption on natural solids for arsenic removal. Chemical Engineering Journal 2001; 81: 187-195
  3. World Health Organization (WHO) 1993. Guidelines for drinking water quality, vol 1, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva
  4. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2013. Arsenic in drinking water. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/index.cfm. Accessed 14 November 2022
  5. Turkish Ministry of Health, Regulation Concerning Water Intended for Human Consumption, Official News Paper, No. 25730, Ankara, Turkey, 2005
  6. Tözüm Akgül S, Kaplan Bekaroğlu ŞŞ. Removal of Arsenic from water with Low Cost and Environmentally- benign Adsorbents. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 2022; 12(3): 1395-1404
  7. Kumar R, Patel M, Singh P, Bundschuh J, Pittman CU, Trakal L, Mohan D. Emerging technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water in rural and peri-urban areas: Methods, experience from, and options for Latin America. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 694, 133427
  8. Mohan D, Pittman CU. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents-Ac critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007; 142, 1-53
  9. Bingül Z. The use of waste green tea leaves for crystal viyole adsorption: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 2021; 11(4): 2645-2659
  10. Foroutan R, Mohammadi R, Adeleye AS, Farjadfard S, Esvandi Z, Arfaeinia H, Sorial GA, Ramavandi B, Sahebi S. Efficient arsenic(V) removal from con-taminated water using natural clay and clay composite adsorbents. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019; 2: 29748–29762
  11. Kırkan B, Bekaroğlu M. 2019. Removal of Arsenate (V) by Adsorption Process from Aqueous Media Using Modified Pumice. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2019; 23(2): 356-366
  12. Balsamo M, Di Natale F, Erto A, Lancia A, Montagnaro F, Santoro L. Arsenate removal from synthetic wastewater by adsorption onto fly ash. Desalination 2010; 263: 58-63
  13. Genc-Fuhrman H, Bergnhoj H, McConchie D. Arsenate removal from water using sand-red mud columns. Water Research 2005; 39: 2944–2954
  14. Chiban M, Zerbet M, Carja G, Sinan F. Application of low-cost adsorbents for arsenic removal: A review. Journal of En