Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2018 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Elektrokoagülasyon Prosesi ile Patates Cipsi üretim atıksularından fosfor giderimi: Elektrot Materyali karşılaştırması

Removal of Phosphorus from Potato Chips Processing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Process: Comparison of Electrode Material

Sayfa
302–313
Yayın Tarihi
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorusremoval by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, removal of phosphorus from potato chips processing wastewater by electrocoagulation (EC)process was investigated by using Al and Fe electrodes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the EC modelreactor in which either Al or Fe electrodes were used, the optimum hydraulic retention time was found tobe 40 and 60 min, respectively, while the final pH was found to be 7.85 and 8.15, respectively, and thecurrent density was found to be 65 A/m2 for both electrode types.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorusremoval by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:aluminum electrode · iron electrode · electrocoagulation

Abstract

In this study, removal of phosphorus from potato chips processing wastewater by electrocoagulation (EC)process was investigated by using Al and Fe electrodes. Operating parameters affecting phosphorusremoval efficiency such as pH, current density and electrolysis time were optimized. In the EC modelreactor in which either Al or Fe electrodes were used, the optimum hydraulic retention time was found tobe 40 and 60 min, respectively, while the final pH was found to be 7.85 and 8.15, respectively, and thecurrent density was found to be 65 A/m2 for both electrode types. In case of using Al and Fe electrodesunder these experimental conditions, the initial total phosphorus concentration of 54.4 mg/L decreased to10.4 and 5.0 mg/L, respectively, and the initial orthophosphate concentration of 45.3 mg/L decreased to5.9 and 2.9 mg/L, respectively. Considering the final pH value, it can be pointed out that the resultanteffluent can be discharged without any pH adjustment.Considering the costs for electrodes, energy and chemical agents, operating costs for the continuous-flowEC model reactor were found out to be $1.14 and 0.76 per cubic meter wastewater for Al and Feelectrodes, respectively. It was determined that Fe electrodes are more effective than Al electrodes for theremoval of phosphates from potato chips processing wastewaters, and that the operating costs are lowerwhen Fe electrodes are used. It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorusremoval by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SOLAK, M., PAKDİL, N. B., KILIÇ, M., KOBYA, M. (2018). Elektrokoagülasyon Prosesi ile Patates Cipsi üretim atıksularından fosfor giderimi: Elektrot Materyali karşılaştırması. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 302–313. https://ajindex.com/articles/942220

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Referans1 M. Uğurlu, The Removal of Some Inorganic Compounds from Paper Mill Effluents by the Electrocoagulation Method. G.U. Journal of Science, 17(3), 85-99, 2004. Referans2 A. Günay, E. Debik, Evsel Atıksulardan Biyolojik Nütrient Giderimi. I. Atıksu Sempozyumu, 22-24
  2. Haziran, Kayseri, 57-63, 1998. Referans3 S.E. Manahan, Frontmatter, Fundamentals of Environmental Chemistry. Boca Raton, CRC Press LLC, 352p, 2001. Referans4 A. Samsunlu, 2006. Atıksuların Arıtılması. Birsen Yayınevi, 644s, İstanbul. Referans5 V.L. Snoeyink, D. Jenkins, Water Chemistry, John-Wiley and Sons, 451p, United States of America, 1980. Referans6 E. Oğuz, A. Gürses, N. Canplat, Removal of Phosphate from Wastewaters. Cement and Concrete Research, 33, 1109-1112, 2003. Referans7 B. Kıvanç, Adsorpsiyon ve İyon Değişimi Yöntemi ile Sulu Çözeltilerden Fosfat Gideriminin İncelenmesi. Osmangazi Üniversitesi,
  3. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 147s, Eskişehir, 2011. Referans8 D. Dolar, K. Kosutic, B. Vucic, RO/NF Treatment of Wastewater from Fertilizer Factory: Removal of Fluoride and Phosphate. Desalination, 265, 237-241. 2011. Referans9 T. Tunçal, Management of Phosphorus Removal in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. chenuz Eylül University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ph.d. Thesis, 242p, İzmir, 2008. Referans10 S. Tanada, M. Kabayama, N. Kawasaki, T. Sakiyama, T. Nakamura, M. Araki, T. Tamura, Removal of Phosphate by Aluminum Oxide Hydroxide. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 257,135-140, 2003. Referans11 Ş. İrdemez, N. Demircioğlu, Y.Ş. Yıldız, The Effects of pH on Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation with Iron Plate Electrodes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B137, 1231-1235, 2006. Referans12 Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, Third Edition,
  4. McGraw-Hill Inc., Civil Engineering Series, 1334p, New York, 1991. Referans13 M.F. Pouet, A. Grasmick, Urban Wastewater Treatment by Electrocoagulation and Flotation. Water Science Technology, 31, 275-283, 1995. Referans14 E.A. Vik, D.A. Carlson, A.S. Eikum, E.T. Gjessing, Electrocoagulation of Potable Water. Water Reserach, 18, 1355-1360, 1984. Referans15 J.S. Do, M.L. Chen, Decolourisations of Dye-Containing Solutions by Electrocoagulation, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 24, 785-790, 1994. Referans16 American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Waste and Wastewater (19th ed.), Washington, 2005. Referans17