Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Çok Kriterli Değerlendirme ile Ankara Güvenç Havzası’nda Erozyon Risk Tahminlenmesi

Sayfa
285–297
Yayın Tarihi
2017-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the obtained results, 45.9% of the basin area was identified as under high erosion risk.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine erosion risk classes and to generate their map in Ankara Güvenç Basin using geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing (RS) and statistical approaches with method of multi-criteria decision-making.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Basin covers about 17.3 km².
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the obtained results, 45.9% of the basin area was identified as under high erosion risk.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Analytical hierarchy process · Determining erosion risk · Linear combination technique

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine erosion risk classes and to generate their map in Ankara Güvenç Basin using geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing (RS) and statistical approaches with method of multi-criteria decision-making. Basin covers about 17.3 km². In order to determine erosion risk classes, seven criteria (texture, soil depth, precipitation, land use, elevation, slope and vegetation) that influence the occurrence of soil erosion, and sub-criteria of that seven criteria were taken into consideration. 1:25000 scale digital soil map and topographic map were used. In addition to that, Landsat 7 satellite images were used to generate the land use and vegetation cover map. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique was used to determine the priorities of the each criteria while, the Z-score statistical analysis technique was used to determine the priorities of the sub-criteria. Finally, linear combination technique was used to determine classes of erosion risk. According to the obtained results, 45.9% of the basin area was identified as under high erosion risk.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TURAN, İ. D., Dengiz, O. (2017). Çok Kriterli Değerlendirme ile Ankara Güvenç Havzası’nda Erozyon Risk Tahminlenmesi. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 285–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/933157

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Carver S J (1991). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(3): 321-339
  2. CORINE (1992). Commission of the European Communities. Soil Erosion Risk and Important Land Resources, Luxembourg Dengiz O & Başkan O (2005). Ankara Güvenç Havzası temel toprak özellikleri ve sınıflandırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 19(37): 27-36 Dengiz O & Akgül S (2005). Soil erosion risk assessment of the Gölbaşı Environmental Protection Area and its vicinity using CORINE Model. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 29(6): 439-448 Dengiz O & Sarıoğlu F E (2013). Parametric approach with linear combination technique in land evaluation studies. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 19(2): 101-112
  3. Dengiz O, Yakupoğlu T & Baskan O (2009). Soil erosion assessment using geographical information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) study from AnkaraGuvenc Basin, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 30(3): 339-344
  4. DSİ (1969). Türkiye Hidroloji Haritası. Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı DSİ. Yeraltı Suları Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara Flanagan D C & Nearing M A (1995). USDA-Water erosion prediction project: hillslope and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report No. 10.West Lafayette Ind. USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory ICONA (1997). Guidelines for Mapping and Measurement of Rainfall Induced Erosion Processes in the Mediterranean Coastal Areas. Priority Action Program Regional Activity Centre.Split, Croatia Kumar N V & Ganesh L S (1996). A simulation-based evaluation of the approximate and exact Eigenvector Methods employed in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95(3): 656-662
  5. Lal R (2001). Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degradation & Development 12: 519-539
  6. Malczewski J (1996). A GIS-based approach to multiple criteria group decision-making. Geographical Information Systems 10(8): 955-971
  7. Manrique L A (1988). LEAM: Land Erodibility Assessment Methodology. Edit. & Pub. Shop, Honolulu, HI MGM (2013). Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Ankara İstasyonu 1970-2013 Dönemi Ortalama ve Ekstremler Klimatoloji Bülten, Ankara Morgan R P C, Quinton J N & Rickson J R J (1992). Soil erosion prediction model for the Europian Community. GB-ISCO-WASWC MTA (1994).
  8. Maden Tetkik Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara Patrono A (1998). Multi-Criteria Analysis and Geographic Information Systems: Analysis of Natural Areas and Ecological D