Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

Comparison of Hens Reared in Free-Range and Deep-Litter Systems in Terms of Certain Production Characteristics

Sayfa
179–184
Yayın Tarihi
2018-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the study, it was concluded that hens in the deep-litter system gained more body weight compared to those in the free-range system but the other characteristics were not affected by the husbandry systems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study was carried out compare the hens reared in free range system and deep-litter system in terms of certain production characteristics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 300 Lohmann Brown hens, with 150 hens in each of the groups were used in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the study, it was concluded that hens in the deep-litter system gained more body weight compared to those in the free-range system but the other characteristics were not affected by the husbandry systems.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Free range system · Deep-litter system · Egg production age

Abstract

The study was carried out compare the hens reared in free range system and deep-litter system in terms of certain production characteristics. A total of 300 Lohmann Brown hens, with 150 hens in each of the groups were used in the study. In the free range system, 4 m2 grazing ground was allocated for each hen. The hens were taken into research henhouse at 16 weeks of age and production characteristics were determined up to 52 weeks of age. It was determined that out of the characteristics focused in the study, there is no significant difference between the groups in terms of viability, 50% production age, egg weight, hen-day egg production, feed efficiency, feed consumption and body weight at 18 week of age, whereas there is a significant difference in terms of final body weight. In the study, it was concluded that hens in the deep-litter system gained more body weight compared to those in the free-range system but the other characteristics were not affected by the husbandry systems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TÜRKER, İ., ALKAN, S. (2018). Comparison of Hens Reared in Free-Range and Deep-Litter Systems in Terms of Certain Production Characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 179–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/933137

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Anderson K E (2009). Overview of natural and organic production: Looking back to the future. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 348-354 Angelovičová M, Ševčíková V, Angelovič M & Bučko O (2014). Comparison of two different breeding systems of laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. Animal Science Biotechnology 47(2): 166-171
  2. Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A & Rossi M (2006). Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. 12th European Poultry Conference, 10-14
  3. September, Verona, Italy, pp. 277 Doley S, Barua N & Kalita N (2010). Effect of rearing systems on meat and egg qualities in indigenous fowls. Indian Veterinary Journal 87(2): 168-170 Hanusová E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A & Oravcová M (2015). Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica 18(1): 20-24
  4. Hill J A (1986). Egg production in alternative systems-a review of recent research in the UK. Research and Development in Agriculture 3(1): 13-18
  5. Leyendecker M, Hamann H, Hartung J, Kamphues J, Ring C, Glunder G, Ahlers C, Sander I, Neumann U & Distl O (2001). Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and hen housing systems for performance traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength 2nd communication: Egg quality traits. Züchtungskunde 73(4): 308-323 Malik S & Singh N P (2010). Performance of CARI Nirbheek in agroclimatic conditions of Tripura. Indian Journal of Animal Science 80(12): 1213-1216
  6. Nistor L I, Albu A & Usturoi M G (2014). Knowledge of chemical indicators of eggs from hens reared in conventional and free range system. Food Science & Technology 71(2): 119-124
  7. Nistor L I, Albu A, Nistor A C & Usturoi M G (2015). Aspects of eggs quality provided from free range and conventional systems. Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Science 5(2): 186-189
  8. Pavlovski Z, Mašic´ B, Josipovic´ S & Hopic´ S (1992). The effect of the system of housing on the laying performance of hens in small flocks. Biotechnologija u Stočarstvu 8(1-2): 57-63
  9. Pavlovski Z, S̆ krbic´ Z & Lukic´ M (2004). Influence of housing type on internal and external quality of eggs in small flocks of hens. Živinarstvo 39(6-7): 9-23
  10. Samiullah S, Roberts J R & Chousalkar K K (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23(1): 59-70
  11. Sekeroglu A, Sarı̇ca M, Demı̇r E, Ulutas Z, Tı̇lkı̇ M, Saatcı̇ M