Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2018 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Leadership Profiles of New Appointed Mexican School Leaders to Indigenous Schools Through the New System of Promotion

Sayfa
30–51
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the previous experiences new appointed school heads bring to the job, three different profiles were identified: An Extended classroom teacher profile, a managerial profile, and in few cases a leadership for learning profile.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this research was to explore the leadership identity development and preparedness for the role of new appointed school heads to Mexican primary schools that serve indigenous students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research was framed as a qualitative study and used semi-structured interviews as the method for data collection with twelve appointed school heads by the new system of promotion implemented in 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the previous experiences new appointed school heads bring to the job, three different profiles were identified: An Extended classroom teacher profile, a managerial profile, and in few cases a leadership for learning profile.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Leadership Identity · Leadership Preparation and Development · School Leaders

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to explore the leadership identity development and preparedness for the role of new appointed school heads to Mexican primary schools that serve indigenous students. The research was framed as a qualitative study and used semi-structured interviews as the method for data collection with twelve appointed school heads by the new system of promotion implemented in 2015. The study was carried out to the highest ethical standards in educational research with anonymity, confidentiality, consent, and respect for the participants observed at all times. This research found that new appointed Mexican school heads in primary schools are assigned to the post with different levels of leadership development. Based on the previous experiences new appointed school heads bring to the job, three different profiles were identified: An Extended classroom teacher profile, a managerial profile, and in few cases a leadership for learning profile.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DELGADO, M. L., LOYA, A. E. (2018). Leadership Profiles of New Appointed Mexican School Leaders to Indigenous Schools Through the New System of Promotion. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 30–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/932118

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bennis, W. (2009). On Becoming a Leader. New York: Basic Books. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
  2. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012)
  3. Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71).
  4. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2003). Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, puposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (4), 468-503.
  5. Bush, T. (2010). Leadership development. In T. Bush and D. Middlewood (Eds.), The Principles of Educational Management Leadership and Management (pp. 112-132).
  6. London, UK: Sage Publications. Crow, G., Day C., & Moller, J. (2016). Framing research on school principal’s identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265-277.
  7. Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  8. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (2009). Connecting Leadership and Learning: Principles for Practice. London: Routledge. DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow: A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35 (4), 627–47.
  9. Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10 (3), 374–93.
  10. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unity of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13 (4), 423 451. Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klinger, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34 (2), 3-13.
  11. Ibarra H., Snook, S., & Guillen Ramo, L. (2010). Identity-based leader development. In N. Nohria and R. Khuruma (Eds.), Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice (pp. 657-678).
  12. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  13. Jenkins, B. (2009). What it takes to be an instructional leader. Principal, 88 (3), 34-37.
  14. Kaplan, R. E., & Kai