Dergiler / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

A COMPARISON OF FENERBAHCE AND GALATASARAY FOOTBALL CLUB FANS: THE FACTORS OF AFFECTING STADIUM PARTICIPATIONS

Sayfa
40–48
Yayın Tarihi
2018-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Key Words: Fenerbahce and Galatasaray Football Club, Supporters and Stadium Attendance

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the factors affecting the stadium attendance of the supporters of Turkish professional football clubs that have stadiums fulfilling the UEFA criteria.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Method: The study population includes the supporters of Fenerbahçe and Galatasaray Football Club participating in Turkish Spor Toto Super League in 2013-2014 seasons and having stadiums that fulfill the UEFA criteria.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Key Words: Fenerbahce and Galatasaray Football Club, Supporters and Stadium Attendance
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Fenerbahce and Galatasaray Football Club · Supporters · Stadium Attendance

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the factors affecting the stadium attendance of the supporters of Turkish professional football clubs that have stadiums fulfilling the UEFA criteria. Material and Method: The study population includes the supporters of Fenerbahçe and Galatasaray Football Club participating in Turkish Spor Toto Super League in 2013-2014 seasons and having stadiums that fulfill the UEFA criteria. The sample consists of randomly selected (n=832) supporters. As well as demographic data of the supporters, reasons affecting the Stadium Attendance Scale developed by Soyguden, 2014 which consists of 30 questions were used to collect the data. Statistical analysis of the data was done using SPSS 16.0 packet program and and descriptive statistics, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA test were applied. Results: Among the variables affecting the participation of Galatasaray Football Club supporters participating in the stadium; "Recreation Activity Opportunity", "Stadium Atmosphere" and "Personal Relaxation Opportunity" variables were found high. Among the variables affecting the reasons for not participating in stadiums of Fenerbahçe Football Club fans; the levels of "Negative Ergonomic Environment" and "Unethical Situations" were found to be high. Conclusion: As a result, Galatasaray FK supporters' participation to the stadium most effective factor was found "Recreation Activity Opportunity" than the Fenerbahce FK supporters. In this case, it is recommended to increase the number and quality of recreational activities in the stadium. Our research showed that Fenerbahce FK supporter’s non participation to the stadium most effective factor was found "Negative Ergonomic Environment" than the Galatasaray FK supporters. With this result, it is proposed to improve the negative ergonomic environmental conditions in order to allow more fans to participate in the stadium. Key Words: Fenerbahce and Galatasaray Football Club, Supporters and Stadium Attendance

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SOYGÜDEN, A. (2018). A COMPARISON OF FENERBAHCE AND GALATASARAY FOOTBALL CLUB FANS: THE FACTORS OF AFFECTING STADIUM PARTICIPATIONS. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 40–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/931725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Cialdini, R.B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S. & Sloan, L. R. (1976), ‘Basking in Reflected Glory: Three Football Field Studies’, Journal of Social Psychology and Personality 34(2), 366-375 2. Darden WR, Babin BJ. (1994). Exploring the concept of affective quality: Expanding the concept of retail personality. Journal of Business Research. 1994
  2. 101–109. 3. DeSchriver TD, Rascher DA, Shapiro S. (2013). If we build it, will you come? Examining the effect of expansion teams and soccer-specific stadiums on Major League Soccer attendance. North American Society for Sport Management Conference. 2013. 4. DeSchriver, T.D. & Jensen, P.D. (2002), ‘Determinants of Spectator Attendance at NCAA Division II Football Contests’, Journal of Sport Management 16 (October), 311-330. 5. Funk DC, James J. (2001). ‘The Psychological Continuum Model: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding an Individual’s Psychological Connection to Sport’, Sport Management Review. 2001
  3. 4(2): 119-150. 6. Gençer RT, Aycan A. (2008). Seyircilerin Profesyonel Futbol Müsabakalarına Katılım Kararını Etkileyen Değişkenler Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ege Akademik Bakış. 2008
  4. 8(2): 771-783. 7. Gifford R. (1997). Environmental psychology. Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 1997
  5. Greenstein, T. N. & Marcum, J. P. (1981), ‘Factors affecting attendance of major league baseball: Team performance’, Review of Sport & Leisure 6(2), 21-34. 9. Grove, J.R., Hanrahan, S.J. and McInman, A. (1991), “Success/failure bias in attributions across involvement categories in sport”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, pp. 93‐7 10. Hirschman, E.C. & Holbrook, M.B. (1982) Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions, Journal of Marketing 46(3), 92-101. 11. Holahan CJ.(1986). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. 1986
  6. 381– 407. 12. Hunt Kenneth A., Bristol Terry, R. Bashaw Edward, (1999) "A conceptual approach to classifying sports fans", Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 13 Issue: 6, pp.439-452 13. Leeweun, L., Quick, S. and Daniel, K. 2002. The sport satisfaction model: A conceptual framework for understanding the satisfaction of spectators. Sport Management Review, 5(2): 99–128. 14. Mano, H. and Oliver, R.L. 1993. Assessing the dimensionality and structure of consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3): 451–466. 15. Morrow, S. (1999), Th