Dergiler / Journal of Economy Culture and Society / 2020 / Sayı: 61

Gender-based Economic Inequalities: A Review of Selected Concepts

Sayfa
371–382
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Future research could explore the empirical evidence on the dynamics of economic disparity while considering the theoretical concepts discussed in this article.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Economic inequality is a global phenomenon with all-encompassing implications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The final section demonstrates the implications of these paradoxical economic phenomena in the Turkish context.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Future research could explore the empirical evidence on the dynamics of economic disparity while considering the theoretical concepts discussed in this article.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Economic Sociology · Inequalities · Turkey

Abstract

Economic inequality is a global phenomenon with all-encompassing implications. While inequality affects both men and women, due to the socially ascribed gender roles and expectations women are more prone to experience disparities. Based on a narrative review, the aim of this article is to provide a primer on four selected theories related to genderbased economic inequalities. The first section provides a brief overview of a) sexual division of labor b) the nimble fingers theory c) glass wall and glass ceiling effects and d) female-headed households and the feminization of poverty. The final section demonstrates the implications of these paradoxical economic phenomena in the Turkish context. The article explains how women from diverse socio-economic backgrounds are prone to labor market inequalities because of the intricate nature of structural biases. A plethora of literature is available on the Turkish context, highlighting the nuances of economic participation. The present article complements the existing body of literature, however, it adds a new dimension by offering the theoretical underpinnings behind the economic inequalities endured by Turkish women. Future research could explore the empirical evidence on the dynamics of economic disparity while considering the theoretical concepts discussed in this article.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KHAN, M. (2020). Gender-based Economic Inequalities: A Review of Selected Concepts. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Sayı: 61, 371–382. https://ajindex.com/articles/92318

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., & Bryan, M. L. (2007). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. ILR Review, 60(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390706000201
  2. Atik, H., & Khan, M. (2016). Performance assessment of African countries in relation to women’s development. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (47), 1–11. Retrieved from http://dergipark. gov.tr/erciyesiibd/issue/28009/297418 Atkinson, A. B. (2014). After Piketty? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/14684446.12105
  3. Baker, J. D. (2016). The purpose, process, and methods of writing a literature review. AORN Journal, 103(3), 265– 269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016
  4. Bakirci, K. (2010). Gender equality in employment in Turkish legislation with comparisons to EU and international law. J. Workplace Rights, 15(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.15.1.b
  5. Barron, R. D., & Norris, G. M. (1991). Sexual divisions and the dual labour market. In Sexual Divisions Revisited (pp. 153–177). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21191-3_7 Benería, L. (1979). Reproduction, production and the sexual division of labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035421
  6. Bhatasara, S., & Chiweshe, M. K. (2017). Beyond gender: Interrogating women’s experiences in FTLRP in Zimbabwe. Africa Review, 9(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2017.1329808
  7. Cansiz, M., & Tekneci, P. D. (2018). Innovative and technology-based women entrepreneurs in Turkey: Capital and performance. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 57, 151–183. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS372449
  8. Chant, S. (2006). Re-thinking the “feminisation of poverty” in relation to aggregate gender indices. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768538
  9. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091
  10. Ecevit, Y. (2005). Shop floor control: The ideological construction of Turkish women factory workers. In M. T. S. Nanneke Redclift, M Thea Sinclair (Ed.), Working Women International Perspectives on Labour and Gender Ideology (pp. 65–88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975930-9
  11. Ecevit, Y. (2007). A critical approach to women’s entrepreneurship in Turkey. ILO. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/ publns Elson,