KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Trends in Business and Economics / 2013 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TURKISH AND KOREAN POLITICAL ECONOMY: ECONOMIC CRISIS PERSPECTIVE

-

Gökhan KARSAN
Erhan ATAY
Sayfa
272–302
Yayın Tarihi
2013-08-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Special focus will be given to causes and effects of economic crisis on national political economy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The right strategy for economic development and actors in industrialization are two important issues for developing countries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Whether state should invest in national industry as a sole actor or has a role of facilitator and controller is a significant issue discussed earlier by political economists.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Special focus will be given to causes and effects of economic crisis on national political economy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Politik Ekonomi · Türkiye · Kore

Abstract

The right strategy for economic development and actors in industrialization are two important issues for developing countries. The role of state and private sector in investments characterize the national economic system of a country. Whether state should invest in national industry as a sole actor or has a role of facilitator and controller is a significant issue discussed earlier by political economists. Turkey and Korea are good examples to show how the degree of government intervention can influence the formation entrepreneur class and establishment of private industries. This paper will try to compare and analyze main political economy of Turkey and Korea from earlier years of proclamation of republics to 1990s. Special focus will be given to causes and effects of economic crisis on national political economy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARSAN, G., ATAY, E. (2013). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TURKISH AND KOREAN POLITICAL ECONOMY: ECONOMIC CRISIS PERSPECTIVE. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 272–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/916535

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Aktan, C. C. (1991) “Turkey: from Inward-Oriented Etatism to OutwardLooking Liberal Strategy”, Turkish Public Administration Annual, (1719), pp. 55-85.
  2. Amsden, A. H. (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press,
  3. Oxford. Ashton, D., Green, F., James, D. and Sung, J. (1999) Education and Training for Development in East Asia: The Political Economy of Skill Formation in East Asian Newly Industrialised Economies, Routledge, London. Bakan, S. and Bırdışlı, F. (2010). “The Analysis of Nationalism, Statism, State Nationalism and State Economy in Turkey’s Modernisation Process: Comparing the Nation State of Europe to the State Nationalism in Turkey”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (1), pp. 357-376.
  4. Bayar, A. H. (1996) “The Developmental State and Economic Policy in Turkey”, Third World Quarterly, 17 (4), pp. 773-785.
  5. Boratav, K. (2008) Türkiye İktisat Tarihi 1908-2007,
  6. İmge Kitabevi,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Boratav, K. (1983) ‘Türkiye’de Devletçilik”, Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi’, v. 2, İletişim Yay., İstanbul.
  9. Burmeister, L. L. (1990) “State, Industrialization and Agricultural Policy in Korea’, Development and Change, 21, pp. 197–223.
  10. Campos, J. E., Root, L. and Hilton, L. (1996) The Key to Asian Miracle: Making Shared Growth Credible, Brookings Institution Press,
  11. Washington DC. Castells, M. (1992) “Four Asian Tigers With a Dragon Head: A Comparative Analysis of the State, Economy, and Society in the Asian Pacific Rim”, R. Appelbaum and J. Henderson (eds.), States and Development in the Asia Pacific Rim, Sage, London. Clifford, M. (1998) Troubled Tiger: Businessmen, Bureaucrats, and Generals in South Korea, M.E. Sharpe, New York. Cho, D. S., 1992. ‘From Subsidizer to Regulator - the Changing Role of Korean Government’, Long Range Planning, 25 (6): 48-55.
  12. Chung, K. H., Lee, H. C. and Jung, K. H. (1997) Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation, Walter de Gruyter, New York. Ener, M. and Demircan, E. S. (2007) “Müdahaleci Devlet Anlayışının Erozyonu: Maliye Politikalarında Değişim – Türkiye Örneği”, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve İktisat ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9 (13), pp. 205-234.
  13. Hiç, M. and Gencer, A. H. (2009) Turkish Economy and Politics: From 1923, the Foundation of the Republic until 2002,
  14. Beykent University Press,
  15. İstanbul.
  16. Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and The Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975, Stanford U