KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Trends in Business and Economics / 2013 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4

KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ

-

Tülay İLHAN NAS
Kader TAN ŞAHİN
Tarhan OKAN
Sayfa
210–228
Yayın Tarihi
2013-08-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Number of dependent directors also has a negative effect on the dependent variable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the preferences of the entry strategies of multinational companies from an emerging economy are demonstrated from the perspective of corporate governance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study focuses on the effect of the equity level and board composition on the entry strategies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Number of dependent directors also has a negative effect on the dependent variable.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kurumsal Yönetim · Yönetim Kurulları · Giriş Stratejileri

Abstract

In this study, the preferences of the entry strategies of multinational companies from an emerging economy are demonstrated from the perspective of corporate governance. The study focuses on the effect of the equity level and board composition on the entry strategies. The findings of the hierarchical regression analysis which were conducted on 700 observation belonging to 52 industrial production companies which are registered in Istanbul Stock Exchange illustrated that there are significant relationships between corporate governance and entry strategies. The findings also illustrated that equity levels of majority shareholder and third shareholder have positive efects on the entry strategies. On the other hand, board size has a positive effect on the entry strategies. Number of dependent directors also has a negative effect on the dependent variable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAS, T. İ., ŞAHİN, K. T., OKAN, T. (2013). KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 210–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/916529

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Agarwal, S., and Ramaswami, S.N. (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.23, No.1: 1-27.
  2. Aguilera, R.V. and Jackson G. (2003), “The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, No.3: 447-465.
  3. Aguilera, R.V. and Yip, G.S. (2004), “How National Corporate Governance Systems Affect Global Integration”, AIM Research Working Paper Series, 001-June 2004, ISSN:1744-0009.
  4. Aguilera, R.T. (2005), “Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: an Institutional Comparative Perspective”, British Journal of Management, Vol.16: 39-53.
  5. Alpay, G, Bodur, M., Ener H and Talug C. (2005), “Comparing Board Level Governance at MNEs and Local Firms Lessons from Turkey”, Journal of International Management, 11: 67-86.
  6. Barkema, H.G. and Vermeulen F. (1997), “What Differences in the Cultural Backgrounds of Partners are Detrimental for International Joint Ventures”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 845-864.
  7. Barney, J.B. and Hesterly, W. (1996), “Organizational Economics: Understanding the Relationship between Organizations and Economic Analysis”, Handbook of Organization Studies, (eds. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord), London: Sage: 115-147.
  8. Brouthers, K. D. and Hennart, J-F. (2007), “Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research”, Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425.
  9. Carpenter, M.A, Pollock T.G. and Leary, M.M. (2003), “Testing a Model of Reasoned Risk-Taking: Governance, the Experience of Principals and Agents, and Global strategy in Hıgh-Technology IPO Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 803-820.
  10. Chen H. and Hu M. Y. (2002), “An Analysis of Determinants of Entry Mode and its Impact on Performance”, International Business Review, 11: 193-2
  11. Conyon, M. J. and Peck S. I. (1998), “Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Countries”, The European Journal of Finance, 4: 291-304.
  12. Davis, P.S, Desai, A.B and Francis J.D. (2000), “Mode of International Entry: An Isomorphism Perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 2: 239-258.
  13. Dehaene, A., Vuyst, V. and Ooghe, H. (2001), “Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 34: 383-39
  14. Demirag, İ. and Serter M. (2003), “Ownership Patterns and Control in Turkish Listed Companies”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol.11,