Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of hemogram parameters in neonatal diarrhoeic calves with and without gastrointestinal protozoa infections

Sayfa
33–37
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: Evaluating hemogram parameters should be taken into account as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply analysis and offers important outputs in the control and follow-up of neonatal calf health especially in neonatal calf diarrhoea cases which is one of the common diseases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the hemogram analysis results of neonatal diarrheal calves with and without gastrointestinal protozoa infection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 21 neonatal calves with diarrhoea were examined within the scope of the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: Evaluating hemogram parameters should be taken into account as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply analysis and offers important outputs in the control and follow-up of neonatal calf health especially in neonatal calf diarrhoea cases which is one of the common diseases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:neonatal · calf · diarrhoea

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the hemogram analysis results of neonatal diarrheal calves with and without gastrointestinal protozoa infection. Materials and Methods: A total of 21 neonatal calves with diarrhoea were examined within the scope of the study. A total of 21 neonatal calves with diarrhoea were examined within the scope of the study. Eleven of the cases were calves with gastrointestinal protozoa infection and 10 were calves without gastrointestinal protozoa infection. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of calves were evaluated. Results: When demographic data and vital signs were evaluated between the two groups, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). However, when the hemogram values between the two groups were compared, it was determined that there was a significant difference in white blood cell (p=0.003) and neutrophil (p=0.01) numbers. Conclusions: Evaluating hemogram parameters should be taken into account as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply analysis and offers important outputs in the control and follow-up of neonatal calf health especially in neonatal calf diarrhoea cases which is one of the common diseases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, N. K. (2023). Evaluation of hemogram parameters in neonatal diarrhoeic calves with and without gastrointestinal protozoa infections. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 33–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/913835

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Abuelo A. Investigation of an outbreak of neonatal calf diarrhoea in a dairy herd. Vet Rec. 2017; 4(2):e000372. Altug N, Yuksek N, Ozkan C, et al. Neonatal buzağı ishallerinin immunokromotografik test kitleri ile hızlı etiyolojik teşhisi. YYU Vet Fak Derg., 2013; 24(3):123-128.
  2. Atcali T, Yıldız R. Neonatal buzaği ishallerinde farkli etiyolojik faktörlerin hemogram parametreleri üzerine etkisi. MAKÜ Sag Bil Enst Derg. 2020; 8(3):119-27.
  3. Berber E, Çanakoğlu N, Sözdutmaz İ, et al. Seasonal and age-associated pathogen distribution in newborn calves with diarrhea admitted to ICU. Vet Sci. 20219; 8(7):128. Brenner J, Elad E, Markovics A, Grinberg A, Trainin Z. Epidemiological study of neonatal calf diarrhoea in Israel-A one-year survey of faecal samples. Isr J Vet Med. 1993; 48:113. Chao DL, Roose A, Roh M, Kotloff KL, Proctor JL. The seasonality of diarrheal pathogens: A retrospective study of seven sites over three years. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(8):e0007211. Cho YI, Yoon KJ. An overview of calf diarrhea-infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. J Vet Sci. 2014; 15(1):1-7.
  4. Çitil M, Arslan MÖ, Güneş V, Erdoğan HM. Neonatal buzağı ishallerinde Cryptosporidium ve Eimeria enfeksiyonlarının rolü. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2004; 10(1):59-64. Elitok B. Epidemiology of coccidiosis and effects of the infection on some clinical and hematological examination findings in calves. JIVS. 2020; 4(1):21-25.
  5. Elitok ÖM, Elitok B. Parenteral applications of colostrum serums in treatment and prevention of neonatal calf diarrhea. Kocatepe Vet J. 2016; 9(3):211-214.
  6. Glombowsky P, Da Silva AS, Volpato A, et al. Relation between diarrhea and infection by protozoans in dairy calves. Comp Clin Path. 2017; 26:929-33.
  7. Jorgensen MW, Adams-Progar A, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Salfer JA, Endres MI. Mortality and health treatment rates of dairy calves in automated milk feeding systems in the Upper Midwest of the United States. Journal of dairy science. 2017; 100(11):9186-9193.
  8. Lanz Uhde F, Kaufmann T, Sager H, et al. Prevalence of four enteropathogens in the faeces of young diarrhoeic dairy calves in Switzerland. Vet Rec. 2008; 163(12):362-366.
  9. Meyer CL, Berger PJ, Koehler KJ, Thompson JR, Sattler CG. Phenotypic trends in incidence of stillbirth for Holsteins in the United States. JDS. 2001; 84(2):515-523. Mõtus K, Reimus K, Orro T, Viltrop A, Emanuelson U. On-farm mortality, causes and risk factors in Estonian beef cow-calf herds. Prev Vet Med. 2017; 139:10-19. Naylor JM. Neonatal