KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 36

ÖĞRETMEN KONUŞMASI ANALİZİ İLE YANSITICILIK: HİZMET ÖNCESİ İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DURUMU

REFLECTIVITY THROUGH THE ANALYSIS OF TEACHER TALK: THE CASE OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS

S. İpek KURU GÖNEN
Asuman AŞIK
Sayfa
1–1
Yayın Tarihi
2016-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Reflective practices are considered significant in terms of increasing the level of reflective and critical thinking of language teachers by promoting self-evaluation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, a total of 44 pre-service teachers in the English Language Teaching programmes of two universities in Turkey participated in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Reflection · Pre-service Teacher Education · Teacher Talk

Özet

Reflective practices are considered significant in terms of increasing the level of reflective and critical thinking of language teachers by promoting self-evaluation. Analysis of classroom interaction can be regarded as one of the ways to improve teacher reflection. This study aims at investigating reflectivity of pre-service English teachers by engaging them in the analysis of their language use through a framework that enabled them focus on self-evaluation of teacher talk and various aspects of classroom interaction. For this purpose, a total of 44 pre-service teachers in the English Language Teaching programmes of two universities in Turkey participated in the study. The participants consisted of a control group and a study group. The study group received training on the analysis of their own talk by using the self-evaluation of teacher talk framework. The study was conducted through mixed methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire while qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries. The results indicated that although both groups improved their reflectivity, pre-service English teachersin the study group were able move upwards in reflectivity levels compared to the control group through the use of a specific framework. The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.

Abstract

Reflective practices are considered significant in terms of increasing the level of reflective and critical thinking of language teachers by promoting self-evaluation. Analysis of classroom interaction can be regarded as one of the ways to improve teacher reflection. This study aims at investigating reflectivity of pre-service English teachers by engaging them in the analysis of their language use through a framework that enabled them focus on self-evaluation of teacher talk and various aspects of classroom interaction. For this purpose, a total of 44 pre-service teachers in the English Language Teaching programmes of two universities in Turkey participated in the study. The participants consisted of a control group and a study group. The study group received training on the analysis of their own talk by using the self-evaluation of teacher talk framework. The study was conducted through mixed methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire while qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries. The results indicated that although both groups improved their reflectivity, pre-service English teachersin the study group were able move upwards in reflectivity levels compared to the control group through the use of a specific framework. The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖNEN, S. İ. K., AŞIK, A. (2016). ÖĞRETMEN KONUŞMASI ANALİZİ İLE YANSITICILIK: HİZMET ÖNCESİ İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DURUMU. Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 36, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/910748

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Al-Hassan, O., Al-Barakat, A., & Al-Hassan, Y. (2012). Pre-service teachers' reflections during field experience. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(4), 419-434.
  2. Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A. & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97-117.
  3. Arrastia, M. C., Rawls, E. S., Brinkerhoff, E. H., & Roehrig, A. D. (2014). The nature of elementary preservice teachers’ reflection during an early field experience. Reflective Practice, 15(4), 427-444.
  4. Aşık, A. & Kuru Gönen, S. İpek. (2016) Pre-service EFL teachers’ reported perceptions of their development through SETT experience. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 164-183.
  5. Chen, D., Lumpe, A. & Bishop, D. (2013). Assessment of teacher candidate reflection in e-portfolios. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013 (pp. 1872-1881). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/112224. (Access Date: 10. 03.2016)
  6. Cohen-Sayag, E. & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing in pre-service teachers' teaching: what does it promote?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 37(10), 20-36.
  7. Cunningham-Florez, M. A. (2001). Reflective teaching practice in adult ESL settings. ERIC Digest.http://www.cal.org/ncle/digest/reflect.htm. 1-7. (Access Date: 11.05.2009)
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
  9. Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 260-275.
  10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Heath. Downey. J. (2008). ‘It’s not as easy as it looks’: Preservice teachers’ insights about teaching emerging from an innovative assignment in educational psychology. Teaching Educational Psychology, 3(1), 1-11.
  11. Erginel, S. Ş. (2006). Developing reflective teachers: A study on perception and improvement of reflection in preservice teacher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University. Lyngsnes, K.